Cost-Effectiveness of GaitSmart and an Artificial Intelligence Solution for Rehabilitation of Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) and Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) in Older Population in the United Kingdom.
GaitSmart
cost-effectiveness analysis
rehabilitation
total hip arthroplasty
total knee arthroplasty
Journal
Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2308-3417
Titre abrégé: Geriatrics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101704019
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Oct 2024
05 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
18
05
2024
revised:
05
08
2024
accepted:
18
09
2024
medline:
25
10
2024
pubmed:
25
10
2024
entrez:
25
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
GaitSmart (GS) is a sensor-based digital medical device that can be used with the integrated app vGym to provide a personalised rehabilitation programme for older people undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to determine whether the GS intervention used in the rehabilitation of older people undergoing THA or TKA is potentially cost-effective compared to the current standard of care (SoC). Decision-analytic modelling was conducted to estimate the cost-effectiveness over a seventeen-week time horizon from an NHS perspective. UK clinical and cost data from the GaitSmart randomised clinical trial was used to obtain the input parameters, and a sensitivity analysis was performed to address uncertainties. Over a seventeen-week time horizon, GS incurred cost savings of GBP 450.56 and a 0.02 gain in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared to the SoC. These results indicate that GS is the dominant intervention because the device demonstrated greater effectiveness and lower costs. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirm the robustness of our results. GS appears to offer short-term efficiency benefits and demonstrates cost-effectiveness for the improvement in gait in people undergoing THA or TKA, compared to the SoC.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
GaitSmart (GS) is a sensor-based digital medical device that can be used with the integrated app vGym to provide a personalised rehabilitation programme for older people undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to determine whether the GS intervention used in the rehabilitation of older people undergoing THA or TKA is potentially cost-effective compared to the current standard of care (SoC).
METHODS
METHODS
Decision-analytic modelling was conducted to estimate the cost-effectiveness over a seventeen-week time horizon from an NHS perspective. UK clinical and cost data from the GaitSmart randomised clinical trial was used to obtain the input parameters, and a sensitivity analysis was performed to address uncertainties.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Over a seventeen-week time horizon, GS incurred cost savings of GBP 450.56 and a 0.02 gain in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared to the SoC. These results indicate that GS is the dominant intervention because the device demonstrated greater effectiveness and lower costs. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirm the robustness of our results.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
GS appears to offer short-term efficiency benefits and demonstrates cost-effectiveness for the improvement in gait in people undergoing THA or TKA, compared to the SoC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39451861
pii: geriatrics9050129
doi: 10.3390/geriatrics9050129
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Innovate UK
ID : Digital Health Grant (2020)