Comparative Molecular Docking of Apigenin and Luteolin versus Conventional Ligands for TP-53, pRb, APOBEC3H, and HPV-16 E6: Potential Clinical Applications in Preventing Gynecological Malignancies.

APOBEC HPV-16 TP-53 apigenin high-performance computing (HPC) luteolin molecular docking oncoprotein E6 pRb protein–protein interaction

Journal

Current issues in molecular biology
ISSN: 1467-3045
Titre abrégé: Curr Issues Mol Biol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 100931761

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 14 08 2024
revised: 25 09 2024
accepted: 29 09 2024
medline: 25 10 2024
pubmed: 25 10 2024
entrez: 25 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study presents a comparative analysis of molecular docking data, focusing on the binding interactions of the natural compounds apigenin and luteolin with the proteins TP-53, pRb, and APOBEC, in comparison to conventional pharmacological ligands. Advanced bioinformatics techniques were employed to evaluate and contrast binding energies, showing that apigenin and luteolin demonstrate significantly higher affinities for TP-53, pRb, and APOBEC, with binding energies of -6.9 kcal/mol and -6.6 kcal/mol, respectively. These values suggest strong potential for therapeutic intervention against HPV-16. Conventional ligands, by comparison, exhibited lower affinities, with energies ranging from -4.5 to -5.5 kcal/mol. Additionally, protein-protein docking simulations were performed to assess the interaction between HPV-16 E6 oncoprotein and tumor suppressors TP-53 and pRb, which revealed high binding energies around -976.7 kcal/mol, indicative of their complex interaction. A conversion formula was applied to translate these protein-protein interaction energies to a comparable scale for non-protein interactions, further underscoring the superior binding potential of apigenin and luteolin. These findings highlight the therapeutic promise of these natural compounds in preventing HPV-16-induced oncogenesis, warranting further experimental validation for clinical applications.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39451541
pii: cimb46100661
doi: 10.3390/cimb46100661
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

11136-11155

Auteurs

Momir Dunjic (M)

School of Medicine, University of Pristina, BB Anri Dinana, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia.
Faculty of Pharmacy, Heroja Pinkija 4, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.
Alma Mater Europaea (AMEU-ECM), Slovenska Ulica/Street 17, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
BDORT Center for Functional Supplementation and Integrative Medicine, Bulevar Oslobodjenja 2, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

Stefano Turini (S)

Alma Mater Europaea (AMEU-ECM), Slovenska Ulica/Street 17, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
BDORT Center for Functional Supplementation and Integrative Medicine, Bulevar Oslobodjenja 2, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Guard Plus Doo, Nemanjina 40, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Worldwide Consultancy and Services, Division of Advanced Research and Development, Via Andrea Ferrara 45, 00165 Rome, Italy.
Capri Campus Forensic and Security, Division of Environmental Medicine and Security, Via G. Orlandi 91 Anacapri, Capri Island, 80071 Naples, Italy.

Lazar Nejkovic (L)

Belgrade University, School of Medicine, dr Subotića Starijeg 8, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Clinic for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kraljice Natalije 62, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

Nenad Sulovic (N)

School of Medicine, University of Pristina, BB Anri Dinana, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia.

Sasa Cvetkovic (S)

School of Medicine, University of Pristina, BB Anri Dinana, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia.

Marija Dunjic (M)

Worldwide Consultancy and Services, Division of Advanced Research and Development, Via Andrea Ferrara 45, 00165 Rome, Italy.

Katarina Dunjic (K)

BDORT Center for Functional Supplementation and Integrative Medicine, Bulevar Oslobodjenja 2, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

Dina Dolovac (D)

General Hospital, UI. Generala Zivkovica 1, 36300 Novi Pazar, Serbia.

Classifications MeSH