Comparative Molecular Docking of Apigenin and Luteolin versus Conventional Ligands for TP-53, pRb, APOBEC3H, and HPV-16 E6: Potential Clinical Applications in Preventing Gynecological Malignancies.
APOBEC
HPV-16
TP-53
apigenin
high-performance computing (HPC)
luteolin
molecular docking
oncoprotein E6
pRb
protein–protein interaction
Journal
Current issues in molecular biology
ISSN: 1467-3045
Titre abrégé: Curr Issues Mol Biol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 100931761
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Oct 2024
03 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
14
08
2024
revised:
25
09
2024
accepted:
29
09
2024
medline:
25
10
2024
pubmed:
25
10
2024
entrez:
25
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study presents a comparative analysis of molecular docking data, focusing on the binding interactions of the natural compounds apigenin and luteolin with the proteins TP-53, pRb, and APOBEC, in comparison to conventional pharmacological ligands. Advanced bioinformatics techniques were employed to evaluate and contrast binding energies, showing that apigenin and luteolin demonstrate significantly higher affinities for TP-53, pRb, and APOBEC, with binding energies of -6.9 kcal/mol and -6.6 kcal/mol, respectively. These values suggest strong potential for therapeutic intervention against HPV-16. Conventional ligands, by comparison, exhibited lower affinities, with energies ranging from -4.5 to -5.5 kcal/mol. Additionally, protein-protein docking simulations were performed to assess the interaction between HPV-16 E6 oncoprotein and tumor suppressors TP-53 and pRb, which revealed high binding energies around -976.7 kcal/mol, indicative of their complex interaction. A conversion formula was applied to translate these protein-protein interaction energies to a comparable scale for non-protein interactions, further underscoring the superior binding potential of apigenin and luteolin. These findings highlight the therapeutic promise of these natural compounds in preventing HPV-16-induced oncogenesis, warranting further experimental validation for clinical applications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39451541
pii: cimb46100661
doi: 10.3390/cimb46100661
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng