Impact of photobiomodulation in alveolar ridge preservation and implant stability after a dental extraction: a systematic review.
Alveolar bone preservation
Immediate extraction-implantation
Photobiomodulation
Systematic review
Journal
Lasers in medical science
ISSN: 1435-604X
Titre abrégé: Lasers Med Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8611515
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Oct 2024
26 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
12
06
2024
accepted:
15
10
2024
medline:
26
10
2024
pubmed:
26
10
2024
entrez:
26
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The bone volume preservation after dental extraction is challenging in case of implant rehabilitation for functional and aesthetics results. Photobiomodulation (or LLLT) is used in medicine for its properties of accelerating the healing process. The aim of the systematic review was to determine if the use of photobiomodulation had an impact on implant stability and on alveolar bone healing, either in quality or in quantity. A systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines was conducted on the databases PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus and Google Scholar. The review was registered on Prospero under the number CRD42023467581. 414 articles were screened, of which 12 were selected for the review. In 10 of the 12 articles, LLLT seemed to show a positive impact on bone healing and implant stability. Regarding alveolar preservation, 6 out of 8 studies found statistically significant results. Regarding implant stability, 3 out of the 4 articles found a statistically significant impact of photobiomodulation versus control group. Despite the great heterogeneity of the studies, some LLLT protocols seemed consensual: the use of a Ga-Al-As laser with an emission over 800 nm with a continuous emission consisting of 3 to 4 sessions each with a duration of 4 to 5 min, on a sole application point. The use of photobiomodulation seemed to inhance the alveolar bone healing after a dental extraction, and the implant stability in case of immediate extraction-implantation. Further randomized controlled trials with a placebo group seem mandatory to corroborate the results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39460822
doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04215-8
pii: 10.1007/s10103-024-04215-8
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dental Implants
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
264Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Atwood DA (1963) Postextraction changes in the adult mandible as illustrated by microradiographs of midsagittal sections and serial cephalometric roentgenograms. J Prosthet Dent 13(5):810–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(63)90225-7
doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(63)90225-7
Van Der Weijden F, Dell’Acqua F, Slot DE (2009) Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 36(12):1048–1058. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1600-051X.2009.01482.X
doi: 10.1111/J.1600-051X.2009.01482.X
pubmed: 19929956
Couso-Queiruga E, Stuhr S, Tattan M, Chambrone L, Avila-Ortiz G (2021) Post-extraction dimensional changes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 48(1):127–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/JCPE.13390
doi: 10.1111/JCPE.13390
Stellingsma K, Raghoebar GM, Visser A, Vissink A, Meijer HJA (2014) The extremely resorbed mandible, 10-year results of a randomized controlled trial on 3 treatment strategies. Clin Oral Implants Res 25(8):926–932. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12184
doi: 10.1111/clr.12184
pubmed: 23638947
Urban IA, Montero E, Monje A, Sanz-Sánchez I (2019) Effectiveness of vertical ridge augmentation interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 46(S21):319–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13061
doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13061
pubmed: 30667522
Hameed MH, Gul M, Ghafoor R, Khan FR (2019) Vertical ridge gain with various bone augmentation techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthodont 28(4):421–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13028
doi: 10.1111/jopr.13028
pubmed: 30719781
Pérez-González F, Molinero-Mourelle P, Sánchez-Labrador L et al (2020) Assessment of clinical outcomes and histomorphometric findings in alveolar ridge augmentation procedures with allogeneic bone block grafts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 25(2):e291–e298. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23353
doi: 10.4317/medoral.23353
pubmed: 32040468
pmcid: 7103446
Romito GA, Villar CC, Sapata VM et al (2022) Autogenous bone block versus collagenated xenogeneic bone block in the reconstruction of the atrophic alveolar ridge: a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 49(11):1158–1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13701
doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13701
pubmed: 35833539
Akhil KP, Pramashivaiah R, Prabhuji MLV et al (2023) Alveolar ridge augmentation assessment using a minimalistic approach, with and without low-level laser therapy (LLLT)—a comparative clinical trial. Medicina (Mex) 59(6):1178. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061178
doi: 10.3390/medicina59061178
Avila-Ortiz G, Elangovan S, Kramer KWO, Blanchette D, Dawson DV (2014) Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 93(10):950. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514541127
doi: 10.1177/0022034514541127
pubmed: 24966231
pmcid: 4293706
Willenbacher M, Al-Nawas B, Berres M, Kämmerer PW, Schiegnitz E (2016) The effects of alveolar ridge preservation: a meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 18(6):1248–1268. https://doi.org/10.1111/CID.12364
doi: 10.1111/CID.12364
pubmed: 26132885
dos Santos Canellas JV, Soares BN, Ritto FG et al (2021) What grafting materials produce greater alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction? A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg. 49(11):1064–1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCMS.2021.06.005
doi: 10.1016/J.JCMS.2021.06.005
Solyom E, Szalai E, Czumbel ML et al (2023) The use of autogenous tooth bone graft is an efficient method of alveolar ridge preservation – meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Oral Health 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S12903-023-02930-2
Zein R, Selting W, Hamblin MR (2018) Review of light parameters and photobiomodulation efficacy: dive into complexity. J Biomed Opt 23(12):1. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.23.12.120901
doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.23.12.120901
pubmed: 30550048
Kheiri A, Amid R, Kheiri L, Namdari M, Mojahedi M, Kadkhodazadeh M (2020) Effect of low- level laser therapy on bone regeneration of critical-size bone defects: a systematic review of in vivo studies and meta-analysis. Arch Oral Biol 117:104782. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ARCHORALBIO.2020.104782
doi: 10.1016/J.ARCHORALBIO.2020.104782
pubmed: 32535292
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg 88:105906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906
pubmed: 33789826
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M et al (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 4(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
pubmed: 25554246
pmcid: 4320440
Howick J, Chalmers I, Glasziou P et al (n.d.) Explanation of the 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) Levels of Evidence (Background Document)”. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-evidence/ocebm-levels-of-evidence . Accessed 11 Jul 2023
Higgins JP, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RJ, Sterne JA. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current Accessed 30 Oct 2023
Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC et al (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919
Mozzati M, Martinasso G, Cocero N et al (2012) Superpulsed laser therapy on healing process after tooth extraction in patients waiting for liver transplantation. Lasers Med Sci 27(2):353–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0880-z
doi: 10.1007/s10103-010-0880-z
pubmed: 21279404
Romão M, Marques M, Cortes A, Horliana A, Moreira M, Lascala C (2015) Micro-computed tomography and histomorphometric analysis of human alveolar bone repair induced by laser phototherapy: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/Clinical
Križaj Dumić A, Pajk F, Olivi G (2021) The effect of post-extraction socket preservation laser treatment on bone density 4 months after extraction: randomized controlled trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 23(3):309–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12991
doi: 10.1111/cid.12991
pubmed: 33686771
pmcid: 8359241
Pereira DA, Mendes PGJ, de Souza Santos S, de Rezende Barbosa GL, e Pessoa RS, de Oliveira GJPL (2022) Effect of the association of infra-red and red wavelength photobiomodulation therapy on the healing of post-extraction sockets of third lower molars: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci 37(5):2479–2487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-022-03511-5
doi: 10.1007/s10103-022-03511-5
pubmed: 35079918
Rosero KAV, Sampaio RMF, Deboni MCZ et al (2020) Photobiomodulation as an adjunctive therapy for alveolar socket preservation: a preliminary study in humans. Lasers Med Sci 35(8):1711–1720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-02962-y
doi: 10.1007/s10103-020-02962-y
pubmed: 31970564
Abdel Mageed H, Hanna R, Benedicenti S (2019) The effect of diode 980nm laser therapy on socket preservation: a preliminary split mouth randomised controlled clinical study. J Dent Oral Disord 5(2). ISSN: 2572–7710
Anwar Abd-Elhaleem Othman M, Abbas Zaky A, Mohamed Khalil N, Abdullah Eltayeb E (2023) Comparison between the effect of (650 nm) and (810 nm) diode laser photobiomodulation as an adjunctive therapy for alveolar socket preservation: a clinical and radiographic study. J Pharm Negat Results 14(3). https://doi.org/10.47750/pnr.2023.14.03.113
Nica DF, Heredea ER, Todea DCM (2019) Alveolus soft and bone tissue regeneration after laser biomodulation - a histological study. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 60(4):1269–1273
pubmed: 32239104
Romão MMA, Marques MM, Cortes ARG, Horliana ACRT, Moreira MS, Lascala CA (2015) Effect of laser phototherapy on human alveolar bone repair: micro tomographic and histomorphometrical analysis. In: Biophotonics South America. SPIE 9531:95312N. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2181041
Fahmy NM, Abdulla NS, Khalil MM, AbdelHakim AA (2018) Evaluation of low-level laser therapy on the stability of implants using resonance frequency analysis (clinical study). Alex Dent J 43(2):94–100. https://doi.org/10.21608/adjalexu.2018.57638
doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2018.57638
Fahim A, Shehab A, El-Beialy W, Abozekry A (2022) Effect of Low-level diode laser bio-stimulation on implant stability before, during and after immediate implants in mandibular molars. (A Randomized Clinical Study). Future Dent J 87–94. https://doi.org/10.54623/fdj.8023
Edrees M, Al Ashmawy M, Abo-Aldhab H (2022) Evaluation of the osteogenic efficacy of low-level laser on immediate dental implant. Al-Azhar Assiut Dent J 5(1):39–47. https://doi.org/10.21608/aadj.2022.234713
doi: 10.21608/aadj.2022.234713
Bozkaya S, Uraz A, Guler B, Kahraman SA, Turhan BB (2021) The stability of implants and microbiological effects following photobiomodulation therapy with one-stage placement: a randomized, controlled, single-blinded, and split-mouth clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 23(3):329–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12999
doi: 10.1111/cid.12999
pubmed: 33851765
Fahd A, Ghaffar Y, El-Shenawy H, Khalifa M, Dahaba M (2017) Bone changes in dental implant combined with laser therapy: a split mouth study. https://doi.org/10.7537/marsrsj090717.11
Kulkarni S, Meer M, George R (2019) Efficacy of photobiomodulation on accelerating bone healing after tooth extraction: a systematic review. Lasers Med Sci 34(4):685–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10103-018-2641-3/METRICS
doi: 10.1007/S10103-018-2641-3/METRICS
pubmed: 30311084
Lemes CHJ, de OliveiradaRosa WL, Sonego CL, Lemes BJ, Moraes RR, da Silva AF (2019) Does laser therapy improve the wound healing process after tooth extraction? A systematic review. Wound Repair Regen 27(1):102–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12678
doi: 10.1111/wrr.12678
pubmed: 30324666
Amaroli A, Colombo E, Zekiy A, Aicardi S, Benedicenti S, De Angelis N (2020) Interaction between laser light and osteoblasts: photobiomodulation as a trend in the management of socket bone preservation—a review. Biology 9(11):409. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9110409
doi: 10.3390/biology9110409
pubmed: 33238412
pmcid: 7700402
Kathuria V, Dhillon JK, Kalra G (2015) Low level laser therapy: a panacea for oral maladies. Laser Ther 24(3):215–223. https://doi.org/10.5978/islsm.15-RA-01
doi: 10.5978/islsm.15-RA-01
pubmed: 26557737
pmcid: 4639680
Legouté F, Bensadoun RJ, Seegers V et al (2019) Low-level laser therapy in treatment of chemoradiotherapy-induced mucositis in head and neck cancer: results of a randomised, triple blind, multicentre phase III trial. Radiat Oncol Lond Engl 14(1):83. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1292-2
doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1292-2
Sayed MA, El-Sherif RM, Ismail A, Abou Warda AE, Mohamed AR, El-Sherif AA (2023) Effect of low-level laser physiotherapy on left ventricular function among patients with chronic systolic heart failure. Egypt Heart J EHJ Off Bull Egypt Soc Cardiol 75(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43044-023-00337-6
doi: 10.1186/s43044-023-00337-6
Allameh F, Javadi A, Dadkhahfar S et al (2021) A systematic review of elective laser therapy during pregnancy. J Lasers Med Sci 12:e50. https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2021.50
doi: 10.34172/jlms.2021.50
pubmed: 34733773
pmcid: 8558736
De Revel T, Doghmi K (2004) Physiologie de l’hémostase. EMC - Dent 1(1):71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emcden.2003.05.001
doi: 10.1016/j.emcden.2003.05.001
Alsaggaf A, Fenlon MR (2020) A case control study to investigate the effects of denture wear on residual alveolar ridge resorption in edentulous patients. J Dent 98:103373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103373
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103373
pubmed: 32389732