Sharing Mono-Institutional Experience of Treating Pancreatic Cancer with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT).


Journal

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)
ISSN: 1718-7729
Titre abrégé: Curr Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9502503

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 16 07 2024
revised: 14 09 2024
accepted: 16 09 2024
medline: 25 10 2024
pubmed: 25 10 2024
entrez: 25 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an evolving treatment for the local management of pancreatic cancer (PC). The main purpose of this study is to report our initial experience in terms of local control (LC) and toxicity for PC patients treated with SBRT. We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated with SBRT using abdominal compression (AC) or an end-expiratory breath-holding (EEBH) technique. The median prescribed dose was 35 Gy, delivered in five fractions. Toxicities were recorded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0, and survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. From 2017 to 2023, 17 PC patients were offered SBRT. Their median age was 69 years. The median follow-up from the date of diagnosis was 22.37 months. The overall survival (OS) was 94% at 1 year and 60.9% at 2 years. The progression-free survival (PFS) was 63.1% at 6 months and 56.1% at 9 months. The median OS was 26.3 months, and the median PFS was 20.6 months. The 6-month and 1-year LC rates were 71% and 50.8%, respectively. We are successful in implementing the SBRT program at our centre. SBRT appears to be a promising treatment option for achieving LC with limited acute toxicities.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an evolving treatment for the local management of pancreatic cancer (PC). The main purpose of this study is to report our initial experience in terms of local control (LC) and toxicity for PC patients treated with SBRT.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated with SBRT using abdominal compression (AC) or an end-expiratory breath-holding (EEBH) technique. The median prescribed dose was 35 Gy, delivered in five fractions. Toxicities were recorded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0, and survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS RESULTS
From 2017 to 2023, 17 PC patients were offered SBRT. Their median age was 69 years. The median follow-up from the date of diagnosis was 22.37 months. The overall survival (OS) was 94% at 1 year and 60.9% at 2 years. The progression-free survival (PFS) was 63.1% at 6 months and 56.1% at 9 months. The median OS was 26.3 months, and the median PFS was 20.6 months. The 6-month and 1-year LC rates were 71% and 50.8%, respectively.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
We are successful in implementing the SBRT program at our centre. SBRT appears to be a promising treatment option for achieving LC with limited acute toxicities.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39451750
pii: curroncol31100446
doi: 10.3390/curroncol31100446
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

5974-5986

Subventions

Organisme : Alberta Cancer Foundation

Auteurs

Asmara Waheed (A)

Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada.

Shannah Murland (S)

Department of Radiation Therapy, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada.

Eugene Yip (E)

Division of Medical Physics, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada.

Amr Heikal (A)

Division of Medical Physics, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada.

Sunita Ghosh (S)

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada.

Aswin Abraham (A)

Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada.

Kim Paulson (K)

Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada.

Keith Tankel (K)

Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada.

Nawaid Usmani (N)

Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada.

Diane Severin (D)

Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada.

Clarence Wong (C)

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada.

Kurian Joseph (K)

Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta & Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH