Evaluation of peroxide release during nonvital bleaching using three different coronal barriers: An
Biodentine
ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate
bleaching agents
nonvital bleaching
tricalcium silicate
Journal
Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics
ISSN: 2950-4708
Titre abrégé: J Conserv Dent Endod
Pays: India
ID NLM: 9918697474706676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2024
Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
20
06
2024
revised:
03
07
2024
accepted:
16
07
2024
medline:
25
10
2024
pubmed:
25
10
2024
entrez:
25
10
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Peroxide from bleaching agents can cause external cervical resorption. An intracoronal barrier is used to prevent leakage of bleaching agents into the periradicular space. This study aims to determine and compare the amount of peroxide released, during non vital bleaching at the end of 1 Forty-five single-rooted teeth were selected for the study and root canal therapy was performed. Three millimeters of the coronal gutta-percha were removed and according to the coronal barrier placed, samples were divided into Group A: GIC, Group B: ProRoot MTA, and Group C: Biodentine. Nonvital bleaching was done using sodium perborate and 30% H This was done using the Wilcoxon matched pair test and the Kruskal-Wallis test. No significant difference in intergroup comparison at the end of 1 All the three tested materials (GIC, MTA, and Biodentine) may be preferred as intracoronal barrier for nonvital bleaching.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Peroxide from bleaching agents can cause external cervical resorption. An intracoronal barrier is used to prevent leakage of bleaching agents into the periradicular space.
Aim
UNASSIGNED
This study aims to determine and compare the amount of peroxide released, during non vital bleaching at the end of 1
Materials and Methods
UNASSIGNED
Forty-five single-rooted teeth were selected for the study and root canal therapy was performed. Three millimeters of the coronal gutta-percha were removed and according to the coronal barrier placed, samples were divided into Group A: GIC, Group B: ProRoot MTA, and Group C: Biodentine. Nonvital bleaching was done using sodium perborate and 30% H
Statistical Analysis
UNASSIGNED
This was done using the Wilcoxon matched pair test and the Kruskal-Wallis test.
Results
UNASSIGNED
No significant difference in intergroup comparison at the end of 1
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
All the three tested materials (GIC, MTA, and Biodentine) may be preferred as intracoronal barrier for nonvital bleaching.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39450351
doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_387_24
pii: JCDE-27-920
pmc: PMC11498232
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
920-924Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2024 Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
There are no conflicts of interest.