Pregnancy loss in individuals with von Willebrand disease and unspecified mucocutaneous bleeding disorders: A multicentre cohort study.
blood coagulation disorders
pregnancy
spontaneous abortion
von Willebrand disease
Journal
Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH
ISSN: 1538-7836
Titre abrégé: J Thromb Haemost
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101170508
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Oct 2024
23 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
19
03
2024
revised:
09
07
2024
accepted:
25
09
2024
medline:
26
10
2024
pubmed:
26
10
2024
entrez:
25
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
While bleeding around pregnancy is well described in von Willebrand disease (VWD), risk of pregnancy loss is less certain. We aimed to describe the frequency of pregnancy loss in females with VWD, compared with those with a similar mucocutaneous bleeding phenotype and no VWD, or compared with non-bleeding disorder controls. Female patients were consecutively approached in 8 specialty bleeding disorder clinics between 2014-2023. The VWD group was defined as having VWF:Antigen (Ag) and VWF:Activity (Act) levels, each <0.50 IU/mL on ≥2 occasions, and a Condensed MCMDM-1 score of ≥4. The non-VWD mucocutaneous bleeding disorder group had VWF levels ≥0.50 IU/mL on ≥2 occasions and a MCMDM-1 score ≥4. A non-bleeding disorder control group was recruited in pregnancy from a low-risk maternity clinic. There were 150 females in the VWD group, 145 in the non-VWD mucocutaneous bleeding disorder group, and 137 in the control group. There was a similar frequency of individuals with ≥1 loss in the VWD group (45.3%, 68/150), the non-VWD group (56.6%, 82/145) (-11.2%, 97.5% CI -24.2, 1.8%), and the non-bleeding disorder control group (37.2%, 51/137) (8.1%, 97.5% CI -4.9%, 21.1%). Using a logistic regression, the odds ratio of pregnancy losses in the VWD group versus non-VWD group was 0.94 (95% CI 0.65, 1.36). All groups experienced more recurrent losses compared to the literature. There was no statistically significant difference in risk of pregnancy loss between females with VWD, females with a similar mucocutaneous bleeding phenotype, and with non-bleeding disorder controls.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
While bleeding around pregnancy is well described in von Willebrand disease (VWD), risk of pregnancy loss is less certain. We aimed to describe the frequency of pregnancy loss in females with VWD, compared with those with a similar mucocutaneous bleeding phenotype and no VWD, or compared with non-bleeding disorder controls.
METHODS
METHODS
Female patients were consecutively approached in 8 specialty bleeding disorder clinics between 2014-2023. The VWD group was defined as having VWF:Antigen (Ag) and VWF:Activity (Act) levels, each <0.50 IU/mL on ≥2 occasions, and a Condensed MCMDM-1 score of ≥4. The non-VWD mucocutaneous bleeding disorder group had VWF levels ≥0.50 IU/mL on ≥2 occasions and a MCMDM-1 score ≥4. A non-bleeding disorder control group was recruited in pregnancy from a low-risk maternity clinic.
RESULTS
RESULTS
There were 150 females in the VWD group, 145 in the non-VWD mucocutaneous bleeding disorder group, and 137 in the control group. There was a similar frequency of individuals with ≥1 loss in the VWD group (45.3%, 68/150), the non-VWD group (56.6%, 82/145) (-11.2%, 97.5% CI -24.2, 1.8%), and the non-bleeding disorder control group (37.2%, 51/137) (8.1%, 97.5% CI -4.9%, 21.1%). Using a logistic regression, the odds ratio of pregnancy losses in the VWD group versus non-VWD group was 0.94 (95% CI 0.65, 1.36). All groups experienced more recurrent losses compared to the literature.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
There was no statistically significant difference in risk of pregnancy loss between females with VWD, females with a similar mucocutaneous bleeding phenotype, and with non-bleeding disorder controls.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39454883
pii: S1538-7836(24)00627-5
doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2024.09.037
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Investigateurs
Elisabeth Ambrose
(E)
Mercy Charles
(M)
Jovana Despot
(J)
Ryan Duggan
(R)
Lydia Elbatarny
(L)
Tegan Evans
(T)
Alexandra Garven
(A)
Julie Grabell
(J)
Dana Ivanco
(D)
Anne Marie Lauf
(AM)
Zhiying Liang
(Z)
Karen Panckeri
(K)
Sarah Rubinstein
(S)
Rebecca Sampat
(R)
Krystina Stutely
(K)
Vidushi Swarup
(V)
Romina Tahmasebi
(R)
Grace Tang
(G)
Ming Yang
(M)
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.