Factual observations of dynamic bone crushing.
Digital image correlation
Failure
Infrared
Microstructure.
Pig rib
Split-Hopkinson
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Oct 2024
27 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
18
07
2024
accepted:
24
10
2024
medline:
27
10
2024
pubmed:
27
10
2024
entrez:
27
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Dynamic bone-crushing, exemplified by the pig bone rib, is characterized thermo-mechanically in relation to the bone's microstructural characteristics. The cortical bone's dominant role consists of shielding the trabecular component by resisting deformation, sustaining high load levels, and ultimately cracking. Here we present a qualitative factual study to show that this behavior is the absolute opposite of its quasi-static counterpart in which the trabecular bone was found to play the dominant role. Using infrared thermography, we observed for the first time a significant localized temperature rise of up to 11 degrees Celsius in both cortical and trabecular damaging regions. Such observations call for additional clinically oriented research. Such a high contrast between static and dynamic failure mechanisms was not reported previously, and it paves the way for forensic-oriented studies in which the nature of the sustained load must be determined.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39462125
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77717-8
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-77717-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
25597Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Cooper, D. M. L., Kawalilak, C. E., Harrison, K., Johnston, B. D. & Johnston, J. D. Cortical Bone Porosity: What Is It, Why Is It Important, and How Can We Detect It? Current Osteoporosis Reports vol. 14 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-016-0319-y (2016).
Carter, D. R. & Hayes, W. C. The Compressive Behavior of Bone as a Two-Phase Porous Structure (1977).
Carter, D. R. & Hayes, W. C. Bone compressive strength: the influence of density and strain rate. Science 194, 1174–1176 (1976).
doi: 10.1126/science.996549
pubmed: 996549
Cowin, S. H A N D B O O K Bone Mechanics Second Edition.
Keaveny, T. M., Morgan, E. F., Niebur, G. L. & Yeh, O. C. Biomechanics of trabecular bone. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 3, 307–333. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.3.1.307 (2001).
doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.3.1.307
pubmed: 11447066
Shemtov-Yona, K. Quantitative assessment of the jawbone quality classification: a meta-analysis study. PLoS One 16, (2021).
Kieser, J. A., Weller, S., Swain, M. V., Waddell, N., Das, R. & J. & Compressive rib fracture: peri-mortem and post-mortem trauma patterns in a pig model. Leg. Med. 15, 193–201 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2013.01.001
Bradley, A. L. et al. A comparison between rib fracture patterns in peri- and post-mortem compressive injury in a piglet model. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 33, 67–75 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.06.004
pubmed: 23867291
Lee, C. S. et al. A new constitutive model for simulation of softening, plateau, and densification phenomena for trabecular bone under compression. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 65, 213–223 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.08.028
pubmed: 27592290
Belda, R., Palomar, M., Peris-Serra, J. L., Vercher-Martínez, A. & Giner, E. Compression failure characterization of cancellous bone combining experimental testing, digital image correlation and finite element modeling. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 165, (2020).
Wright, T. M. & Hayes, W. C. Tensile testing of bone over a wide range of strain rates: effects of strain rate, microstructure and density. (1976).
Silva-Henao, J. D., Esteban, R., Marañon-Leon, R. J., Casas-Rodríguez, J. P. & A. & Post-yield mechanical properties of bovine trabecular bone – relationships with bone volume fraction and strain rate. Eng. Fract. Mech. 233, 107053 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107053
Guo, X. D. E., McMahon, T. A., Keaveny, T. M., Hayes, W. C. & Gibson, L. J. Finite element modeling of damage accumulation in trabecular bone under cyclic loading. J. Biomech. 27, 145–155 (1994).
doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(94)90203-8
pubmed: 8132682
Bevill, G. & Keaveny, T. M. Trabecular bone strength predictions using finite element analysis of micro-scale images at limited spatial resolution. Bone 44, 579–584 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.11.020
pubmed: 19135184
Hambli, R. Micro-CT finite element model and experimental validation of trabecular bone damage and fracture. Bone 56, 363–374 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.06.028
pubmed: 23850483
Nazarian, A., Stauber, M., Zurakowski, D., Snyder, B. D. & Müller, R. The interaction of microstructure and volume fraction in predicting failure in cancellous bone. Bone 39, 1196–1202 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.06.013
pubmed: 16920051
Nazarian, A., Von Stechow, D., Zurakowski, D., Müller, R. & Snyder, B. D. Bone volume fraction explains the variation in strength and stiffness of cancellous bone affected by metastatic cancer and osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int. 83, 368–379 (2008).
doi: 10.1007/s00223-008-9174-x
pubmed: 18946628
Galante, J., Rostoker, W. & Ray, R. D. Physical properties of trabecular bone. Tiss Res. 5, 236–246 (1970).
doi: 10.1007/BF02017552
Wright, T. M. & Hayes, W. C. Tensile testing of bone over a wide range of strain rates: effects of strain rate, microstructure and density. Med. Biol. Eng. 14, 671–680 (1976).
doi: 10.1007/BF02477046
pubmed: 994579
Prot, M., Cloete, T. J., Saletti, D. & Laporte, S. The behavior of cancellous bone from quasi-static to dynamic strain rates with emphasis on the intermediate regime. J. Biomech. 49, 1050–1057 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.02.021
pubmed: 26970887
Teja, C. K., Chawla, A. & Mukherjee, S. Determining the strain rate dependence of cortical and cancellous bones of human tibia using a Split Hopkinson pressure bar. Int. J. Crashworthiness 18, 11–18 (2013).
doi: 10.1080/13588265.2012.730212
Pithioux, M., Subit, D. & Chabrand, P. Comparison of compact bone failure under two different loading rates: experimental and modelling approaches. Med. Eng. Phys. 26, 647–653 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.05.002
pubmed: 15471692
Enns-Bray, W. S., Ferguson, S. J. & Helgason, B. Strain rate dependency of bovine trabecular bone under impact loading at sideways fall velocity. J. Biomech. 75, 46–52 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.04.042
pubmed: 29773425
Hwa Hong, J. & Hong Song, S. Poroelastic behavior of trabecular bone: the effect of strain rate. KSME Int. J. 12 (1998).
Hansen, U., Zioupos, P., Simpson, R., Currey, J. D. & Hynd, D. The effect of strain rate on the mechanical properties of human cortical bone. J. Biomech. Eng. 130, (2008).
Li, Z. et al. Experimental and numerical study on the mechanical properties of cortical and spongy cranial bone of 8-week-old porcines at different strain rates. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 19, 1797–1808 (2020).
doi: 10.1007/s10237-020-01309-4
pubmed: 32086636
Bekker, A., Cloete, T. J., Chinsamy-Turan, A., Nurick, G. N. & Kok, S. Constant strain rate compression of bovine cortical bone on the Split-Hopkinson pressure bar. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 46, 443–449 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.10.071
Szabó, M. E., Taylor, M. & Thurner, P. J. Mechanical properties of single bovine trabeculae are unaffected by strain rate. J. Biomech. 44, 962–967 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.12.008
pubmed: 21333291
pmcid: 3088861
Pilcher, A. et al. High strain rate testing of bovine trabecular bone. J. Biomech. Eng. 132, (2010).
Adharapurapu, R. R., Jiang, F. & Vecchio, K. S. Dynamic fracture of bovine bone. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 26, 1325–1332 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2005.08.008
Prot, M., Saletti, D., Pattofatto, S., Bousson, V. & Laporte, S. Links between mechanical behavior of cancellous bone and its microstructural properties under dynamic loading. J. Biomech. 48, 498–503 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.12.002
pubmed: 25577437
Hillier, M. L. & Bell, L. S. Differentiating human bone from animal bone: A review of histological methods. Journal of Forensic Sciences vol. 52 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00368.x (2007).
Aerssens, J., Boonen, S., Lowet, G. & Dequeker, J. Interspecies Differences in Bone Composition, Density, and Quality: Potential Implications for in Vivo Bone Research*. Endocrinology vol. 139. https://academic.oup.com/endo/article/139/2/663/2987138 (1998).
Aharoni, S., Rittel, D. & Shemtov-Yona, K. Compressive mechanical behavior and failure of the pig bone rib and correlation to its morphological characteristics. Mech. Mater. 185, (2023).
Dragonfly. http://www.theobjects.com/dragonfly (2020).
Otsu, N. A. Threshold selection method from Gray-Level Histograms. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. CybernS MC-9, 62–66 (1979).
doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076
Bouxsein, M. L. et al. Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro-computed tomography. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research vol. 25 1468–1486 Preprint at (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.141
Chen, W. & Song, B. Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) Bar. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7982-7 (2011).
Hopkinson, B. A method of measuring the pressure produced in the detonation of high explosives or by the impact of bullets. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. Ser. Containing Papers Math. Phys. Character 89, 411–413 (1914).
Kolsky, H. An investigation of the mechanical properties of materials at very high rates of loading. Proc. Phys. Soc. London, Sect. B 62, 676–700 (1949).
doi: 10.1088/0370-1301/62/11/302
Nieto-Fuentes, J. C., Osovski, S. & Rittel, D. High-speed infrared thermal measurements of impacted metallic solids. MethodsX 7, (2020).
LaVision GmbH. DaVis LaVision. Preprint at (2021). https://www.lavision.de/en/products/davis-software/
Dassault Systèmes, A. B. A. Q. U. S. Preprint at (2021). https://www.3ds.com/products/simulia/abaqus (2021).
Lai, Y. S. et al. The effect of graft strength on knee laxity and graft in-situ forces after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. PLoS One 10, (2015).
Rupin, F. et al. Experimental determination of Young modulus and Poisson ratio in cortical bone tissue using high resolution scanning acoustic microscopy and nanoindentation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 3785–3785 (2008).
doi: 10.1121/1.2935440
Charlebois, M. et al. A nonlocal constitutive model for trabecular bone softening in compression. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 9, 597–611 (2010).
doi: 10.1007/s10237-010-0200-3
pubmed: 20238139
Christie, J. Surgical heat injury of bone. Injury 13, 188–190 (1981).
doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(81)90236-9
pubmed: 7327738
Dolan, E. B., Haugh, M. G., Tallon, D., Casey, C. & McNamara, L. M. Heat-shock-induced cellular responses to temperature elevations occurring during orthopaedic cutting. J. R Soc. Interface 9, 3503–3513 (2012).
doi: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0520
pubmed: 22915633
pmcid: 3481591