Cost-Effectiveness of GaitSmart and an Artificial Intelligence Solution for Rehabilitation of Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) and Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) in Older Population in the United Kingdom.

GaitSmart cost-effectiveness analysis rehabilitation total hip arthroplasty total knee arthroplasty

Journal

Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2308-3417
Titre abrégé: Geriatrics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101704019

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 18 05 2024
revised: 05 08 2024
accepted: 18 09 2024
medline: 25 10 2024
pubmed: 25 10 2024
entrez: 25 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

GaitSmart (GS) is a sensor-based digital medical device that can be used with the integrated app vGym to provide a personalised rehabilitation programme for older people undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to determine whether the GS intervention used in the rehabilitation of older people undergoing THA or TKA is potentially cost-effective compared to the current standard of care (SoC). Decision-analytic modelling was conducted to estimate the cost-effectiveness over a seventeen-week time horizon from an NHS perspective. UK clinical and cost data from the GaitSmart randomised clinical trial was used to obtain the input parameters, and a sensitivity analysis was performed to address uncertainties. Over a seventeen-week time horizon, GS incurred cost savings of GBP 450.56 and a 0.02 gain in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared to the SoC. These results indicate that GS is the dominant intervention because the device demonstrated greater effectiveness and lower costs. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirm the robustness of our results. GS appears to offer short-term efficiency benefits and demonstrates cost-effectiveness for the improvement in gait in people undergoing THA or TKA, compared to the SoC.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
GaitSmart (GS) is a sensor-based digital medical device that can be used with the integrated app vGym to provide a personalised rehabilitation programme for older people undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to determine whether the GS intervention used in the rehabilitation of older people undergoing THA or TKA is potentially cost-effective compared to the current standard of care (SoC).
METHODS METHODS
Decision-analytic modelling was conducted to estimate the cost-effectiveness over a seventeen-week time horizon from an NHS perspective. UK clinical and cost data from the GaitSmart randomised clinical trial was used to obtain the input parameters, and a sensitivity analysis was performed to address uncertainties.
RESULTS RESULTS
Over a seventeen-week time horizon, GS incurred cost savings of GBP 450.56 and a 0.02 gain in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared to the SoC. These results indicate that GS is the dominant intervention because the device demonstrated greater effectiveness and lower costs. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirm the robustness of our results.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
GS appears to offer short-term efficiency benefits and demonstrates cost-effectiveness for the improvement in gait in people undergoing THA or TKA, compared to the SoC.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39451861
pii: geriatrics9050129
doi: 10.3390/geriatrics9050129
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Innovate UK
ID : Digital Health Grant (2020)

Auteurs

Fernando Zanghelini (F)

Health Economics Consulting, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7UQ, UK.

Aisling Ponzo (A)

Health Economics Consulting, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7UQ, UK.

Georgios Xydopoulos (G)

Health Economics Consulting, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7UQ, UK.

Richard Fordham (R)

Health Economics Consulting, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7UQ, UK.

Saval Khanal (S)

Health Economics Consulting, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7UQ, UK.

Classifications MeSH