Soil Microorganism Interactions under Biological Fumigations Compared with Chemical Fumigation.

biological fumigation chemical fumigation consecutive cropping problems eggplant fungal and bacterial communities soil productivity

Journal

Microorganisms
ISSN: 2076-2607
Titre abrégé: Microorganisms
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101625893

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 04 09 2024
revised: 29 09 2024
accepted: 08 10 2024
medline: 26 10 2024
pubmed: 26 10 2024
entrez: 26 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Biological fumigation, a potential alternative to chemical fumigation, shows a wide range of prospective applications. In this study, we carried out biological fumigation experiments to evaluate its effect on alleviating consecutive cropping problems (CRPs) when compared with chemical fumigation. We designed five treatments, namely, CR (no treatment), LN (chemical fumigation with lime nitrogen), Ta (fumigation with marigold), Ra (fumigation with radish), and Br (fumigation with mustard), for soils for replanting eggplant and measured the crop's growth status, soil bacterial and fungal communities, and soil physicochemical properties. The results showed that the Br and Ra treatments formed similar microbial communities, while the Ta treatment formed unique microbial communities. The genera Olpidiomycota and Rozellomycota could be used as indicator species for the transformation process of soil microbial communities after the Br and Ta treatments, respectively. When compared with the CR and LN treatments, the soil's physicochemical properties were optimized under the Br treatment, and the soil organic matter content increased by 64.26% and 79.22%, respectively. Moreover, under the Br treatment, the soil's biological properties enhanced the bacterial and fungal alpha diversity, and the saprotrophic fungi increased with the depletion of pathotrophic fungi, while some specific probiotic microorganisms (such as Olpidiomycota, Microascales, Among these three biological fumigation methods, the Br pre-treatment was the best way to alleviate the crop's CRPs and may be a good substitute for chemical fumigation in some situations. However, the Ta treatment also had some risks, such as the loss of land quality and reduced productivity.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Biological fumigation, a potential alternative to chemical fumigation, shows a wide range of prospective applications. In this study, we carried out biological fumigation experiments to evaluate its effect on alleviating consecutive cropping problems (CRPs) when compared with chemical fumigation.
METHODS METHODS
We designed five treatments, namely, CR (no treatment), LN (chemical fumigation with lime nitrogen), Ta (fumigation with marigold), Ra (fumigation with radish), and Br (fumigation with mustard), for soils for replanting eggplant and measured the crop's growth status, soil bacterial and fungal communities, and soil physicochemical properties.
RESULTS RESULTS
The results showed that the Br and Ra treatments formed similar microbial communities, while the Ta treatment formed unique microbial communities. The genera Olpidiomycota and Rozellomycota could be used as indicator species for the transformation process of soil microbial communities after the Br and Ta treatments, respectively. When compared with the CR and LN treatments, the soil's physicochemical properties were optimized under the Br treatment, and the soil organic matter content increased by 64.26% and 79.22%, respectively. Moreover, under the Br treatment, the soil's biological properties enhanced the bacterial and fungal alpha diversity, and the saprotrophic fungi increased with the depletion of pathotrophic fungi, while some specific probiotic microorganisms (such as Olpidiomycota, Microascales,
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Among these three biological fumigation methods, the Br pre-treatment was the best way to alleviate the crop's CRPs and may be a good substitute for chemical fumigation in some situations. However, the Ta treatment also had some risks, such as the loss of land quality and reduced productivity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39458353
pii: microorganisms12102044
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12102044
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 31860549
Organisme : Key research project of Gansu province of China
ID : 22YF7NA108

Auteurs

Hui Li (H)

College of Horticulture, Gansu Agricultural University, Silver Beach Road Street, Lanzhou 730070, China.

Huali Man (H)

College of Horticulture, Gansu Agricultural University, Silver Beach Road Street, Lanzhou 730070, China.

Jia Han (J)

College of Horticulture, Gansu Agricultural University, Silver Beach Road Street, Lanzhou 730070, China.

Xixia Jia (X)

Lanzhou New District Modern Agricultural Development Research Institute Co., Lanzhou 730070, China.

Li Wang (L)

College of Horticulture, Gansu Agricultural University, Silver Beach Road Street, Lanzhou 730070, China.

Hongyu Yang (H)

College of Horticulture, Gansu Agricultural University, Silver Beach Road Street, Lanzhou 730070, China.

Guiying Shi (G)

College of Horticulture, Gansu Agricultural University, Silver Beach Road Street, Lanzhou 730070, China.

Classifications MeSH