Evaluation and management of hepatic dysfunction, portal hypertension and portal/splanchnic vein thrombosis in patients with myelofibrosis undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation: A practice based survey on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT.
Gastroesophageal varices
Hepatic dysfunction
Myelofibrosis
Portal hypertension
Portal thrombosis
Splanchnic vein thrombosis
Transplantation
Journal
Current research in translational medicine
ISSN: 2452-3186
Titre abrégé: Curr Res Transl Med
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101681234
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Oct 2024
25 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
16
02
2024
revised:
08
09
2024
accepted:
16
10
2024
medline:
27
10
2024
pubmed:
27
10
2024
entrez:
26
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Heterogeneous approaches exist in regard to the management of disease-related co-morbidities in potential allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) candidates with myelofibrosis (MF). The EBMT Chronic Malignancies Working Party launched an electronic survey to evaluate how MF-specific comorbidities are approached and whether they ultimately affect the decision to transplant. A total of 41/63 (65%) Centers, all of whom were experienced in the management of MF allo-HCT, responded. Responses were aggregated and reported in a comparative fashion. Screening for portal hypertension (PH) was routinely performed in 54% centers, never in 12% and guided by clinical manifestations in the remaining. Involvement of hepatologists/gastroenterologists was always/very often considered in patients with signs of PH prior to transplant. Centers reported that radiological evidence of PH did not routinely represent a formal contraindication for allo-HCT in most cases (78%). Of note, most centers (61%) did not perform routine screening for gastroesophageal varices; this was systematically considered or guided by clinical manifestations in only 7% and 32% centers, respectively. Presence of gastroesophageal varices was always (15%) or occasionally (19%) considered a formal contraindication to allo-HCT. A prior history of portal vein thrombosis never (78%) or occasionally (15%) represented a formal contraindication. Three Centers would not proceed to transplant in such cases. Less importance was assigned to non-portal splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT), with all but one centre proceeding to transplant regardless of prior SVT. This survey highlights a considerable heterogeneity across responding centers in approaching MF-related comorbidities prior to transplant, suggesting that harmonisation guidelines are needed to address these issues in this patient population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39461096
pii: S2452-3186(24)00038-2
doi: 10.1016/j.retram.2024.103476
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
103476Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.