Compliance With Accreditation Standards on Diversity: Is Institutional Support the Missing Link?
Journal
The journal of physician assistant education : the official journal of the Physician Assistant Education Association
ISSN: 1941-9449
Titre abrégé: J Physician Assist Educ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101298201
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Oct 2024
16 Oct 2024
Historique:
medline:
25
10
2024
pubmed:
25
10
2024
entrez:
25
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The role of accreditation standards in fostering diversity and inclusion in academic programs remains poorly understood. Accreditation is one approach to increasing diversity through Standard A1.11. This study investigates the impact of the Accreditation Review Commission-Physician Assistant (ARC-PA) standards on diversity and inclusion in physician assistant (PA) programs and explores challenges faced by programs in achieving compliance. This qualitative exploratory study first reviewed diversity standards in accreditation documents among selected health professions; second, data on the frequency of citations from ARC-PA related to diversity were gathered and analyzed; finally, opinions from 23 PA faculty and leaders were solicited through semistructured interviews. Two research team members analyzed the data to identify themes. Most institutions sponsoring PA programs had preexisting diversity policies before the inception of standard A1.11 of the ARC-PA. Between June 2020 and March 2023, seven programs received 16 citations related to Standard A1.11. Interviews with faculty revealed 4 major themes: (1) the importance of institutional support, (2) early pipeline development of applicants, (3) prioritizing faculty and/or student diversity as key program goals, and (4) local context, with institutional support and pipeline development being most prominent. The inclusion of Standard A1.11 in the ARC-PA Standards signifies the growing recognition of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in PA education. Institutions can advance DEI in the PA profession by leveraging accreditation-related activities through leadership, partnerships, and accountability measures consistent with the institution's mission and applicable laws. Institutional support emerged as an important factor in compliance with diversity-related accreditation standards.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39451009
doi: 10.1097/JPA.0000000000000618
pii: 01367895-990000000-00184
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 PA Education Association.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Wilbur K, Snyder C, Essary AC, Reddy S, Will KK, Saxon M. Developing workforce diversity in the health professions: a social justice perspective. Health Professions Educ. 2022;6(2):222-229.
Bradley-Guidry C, Burwell N, Dorough R, Bester V, Kayingo G, Suzuki S. An assessment of physician assistant student diversity in the United States: a snapshot for the healthcare workforce. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):1-12.
Kayingo G, Bradley-Guidry C, Burwell N, Suzuki S, Dorough R, Bester V. Assessing and benchmarking equity, diversity, and inclusion in healthcare professions. JAAPA. 2022;35(11):51-54.
Young PA, Griffith CF, Ticknor IL, et al. Diversity of PA cohorts during the evolution to an entry-level master's degree. JAAPA. 2024;37(2):1-6.
Salsberg E, Richwine C, Westergaard S, et al. Estimation and comparison of current and future racial/ethnic representation in the US health care workforce. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(3):e213789.
Laurencin CT, Murray M. An American crisis: the lack of Black men in medicine. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2017;4(3):317-321.
National Commission on Certification of Physician Assistants. Statistical Profile of Board Certified Physician Assistants. Johns Creek, GA: NCCPA; 2023.
Kozikowski A, Bruza-Augatis M, Morton-Rias D, et al. The importance of diversity in the physician assistant/associate workforce: examining the profession's growth and trends in demographic composition. J Med Regul. 2024;110(1):7-19.
Pittman P, Chen C, Erikson C, et al. Health workforce for health equity. Med Care. 2021;59(suppl 5):S405-S408.
Kelderman E. The new accountability: how accreditors are measuring colleges' diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts. The Chronicle of Higher Education. 2023;69(16). https://www.chronicle.com/article/the-new-accountability. Accessed July 15, 2023.
Liaison Committee of Medical Education. Functions and Structure of a medical School. 2024. https://lcme.org/publications/. Accessed September 16, 2024.
Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE). Procedures for accreditation of baccalaureate and graduate nursing programs amended: June 7, 2023. https://www.aacnnursing.org/portals/0/PDFs/CCNE/Procedures.pdf. Accessed September 16, 2024.
Accreditation Review Commission-Physician Assistant. Accreditation Standards for Physician Assistant Education. 5th ed. Suwanee, GA: ARC-PA; 2019.
Nora LM. Using accreditation to transform diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts into diversity, equity, and inclusion systems. Acad Med. 2022;97(1):25-29.
Barzansky B, Hash RB, Catanese V, Waechter D. What is the role of accreditation in achieving medical school diversity? AMA J Ethics. 2021;23(12):946-952.
Ko M, Henderson MC, Fancher TL, London MR, Simon M, Hardeman RR. US medical school admissions leaders' experiences with barriers to and advancements in diversity, equity, and inclusion. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(2):E2254928.
Accreditation Review Commission-Physician Assistant. Newsletter. 2023. https://mailchi.mp/arc-pa/newsletterspring2023. Accessed July 15, 2023.
Snyder J, Hills K, Alexander L, et al. Meeting the accreditation standard for diversity. J Physician Assist Educ. 2023;34(1):46-53.
Gonzaga AMR, Appiah-Pippim J, Onumah CM, Yialamas MA. A framework for inclusive graduate medical education recruitment strategies: meeting the ACGME standard for a diverse and inclusive workforce. Acad Med. 2020;95(5):710-716.
Dewey J. Experience and Education. New York, NY: Macmillan; 1938.
Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2018.
Saldaña J. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2021.
National Academy of Science, Institute of Medicine. In the Nation's Compelling Interest: Ensuring Diversity in the Health Care Workforce. Washinton, DC: National Academy Press; 2004.
McNair T, Bensimon E, Malcolm-Piqueux L, Pasquerella L. From Equity Talk to Equity Walk: Expanding Practitioner Knowledge for Racial Justice in Higher Education. Washington, DC: Jossey-Bass; 2020.