3D-Printable Biopolymers for Socket Preservation Technique: Soft Tissues Response: A Pilot Randomised Clinical Study.

3D printing biopolymers extraction socket socket preservation

Journal

Dentistry journal
ISSN: 2304-6767
Titre abrégé: Dent J (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101716125

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 09 08 2024
revised: 19 09 2024
accepted: 04 10 2024
medline: 25 10 2024
pubmed: 25 10 2024
entrez: 25 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of the present parallel clinical study is to evaluate the efficacy of 3D-printed biopolymers compounded with osteoconductive material (beta-tricalcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite) for soft tissue closure after tooth extraction. this study followed the CONSORT reporting guidelines; 39 patients were treated with socket preservation using 3D-printed biopolymers and randomly divided into 3 groups (Test 1, Test 2, and Control). All cases were treated without flap elevation, careful cleaning and debridement of the sites, and then randomly sealed as follows: In T1, with a 3D-printed disk of poli-D-lactic acid with 10% of hydroxyapatite; in T2, using a 3D-printed disk of poli-ε caprolactone with 20% of β-tricalcium phosphate; and in T3, the socket was left open to heal. At baseline (extraction time) and 6 weeks after extraction, the rate of exposure was evaluated and stratified according to the site (anterior, posterior). No dropouts were observed during the 6 weeks follow-up. All sites underwent uneventful healing with no complications. For posterior teeth, Test 1 and Test 2 showed full healing of the soft tissues with a reduction of the exposed area from 46.5 ± 8.25 mm Both materials used in this study showed evidence to achieve the purpose. Ethical Guidelines: written informed consent was obtained from the participants of the study, as requested by the Ethics Committee for Health Research Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, with the following number: 641/S3/KEPK/FKG/5/2023.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The aim of the present parallel clinical study is to evaluate the efficacy of 3D-printed biopolymers compounded with osteoconductive material (beta-tricalcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite) for soft tissue closure after tooth extraction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
this study followed the CONSORT reporting guidelines; 39 patients were treated with socket preservation using 3D-printed biopolymers and randomly divided into 3 groups (Test 1, Test 2, and Control). All cases were treated without flap elevation, careful cleaning and debridement of the sites, and then randomly sealed as follows: In T1, with a 3D-printed disk of poli-D-lactic acid with 10% of hydroxyapatite; in T2, using a 3D-printed disk of poli-ε caprolactone with 20% of β-tricalcium phosphate; and in T3, the socket was left open to heal. At baseline (extraction time) and 6 weeks after extraction, the rate of exposure was evaluated and stratified according to the site (anterior, posterior).
RESULTS RESULTS
No dropouts were observed during the 6 weeks follow-up. All sites underwent uneventful healing with no complications. For posterior teeth, Test 1 and Test 2 showed full healing of the soft tissues with a reduction of the exposed area from 46.5 ± 8.25 mm
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Both materials used in this study showed evidence to achieve the purpose. Ethical Guidelines: written informed consent was obtained from the participants of the study, as requested by the Ethics Committee for Health Research Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, with the following number: 641/S3/KEPK/FKG/5/2023.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39452449
pii: dj12100321
doi: 10.3390/dj12100321
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Nicola De Angelis (N)

Unit of Prosthodontics and Implant Prosthodontics, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, 16126 Genova, Italy.
Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta 11440, Indonesia.

Paolo Pesce (P)

Unit of Prosthodontics and Implant Prosthodontics, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, 16126 Genova, Italy.

Wiwiek Poedjiastoeti (W)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dean Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta 11440, Indonesia.

Trijani Suwandi (T)

Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta 11440, Indonesia.

Rosalina Tjandrawinata (R)

Department of Dental Materials, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta 11440, Indonesia.

Francesco Bagnasco (F)

Unit of Prosthodontics and Implant Prosthodontics, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, 16126 Genova, Italy.

Maria Menini (M)

Unit of Prosthodontics and Implant Prosthodontics, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, 16126 Genova, Italy.

Classifications MeSH