Unscrambling why plastics aren't detectable in chicken eggs.
Australia
Double-shot Pyr-GC/MS
Enzyme digestion
Microplastics
Poultry birds
Quantification
Journal
Chemosphere
ISSN: 1879-1298
Titre abrégé: Chemosphere
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0320657
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Oct 2024
23 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
11
08
2024
revised:
12
10
2024
accepted:
18
10
2024
medline:
26
10
2024
pubmed:
26
10
2024
entrez:
25
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Several food groups have been reported to contain varying concentrations of plastics. This study was designed to quantitatively investigate for the first time in Australia the presence of plastics in store-bought chicken eggs. Three commonly consumed brands of free-range, free-range organic, barn-laid and backyard (home-laid) chicken egg samples were analyzed for seven common polymers (i.e., polypropylene, polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, polyethylene terephthalate, polystyrene, poly-(methylmethacrylate) and polycarbonate)). Samples were extracted by enzyme digestion and pressurized liquid extraction, followed by quantitative analysis through double-shot microfurnace pyrolysis coupled to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. No plastics were detected at concentrations >limit of detection (LOD) (from 0.04 μg/g for PS to 0.22 μg/g for PVC) in the egg samples analyzed, regardless of brand and category, suggesting limited exposure of Australians to plastics from consuming eggs This study provides valuable baseline data and underscores the importance of continued monitoring to ensure the safety and integrity of food supplies in the face of rising environmental plastic pollution.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39454765
pii: S0045-6535(24)02484-6
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143584
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
143584Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: