Ultrasonic-assisted aqueous two-phase extraction and purification of polyphenols from hawk tea (Litsea coreana var. lanuginose): Investigating its impact on starch digestion.
Hyperglycemic
Litsea coreana
Microporous resin
Phenolic compounds
Response surface methodology
Journal
Food chemistry
ISSN: 1873-7072
Titre abrégé: Food Chem
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7702639
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Oct 2024
20 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
21
07
2024
revised:
16
10
2024
accepted:
18
10
2024
medline:
26
10
2024
pubmed:
26
10
2024
entrez:
25
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Hawk tea, a conventional herbal beverage, is renowned for its beneficial properties in enhancing digestion and mitigating hyperglycemic tendencies. However, the extraction methodology for hawk tea polyphenols (HTP) has been understudied thus far, impeding its progress and broader application. To develop an efficient approach for HTP extraction, the present study introduced and optimized the application of ultrasonic-assisted aqueous two-phase extraction. Under optimal extraction conditions, the extraction yield of polyphenols from raw HTP was 7.86 %. During purification, LX-B14 was selected due to the highest adsorption and desorption abilities. Then in an in vitro simulated digestion system, HTP significantly reduced the expected glycemic index, raised the content of resistant starch, and decreased the activities of α-amylase and α-glucosidase, indicating its potential for alleviating starch digestion. Accordingly, the results provide an alternative approach for efficiently obtaining phenolic compounds from hawk tea, facilitating the advanced utilization of HTP within the food industry.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39454434
pii: S0308-8146(24)03377-6
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.141727
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
141727Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.