Nested patterns of commensals and endosymbionts in microbial communities of mosquito vectors.
Escherichia-Shigella
Wolbachia
Community assembly
Mosquitoes
Nestedness theory
Journal
BMC microbiology
ISSN: 1471-2180
Titre abrégé: BMC Microbiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100966981
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Oct 2024
26 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
19
07
2024
accepted:
21
10
2024
medline:
26
10
2024
pubmed:
26
10
2024
entrez:
25
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Mosquitoes serve as vectors for numerous pathogens, posing significant health risks to humans and animals. Understanding the complex interactions within mosquito microbiota is crucial for deciphering vector-pathogen dynamics and developing effective disease management strategies. Here, we investigated the nested patterns of Wolbachia endosymbionts and Escherichia-Shigella within the microbiota of laboratory-reared Culex pipiens f. molestus and Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes. We hypothesized that Wolbachia would exhibit a structured pattern reflective of its co-evolved relationship with both mosquito species, while Escherichia-Shigella would display a more dynamic pattern influenced by environmental factors. Our analysis revealed different microbial compositions between the two mosquito species, although some microorganisms were common to both. Network analysis revealed distinct community structures and interaction patterns for these bacteria in the microbiota of each mosquito species. Escherichia-Shigella appeared prominently within major network modules in both mosquito species, particularly in module P4 of Cx. pipiens f. molestus, interacting with 93 nodes, and in module Q3 of Cx. quinquefasciatus, interacting with 161 nodes, sharing 55 nodes across both species. On the other hand, Wolbachia appeared in disparate modules: module P3 in Cx. pipiens f. molestus and a distinct module with a single additional taxon in Cx. quinquefasciatus, showing species-specific interactions and no shared taxa. Through computer simulations, we evaluated how the removal of Wolbachia or Escherichia-Shigella affects network robustness. In Cx. pipiens f. molestus, removal of Wolbachia led to a decrease in network connectivity, while Escherichia-Shigella removal had a minimal impact. Conversely, in Cx. quinquefasciatus, removal of Escherichia-Shigella resulted in decreased network stability, whereas Wolbachia removal had minimal effect. Contrary to our hypothesis, the findings indicate that Wolbachia displays a more dynamic pattern of associations within the microbiota of Culex pipiens f. molestus and Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes, than Escherichia-Shigella. The differential effects on network robustness upon Wolbachia or Escherichia-Shigella removal suggest that these bacteria play distinct roles in maintaining community stability within the microbiota of the two mosquito species.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Mosquitoes serve as vectors for numerous pathogens, posing significant health risks to humans and animals. Understanding the complex interactions within mosquito microbiota is crucial for deciphering vector-pathogen dynamics and developing effective disease management strategies. Here, we investigated the nested patterns of Wolbachia endosymbionts and Escherichia-Shigella within the microbiota of laboratory-reared Culex pipiens f. molestus and Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes. We hypothesized that Wolbachia would exhibit a structured pattern reflective of its co-evolved relationship with both mosquito species, while Escherichia-Shigella would display a more dynamic pattern influenced by environmental factors.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Our analysis revealed different microbial compositions between the two mosquito species, although some microorganisms were common to both. Network analysis revealed distinct community structures and interaction patterns for these bacteria in the microbiota of each mosquito species. Escherichia-Shigella appeared prominently within major network modules in both mosquito species, particularly in module P4 of Cx. pipiens f. molestus, interacting with 93 nodes, and in module Q3 of Cx. quinquefasciatus, interacting with 161 nodes, sharing 55 nodes across both species. On the other hand, Wolbachia appeared in disparate modules: module P3 in Cx. pipiens f. molestus and a distinct module with a single additional taxon in Cx. quinquefasciatus, showing species-specific interactions and no shared taxa. Through computer simulations, we evaluated how the removal of Wolbachia or Escherichia-Shigella affects network robustness. In Cx. pipiens f. molestus, removal of Wolbachia led to a decrease in network connectivity, while Escherichia-Shigella removal had a minimal impact. Conversely, in Cx. quinquefasciatus, removal of Escherichia-Shigella resulted in decreased network stability, whereas Wolbachia removal had minimal effect.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Contrary to our hypothesis, the findings indicate that Wolbachia displays a more dynamic pattern of associations within the microbiota of Culex pipiens f. molestus and Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes, than Escherichia-Shigella. The differential effects on network robustness upon Wolbachia or Escherichia-Shigella removal suggest that these bacteria play distinct roles in maintaining community stability within the microbiota of the two mosquito species.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39455905
doi: 10.1186/s12866-024-03593-x
pii: 10.1186/s12866-024-03593-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
434Subventions
Organisme : Collectivité de Corse
ID : SGCE-RAPPORT No. 0300
Organisme : Lietuvos Mokslo Taryba
ID : S-MIP-22-52
Organisme : Agence Nationale de la Recherche
ID : ANR-10-LABX-62-IBEID
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Caminade C, McIntyre KM, Jones AE. Impact of recent and future climate change on vector-borne diseases. Ann N Y Acad Sci janv. 2019;1436(1):157–73.
doi: 10.1111/nyas.13950
Moreira LA, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Jeffery JA, Lu G, Pyke AT, Hedges LM, et al. A Wolbachia symbiont in Aedes aegypti limits infection with dengue, Chikungunya, and Plasmodium. Cell 24 déc. 2009;139(7):1268–78.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.042
Simón F, González-Miguel J, Diosdado A, Gómez PJ, Morchón R, Kartashev V. The complexity of zoonotic Filariasis Episystem and its consequences: a multidisciplinary view. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:6436130.
pubmed: 28642878
pmcid: 5469992
doi: 10.1155/2017/6436130
Huang Y-JS, Higgs S, Vanlandingham DL. Emergence and re-emergence of mosquito-borne arboviruses. Curr Opin Virol févr. 2019;34:104–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2019.01.001
El-Sayed A, Aleya L, Kamel M. Microbiota’s role in health and diseases. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Juill. 2021;28(28):36967–83.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14593-z
Romoli O, Schönbeck JC, Hapfelmeier S, Gendrin M. Production of germ-free mosquitoes via transient colonisation allows stage-specific investigation of host-microbiota interactions. Nat Commun. 11 févr. 2021;12(1):942.
Aželytė J, Wu-Chuang A, Žiegytė R, Platonova E, Mateos-Hernandez L, Maye J, et al. Anti-microbiota vaccine reduces avian malaria infection within mosquito vectors. Front Immunol. 2022;13:841835.
pubmed: 35309317
pmcid: 8928750
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.841835
Ren Z, Li H, Luo W. Unraveling the mystery of antibiotic resistance genes in green and red Antarctic snow. Sci Total Environ 10 mars. 2024;915:170148.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170148
Seabourn PS, Weber DE, Spafford H, Medeiros MCI. Aedes albopictus microbiome derives from environmental sources and partitions across distinct host tissues. Microbiologyopen juin. 2023;12(3):e1364.
doi: 10.1002/mbo3.1364
Cobo-López S, Gupta VK, Sung J, Guimerà R, Sales-Pardo M. Stochastic block models reveal a robust nested pattern in healthy human gut microbiomes. PNAS Nexus Juill. 2022;1(3):pgac055.
doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac055
Song C, Rohr RP, Saavedra S. Why are some plant-pollinator networks more nested than others? J Anim Ecol Oct. 2017;86(6):1417–24.
doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12749
Werren JH, Baldo L, Clark ME. Wolbachia: master manipulators of invertebrate biology. Nat Rev Microbiol oct. 2008;6(10):741–51.
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1969
Johnson KN. The impact of Wolbachia on Virus infection in mosquitoes. Viruses 4 nov. 2015;7(11):5705–17.
doi: 10.3390/v7112903
Torres R, Hernandez E, Flores V, Ramirez JL, Joyce AL. Wolbachia in mosquitoes from the Central Valley of California, USA. Parasit Vectors 10 nov. 2020;13(1):558.
doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04429-z
Simhadri RK, Fast EM, Guo R, Schultz MJ, Vaisman N, Ortiz L, et al. The gut commensal microbiome of Drosophila melanogaster is modified by the Endosymbiont Wolbachia. mSphere. 2017;2:e00287–17.
pubmed: 28932814
pmcid: 5597968
doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00287-17
Detcharoen M, Jiggins FM, Schlick-Steiner BC, Steiner FM. Wolbachia endosymbiotic bacteria alter the gut microbiome in the fly Drosophila Nigrosparsa. J Invertebr Pathol. 2023;198:107915.
pubmed: 36958642
doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2023.107915
Duan X-Z, Sun J-T, Wang L-T, Shu X-H, Guo Y, Keiichiro M, et al. Recent infection by Wolbachia alters microbial communities in wild Laodelphax striatellus populations. Microbiome. 2020;8:104.
pubmed: 32616041
pmcid: 7333401
doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00878-x
Thongsripong P, Chandler JA, Green AB, Kittayapong P, Wilcox BA, Kapan DD, et al. Mosquito vector-associated microbiota: metabarcoding bacteria and eukaryotic symbionts across habitat types in Thailand endemic for dengue and other arthropod‐borne diseases. Ecol Evol. 2018;8:1352–68.
pubmed: 29375803
doi: 10.1002/ece3.3676
Chandler JA, Liu RM, Bennett SN. RNA shotgun metagenomic sequencing of northern California (USA) mosquitoes uncovers viruses, bacteria, and fungi. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:185.
pubmed: 25852655
pmcid: 4371751
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00185
Hegde S, Khanipov K, Albayrak L, Golovko G, Pimenova M, Saldaña MA, et al. Microbiome Interaction Networks and Community structure from Laboratory-Reared and Field-Collected Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, and Culex quinquefasciatus Mosquito vectors. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2160.
pubmed: 30250462
pmcid: 6140713
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02160
Žiegytė R, Bernotienė R, Bukauskaitė D, Palinauskas V, Iezhova T, Valkiūnas G. Complete sporogony of Plasmodium relictum (lineages pSGS1 and pGRW11) in mosquito Culex pipiens pipiens form molestus, with implications to avian malaria epidemiology. J Parasitol déc. 2014;100(6):878–82.
doi: 10.1645/13-469.1
Davis NM, Proctor DM, Holmes SP, Relman DA, Callahan BJ. Simple statistical identification and removal of contaminant sequences in marker-gene and metagenomics data. Microbiome. 2018;6:226.
pubmed: 30558668
pmcid: 6298009
doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0605-2
Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol août. 2019;37(8):852–7.
doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9
Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods Juill. 2016;13(7):581–3.
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869
Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 15 Juill. 2002;30(14):3059–66.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf436
Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2–approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 10 mars. 2010;5(3):e9490.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490
Bokulich NA, Kaehler BD, Rideout JR, Dillon M, Bolyen E, Knight R, et al. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 17 mai. 2018;6(1):90.
doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0470-z
Yarza P, Yilmaz P, Pruesse E, Glöckner FO, Ludwig W, Schleifer K-H, et al. Uniting the classification of cultured and uncultured bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene sequences. Nat Rev Microbiol Sept. 2014;12(9):635–45.
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3330
Shannon CE. A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell Syst Tech J. 1948;27:379–423.
doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
Pielou EC. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J Theoretical Biology J Theoretical Biology. 1966;13:131–44.
doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(66)90013-0
Faith DP. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol Conserv. 1992;61(1):1–10.
doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(92)91201-3
DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol Juill. 2006;72(7):5069–72.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.03006-05
Bray JR, Curtis JT. An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr. 1957;27(4):325–49.
doi: 10.2307/1942268
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 25 – 7 [Internet]. 2020; https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2022;R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Fernandes AD, Reid JN, Macklaim JM, McMurrough TA, Edgell DR, Gloor GB. Unifying the analysis of high-throughput sequencing datasets: characterizing RNA-seq, 16S rRNA gene sequencing and selective growth experiments by compositional data analysis. Microbiome. 2014;2:15.
pubmed: 24910773
pmcid: 4030730
doi: 10.1186/2049-2618-2-15
Aitchison J, Methodological B.). 1982.
Friedman J, Alm EJ. Inferring correlation networks from genomic survey data. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(9):e1002687.
pubmed: 23028285
pmcid: 3447976
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002687
Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M. Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. WebAtlas. 2009.
Röttjers L, Vandeputte D, Raes J, Faust K. Null-model-based network comparison reveals core associations. ISME Commun 16 Juill. 2021;1(1):36.
doi: 10.1038/s43705-021-00036-w
Anaconda Inc. Anaconda Software Distribution. Anaconda Documentation [Internet]. 2020; https://docs.anaconda.com/
Peschel S, Müller CL, von Mutius E, Boulesteix A-L, Depner M. NetCoMi: network construction and comparison for microbiome data in R. Brief Bioinform 20 Juill. 2021;22(4):bbaa290.
doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaa290
Lhomme S. Analyse spatiale de la structure des reseaux techniques dans un contexte de risques. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography. 2015.
Csárdi G, Nepusz T, Csárdi. Gábor and Tamás Nepusz. The igraph software package for complex network research. (2006). InterJournal Complex Syst. 2006;1695(5):1–9.
Mateos-Hernández L, Obregón D, Maye J, Borneres J, Versille N, de la Fuente J, et al. Anti-tick Microbiota Vaccine impacts Ixodes ricinus performance during feeding. Vaccines (Basel) 21 nov. 2020;8(4):702.
Mateos-Hernández L, Obregón D, Wu-Chuang A, Maye J, Bornères J, Versillé N, et al. Anti-microbiota vaccines modulate the Tick Microbiome in a taxon-specific manner. Front Immunol. 2021;12:704621.
pubmed: 34322135
pmcid: 8312226
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.704621
Minard G, Mavingui P, Moro CV. Diversity and function of bacterial microbiota in the mosquito holobiont. Parasit Vectors 20 mai. 2013;6:146.
doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-146
Douglas AE. The microbial dimension in insect nutritional ecology. Funct Ecol. 2009;23(1):38–47.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01442.x
Muturi EJ, Lagos-Kutz D, Dunlap C, Ramirez JL, Rooney AP, Hartman GL et al. Mosquito microbiota cluster by host sampling location. Parasit Vectors. 14 août. 2018;11(1):468.
Dickson LB, Jiolle D, Minard G, Moltini-Conclois I, Volant S, Ghozlane A, et al. Carryover effects of larval exposure to different environmental bacteria drive adult trait variation in a mosquito vector. Sci Adv août. 2017;3(8):e1700585.
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1700585
da Silva H, Oliveira TMP, Sallum MAM. nov. Bacterial Community Diversity and Bacterial Interaction Network in Eight Mosquito Species. Genes (Basel). 2022 Nov 7;13(11):2052. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13112052 . PMID: 36360289; PMCID: PMC9690548.
Banerjee S, Schlaeppi K, van der Heijden MGA. Keystone taxa as drivers of microbiome structure and functioning. Nat Rev Microbiol Sept. 2018;16(9):567–76.
doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0024-1
Tchioffo MT, Abate L, Boissière A, Nsango SE, Gimonneau G, Berry A, et al. An epidemiologically successful Escherichia coli sequence type modulates Plasmodium falciparum infection in the mosquito midgut. Infect Genet Evol Sept. 2016;43:22–30.
doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.05.002
Boissière A, Tchioffo MT, Bachar D, Abate L, Marie A, Nsango SE, et al. Midgut microbiota of the malaria mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae and interactions with Plasmodium falciparum infection. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(5):e1002742.
pubmed: 22693451
pmcid: 3364955
doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002742
Aranda-Díaz A, Willis L, Nguyen TH, Ho P-Y, Vila J, Thomsen T et al. Assembly of gut-derived bacterial communities follows « early-bird » resource utilization dynamics. bioRxiv. 14 janv 2023;2023.01.13.523996.
Rasgon JL, Scott TW. Wolbachia and cytoplasmic incompatibility in the California Culex pipiens mosquito species complex: parameter estimates and infection dynamics in natural populations. Genet déc. 2003;165(4):2029–38.
doi: 10.1093/genetics/165.4.2029
Lee JM, Yek SH, Wilson RF, Rahman S. Characterization of the Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) holobiome: bacterial composition across land use type and mosquito sex in Malaysia. Acta Trop. 2020;212:105683.
pubmed: 32888935
doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105683
Bian G, Xu Y, Lu P, Xie Y, Xi Z. The endosymbiotic bacterium Wolbachia induces resistance to dengue virus in Aedes aegypti. PLoS Pathog 1 avr. 2010;6(4):e1000833.
doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000833
Coyte KZ, Rao C, Rakoff-Nahoum S, Foster KR. Ecological rules for the assembly of microbiome communities. PLoS Biol févr. 2021;19(2):e3001116.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001116
Coyte KZ, Schluter J, Foster KR. The ecology of the microbiome: networks, competition, and stability. Sci 6 nov. 2015;350(6261):663–6.