Silver carp experience metabolic and behavioral changes when exposed to water from the Chicago Area Waterway.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Oct 2024
25 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
15
06
2023
accepted:
28
08
2024
medline:
26
10
2024
pubmed:
26
10
2024
entrez:
25
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
One of the hallmarks of invasive species is their propensity to spread. Removing an invasive species after establishment is virtually impossible, and so considerable effort is invested in preventing the range expansion of invaders. Silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) were discovered in the Mississippi River in 1981 and have spread throughout the basin. Despite their propensity to expand, the 'leading edge' in the Illinois River has stalled south of Chicago and has remained stable for a decade. Studies have indicated that contaminants in the Chicago Area Waterway System (CAWS) may be contributing to the lack of upstream movement, but this hypothesis has not been tested. This study used a laboratory setting to quantify the role of contaminants in deterring upstream movement of silver carp within the CAWS. For this, water was collected from the CAWS near the upstream edge of the distribution and transported to a fish culture facility. Silver carp and one native species were exposed to CAWS water, and activity, behavior, avoidance, and metabolic rates were quantified. Results showed that silver carp experience an elevated metabolic cost in CAWS water, along with reductions in swimming behavior. Together, results indicate a role for components of CAWS water at deterring range expansion.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39455602
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71442-y
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-71442-y
doi:
Substances chimiques
Water
059QF0KO0R
Water Pollutants, Chemical
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
24689Subventions
Organisme : U.S. Geological Survey
ID : G21AP10174-00
Organisme : National Institute of Food and Agriculture
ID : ILLU-875-940
Informations de copyright
© 2024. Amy Schneider, AJ Ensbaugh, Cory Suski. Parts of this work were authored by US Federal Government authors and are not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.
Références
Walsberg, G. E. Physiological consequences of microhabitat selection. Habitat Sel. Birds 389–413 (1985).
Huey, R. B. Physiological consequences of habitat selection. Am. Nat. 137, S91–S115 (1991).
doi: 10.1086/285141
Kevin Craig, J. & Crowder, L. B. Factors influencing habitat selection in fishes with a review of marsh ecosystems. In Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology (eds Weinstein, M. P. & Kreeger, D. A.) 241–266 (Springer, 2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47534-0_12 .
doi: 10.1007/0-306-47534-0_12
Bjornn, T. C. & Reiser, D. W. Habitat requirements of salmonids in streams. Am. Fish. Soc. Spec. Publ. 19, 138 (1991).
Hayes, D. B., Ferreri, C. P. & Taylor, W. W. Linking fish habitat to their population dynamics. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53, 383–390 (1996).
doi: 10.1139/f95-273
Wikelski, M. & Ricklefs, R. E. The physiology of life histories. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 479–481 (2001).
doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02279-0
Sadoul, B. & Vijayan, M. M. Stress and Growth. In Biology of Stress in Fish - Fish Physiology 167–205 (Academic Press, 2016).
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802728-8.00005-9
Brown, G. E. & Chivers, D. P. Learning about danger: Chemical alarm cues and the assessment of predation risk by fishes. Fish Aquat. Resour. Ser. (2006).
Sharma, M., Thakur, J. & Verma, S. Behavioural responses in effect to chemical stress in fish: A review. Int. J. Fish. Aquat. Stud. 7, 01–05 (2019).
Tierney, K. B. Chemical avoidance responses of fishes. Aquat. Toxicol. 174, 228–241 (2016).
pubmed: 26970365
doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2016.02.021
Christensen, E. A. F., Andersen, L. E. J., Bergsson, H., Steffensen, J. F. & Killen, S. S. Shuttle-box systems for studying preferred environmental ranges by aquatic animals. Conserv. Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coab051 (2021).
doi: 10.1093/conphys/coab051
pubmed: 34221406
pmcid: 8244567
Bell, G. W. & Eggleston, D. B. Species-specific avoidance responses by blue crabs and fish to chronic and episodic hypoxia. Mar. Biol. 146, 761–770 (2005).
doi: 10.1007/s00227-004-1483-7
Sass, G. G. et al. Invasive bighead and silver carp effects on zooplankton communities in the Illinois River, Illinois, USA. J. Gt. Lakes Res. 40, 911–921 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.jglr.2014.08.010
Tripp, S., Brooks, R., Herzog, D. & Garvey, J. Patterns of fish passage in the Upper Mississippi River. River Res. Appl. 30, 1056–1064 (2014).
doi: 10.1002/rra.2696
Whitledge, G. W. et al. Identification of bighead carp and silver carp early-life environments and inferring lock and dam 19 passage in the upper Mississippi river: insights from otolith chemistry. Biol. Invas. 21, 1007–1020 (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s10530-018-1881-2
Asian Carp Regional Coordinating Committee. FY2020 Asian Carp Action Plan. (2020).
Altenritter, M. E., DeBoer, J. A., Maxson, K. A., Casper, A. F. & Lamer, J. T. Ecosystem responses to aquatic invasive species management: A synthesis of two decades of bigheaded carp suppression in a large river. J. Environ. Manag. 305, 114354 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114354
Battaglin, W. et al. Evaluating the potential role of bioactive chemicals on the distribution of invasive Asian carp upstream and downstream from river mile 278 in the Illinois waterway. Sci. Total Environ. 735, 139458 (2020).
pubmed: 32470670
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139458
Duncker, J. J., Battaglin, W. A., Terrio, P. J. & Barber, L. B. Laboratory results for anthropogenic bioactive chemicals in the Illinois Waterway upstream and downstream of the bigheaded carp population front (2015; ver. 2.0, March 2020). (2020) https://doi.org/10.5066/P9V75F9Q .
Jeffrey, J. D., Jeffries, K. M. & Suski, C. D. Physiological status of silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) in the Illinois River: An assessment of fish at the leading edge of the invasion front. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part D Genom. Proteom. 32, 100614 (2019).
Curtis-Quick, J. A. et al. Why the Stall? Using metabolomics to define the lack of upstream movement of invasive bigheaded carp in the Illinois River. PLOS ONE 16, e0258150 (2021).
pubmed: 34618833
pmcid: 8496817
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258150
Asian Carp Regional Coordinating Committee. 2011 Asian Carp Monitoring and Rapid Response Plan Interim Summary Reports. (2012).
Tucker, E. K. & Suski, C. D. Presence of conspecifics reduces between-individual variation and increases avoidance of multiple stressors in bluegill. Anim. Behav. 158, 15–24 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.10.002
Schneider, E. V. C., Hasler, C. T. & Suski, C. D. Fish behavior in elevated CO2: Implications for a movement barrier in flowing water. Biol. Invas. 20, 1899–1911 (2018).
doi: 10.1007/s10530-018-1669-4
Hasler, C. T. et al. Avoidance of carbon dioxide in flowing water by bighead carp. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 76, 961–969 (2019).
doi: 10.1139/cjfas-2018-0026
Chabot, D., Steffensen, J. F. & Farrell, A. P. The determination of standard metabolic rate in fishes. J. Fish Biol. 88, 81–121 (2016).
pubmed: 26768973
doi: 10.1111/jfb.12845
Rodgers, G. G., Tenzing, P. & Clark, T. D. Experimental methods in aquatic respirometry: The importance of mixing devices and accounting for background respiration. J. Fish Biol. 88, 65–80 (2016).
pubmed: 26768972
doi: 10.1111/jfb.12848
Killen, S. S. et al. Guidelines for reporting methods to estimate metabolic rates by aquatic intermittent-flow respirometry. J. Exp. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.242522 (2021).
doi: 10.1242/jeb.242522
pubmed: 34520540
pmcid: 8467026
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statisical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2022). https://www.R-project.org/
Crawley, M. J. The R Book (Wiley, 2012).
doi: 10.1002/9781118448908
Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N. J., Saveliev, A. A. & Smith, G. M. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R (Springer, 2009).
doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-87458-6
Marsh, D. M. & Hanlon, T. J. Seeing what we want to see: Confirmation bias in animal behavior research. Ethology 113, 1089–1098 (2007).
doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01406.x
Holman, L., Head, M. L., Lanfear, R. & Jennions, M. D. Evidence of experimental bias in the life sciences: Why we need blind data recording. PLOS Biol. 13, e1002190 (2015).
pubmed: 26154287
pmcid: 4496034
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002190
Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N. & Elphick, C. S. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 3–14 (2010).
doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2009.00001.x
Budaev, S. V. Using principal components and factor analysis in animal behaviour research: Caveats and guidelines. Ethology 116, 472–480 (2010).
doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01758.x
Revelle, W. Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research (Northwest. Univ. Evanst, 2015).
Jutfelt, F., Sundin, J., Raby, G. D., Krång, A.-S. & Clark, T. D. Two-current choice flumes for testing avoidance and preference in aquatic animals. Methods Ecol. Evol. 8, 379–390 (2017).
doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12668
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1406.5823 (2014).
Lindstrom, M. J. & Bates, D. M. Nonlinear mixed effects models for repeated measures data. Biometrics 46, 673–687 (1990).
pubmed: 2242409
doi: 10.2307/2532087
Searle, S. R., Speed, F. M. & Milliken, G. A. Population marginal means in the linear model: An alternative to least squares means. Am. Stat. 34, 216–221 (1980).
doi: 10.1080/00031305.1980.10483031
Lenth, R. V. Least-squares means: The R package lsmeans. J. Stat. Softw. 69, 1–33 (2016).
doi: 10.18637/jss.v069.i01
Clarke, A. & Johnston, N. M. Scaling of metabolic rate with body mass and temperature in teleost fish. J. Anim. Ecol. 68, 893–905 (1999).
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00337.x
Clark, T. D. Chapter 8: Respirometry. in Methods for Fish Biology, 2nd edition 247–274 (American Fisheries Society).
Fox, John, et al. "The car package." R Foundation for Statistical Computing 1109 (2007): 1431.
Beitinger, T. L. Behavioral reactions for the assessment of stress in fishes. J. Gt. Lakes Res. 16, 495–528 (1990).
doi: 10.1016/S0380-1330(90)71443-8
Little, E. E. Behavioural measures of environmental stressors in fish. Biol. Indic. Aquat. Ecosyst. Stress 431–472 (2002).
Little, E. E. & Finger, S. E. Swimming behavior as an indicator of sublethal toxicity in fish. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 9, 13–19 (1990).
doi: 10.1002/etc.5620090103
Little, E. E. & DeLonay, A. J. Measures of fish behavior as indicators of sublethal toxicosis during standard toxicity tests. ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ. 1262, 216–233 (1996).
Little, E. E., Archeski, R. D., Flerov, B. A. & Kozlovskaya, V. I. Behavioral indicators of sublethal toxicity in rainbow trout. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 19, 380–385 (1990).
pubmed: 2353837
doi: 10.1007/BF01054982
Fernández-Vega, C., Sancho, E., Ferrando, M. D. & Andreu, E. Thiobencarb-induced changes in acetylcholinesterase activity of the fish Anguilla anguilla. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 72, 55–63 (2002).
doi: 10.1006/pest.2001.2581
da Rosa, J. G. S. et al. Fish aversion and attraction to selected agrichemicals. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 71, 415–422 (2016).
pubmed: 27423874
doi: 10.1007/s00244-016-0300-x
Wechsler, B. Coping and coping strategies: A behavioural view. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 43, 123–134 (1995).
doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(95)00557-9
Koolhaas, J. M. Coping style and immunity in animals: Making sense of individual variation. Brain. Behav. Immun. 22, 662–667 (2008).
pubmed: 18395410
doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2007.11.006
Laursen, D. C., Olsén, H., Ruiz-Gomez, M. L., Winberg, S. & Höglund, E. Behavioural responses to hypoxia provide a non-invasive method for distinguishing between stress coping styles in fish. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 132, 211–216 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.03.011
Castanheira, M. F. et al. Coping styles in farmed fish: Consequences for aquaculture. Rev. Aquac. 9, 23–41 (2017).
doi: 10.1111/raq.12100
Zeng, J., Herbert, N. A. & Lu, W. Differential coping strategies in response to salinity challenge in olive flounder. Front. Physiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01378 (2019).
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01378
pubmed: 32063865
pmcid: 6852876
Brewer, S. K. et al. Behavioral dysfunctions correlate to altered physiology in rainbow trout (Oncorynchus mykiss) exposed to cholinesterase-inhibiting chemicals. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 40, 70–76 (2001).
pubmed: 11116342
doi: 10.1007/s002440010149
Nichols, J. W. et al. Effects of freshwater exposure to arsenic trioxide on the parr-smolt transformation of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 3, 143–149 (1984).
McKenzie, D. J. et al. Complex physiological traits as biomarkers of the sub-lethal toxicological effects of pollutant exposure in fishes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 362, 2043–2059 (2007).
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2100
Gingerich, A. J., Philipp, D. P. & Suski, C. D. Effects of nutritional status on metabolic rate, exercise and recovery in a freshwater fish. J. Comp. Physiol. B 180, 371–384 (2010).
pubmed: 19936760
doi: 10.1007/s00360-009-0419-4
Ackerly, K. L. & Esbaugh, A. J. The additive effects of oil exposure and hypoxia on aerobic performance in red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus). Sci. Total Environ. 737, 140174 (2020).
pubmed: 32783835
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140174
Dai, Q., Hostert, L. E., Rondon, J. K., Cao, Y. & Suski, C. D. Thermal tolerance of fish to heatwaves in agricultural streams: What does not kill you makes you stronger?. Freshw. Biol. 67, 1801–1814 (2022).
doi: 10.1111/fwb.13976
Faught, E., Hernandez-Perez, J., Wilson, J. M. & Vijayan, M. M. Stress in response to environmental changes. Clim. Change Non-Infect. Fish Disord. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781786393982.0136 (2020).
doi: 10.1079/9781786393982.0136
Du, S. N. N. et al. Metabolic implications of exposure to wastewater effluent in bluegill sunfish. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 224, 108562 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2019.108562
Baum, G. et al. Metabolic performance of the coral reef fish Siganus guttatus exposed to combinations of water borne diesel, an anionic surfactant and elevated temperature in Indonesia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 110, 735–746 (2016).
pubmed: 26965092
doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.02.078
Rowe, C. L., Hopkins, W. A., Zehnder, C. & Congdon, J. D. Metabolic costs incurred by crayfish (Procambarus acutus) in a trace element-polluted habitat: further evidence of similar responses among diverse taxonomic groups. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 129, 275–283 (2001).
doi: 10.1016/S1532-0456(01)00204-6
Clark, T. D., Sandblom, E. & Jutfelt, F. Aerobic scope measurements of fishes in an era of climate change: Respirometry, relevance and recommendations. J. Exp. Biol. 216, 2771–2782 (2013).
pubmed: 23842625
doi: 10.1242/jeb.084251
Zolderdo, A. J. et al. Freshwater protected areas can preserve high-performance phenotypes in populations of a popular sportfish. Conserv. Physiol. 11, coad004 (2023).
pubmed: 36937992
pmcid: 10019442
doi: 10.1093/conphys/coad004
Duncan, M. I., Bates, A. E., James, N. C. & Potts, W. M. Exploitation may influence the climate resilience of fish populations through removing high performance metabolic phenotypes. Sci. Rep. 9, 11437 (2019).
pubmed: 31391481
pmcid: 6685998
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47395-y
Kates, D., Dennis, C., Noatch, M. R. & Suski, C. D. Responses of native and invasive fishes to carbon dioxide: Potential for a nonphysical barrier to fish dispersal. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 69, 1748–1759 (2012).
doi: 10.1139/f2012-102
Dennis, C. E., Adhikari, S. & Suski, C. D. Molecular and behavioral responses of early-life stage fishes to elevated carbon dioxide. Biol. Invas. 17, 3133–3151 (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s10530-015-0941-0
Tix, J. A. et al. Temperature dependent effects of carbon dioxide on avoidance behaviors in bigheaded carps. Biol. Invasions 20, 3095–3105 (2018).
doi: 10.1007/s10530-018-1761-9
Hung, T.-C. et al. Temperature and salinity preferences of endangered Delta Smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus, Actinopterygii, Osmeridae). Sci. Rep. 12, 16558 (2022).
pubmed: 36192440
pmcid: 9530165
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20934-w
Tix, J. A., Hasler, C. T., Sullivan, C., Jeffrey, J. D. & Suski, C. D. Elevated carbon dioxide has limited acute effects on Lepomis macrochirus behaviour. J. Fish Biol. 90, 751–772 (2017).
pubmed: 27781274
doi: 10.1111/jfb.13188
Jacobsen, L. et al. Effect of boat noise and angling on lake fish behaviour. J. Fish Biol. 84, 1768–1780 (2014).
pubmed: 24813930
doi: 10.1111/jfb.12395
Hansen, J. A., Marr, J. C. A., Lipton, J., Cacela, D. & Bergman, H. L. Differences in neurobehavioral responses of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) exposed to copper and cobalt: Behavioral avoidance. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 18, 1972–1978 (1999).
Happel, A. & Gallagher, D. Decreases in wastewater pollutants increased fish diversity of Chicago’s waterways. Sci. Total Environ. 824, 153776 (2022).
pubmed: 35150671
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153776
Gibson-Reinemer, D. K. et al. Ecological recovery of a river fish assemblage following the implementation of the Clean Water Act. BioScience 67, 957–970 (2017).
doi: 10.1093/biosci/bix110
Parker, J., Epifanio, J., Casper, A. & Cao, Y. The effects of improved water quality on fish assemblages in a heavily modified large river system. River Res. Appl. 32, 992–1007 (2016).
doi: 10.1002/rra.2917
Barton, K. & Barton, M. K. Package ‘mumin’. Version1.18 2015, 439 (2015).