Identification of peripheral nerve functional fascicles in Sprague-Dawley rats by the carbon quantum dot-Annexin V antibody complex.
Annexin-V
Carbon quantum dot
Functional fascicles
Identify
Peripheral nerves
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Oct 2024
28 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
11
06
2024
accepted:
21
10
2024
medline:
28
10
2024
pubmed:
28
10
2024
entrez:
28
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To explore a method to identify the sensory and motor fascicles of the peripheral nerve to achieve accurate peripheral nerve functional fascicle suture. The peripheral nerve Sunderland V injury model, muscle branch of the femoral nerve and saphenous nerve were established in the bilateral femoral nerves of Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. The specific samples were grouped as follows: the main trunk of the femoral nerve was exposed bilaterally and cut with microscopic scissors in the main trunk of the femoral nerve to prepare a model of Sunderland V injury in the mixed fascicle of peripheral nerves; the muscle branch of the femoral nerve was exposed bilaterally and cut in the middle section of the muscle branch of the femoral nerve to prepare a model of Sunderland V injury in the motor fascicle of peripheral nerves; the saphenous nerve was exposed bilaterally and cut at 1 cm below the patella to prepare a model of Sunderland V injury to the sensory fascicle of the peripheral nerves. A carbon quantum dot (CD)-annexin V antibody complex was prepared and applied to the distal and proximal nerve stumps of the peripheral nerve Sunderland V injury model groups of SD rats. Under the excitation light source of a 380 nm uv lamp, fluorescence color development was observed under a fluorescence microscope after 5, 10, 15, and 20 min. At 5 min, sections of the bilateral femoral nerve trunk, muscular branches of the femoral nerve, and Sunderland V lesion of the saphenous nerve in SD rats were only dark in color under the microscope, and there was no difference in fluorescence. The intensity of the staining increased significantly for 10-20 min. The sensory fascicles and saphenous nerves of the femoral nerve trunk showed blue fluorescence under the CD-Annexin V antibody complex staining, while the motor fascicles and muscle branches of the femoral nerve trunk showed no fluorescence. Fluorescence intensity gradually decreased after 20 min of staining. There was no significant difference in the staining intensity at 5, 10, 15, and 20 min in each group. Our results suggest that the CD-Annexin antibody complex can be used to identify functional fascicles of peripheral nerves in SD rats.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39463438
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77276-y
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-77276-y
doi:
Substances chimiques
Annexin A5
0
Carbon
7440-44-0
Antibodies
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
25691Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
1. Wei D, Zhao L, Hua XY, Zheng MX, Wu JJ, Xu JG. A bibliometric analysis of brachial plexus injury from 1980 to 2022.Heliyon. 2024;10:e26175.
2. Seddon HJ, Medawar PB, Smith H, Rate of regeneration of peripheral nerves in man. J Physiol 1943;102:191–215.
3. Sunderland S, A classification of peripheral nerve injuries producing loss of function. Brain 1951;74:491–516.
4. Hu R, Dun X, Singh L, Banton MC. Runx2 regulates peripheral nerve regeneration to promote Schwann cell migration and re-myelination. Neural Regen Res. 2024;19:1575–1583.
5. Rotterman TM, García VV, Housley SN, Nardelli P, Sierra R, Fix CE, et al. Structural Preservation Does Not Ensure Function at Sensory Ia-Motoneuron Synapses following Peripheral Nerve Injury and Repair. J Neurosci. 2023;43:4390–4404.
6. Xianyu M, Zhenggang B, Laijin L. Identification of the sensory and motor fascicles in the peripheral nerve: A historical review and recent progress. Neurol. India 2016;64:880–885.
7. Zhou X, Du J, Qing L, Mee T, Xu X, Wang Z, et al. Identification of sensory and motor nerve fascicles by immunofluorescence staining after peripheral nerve injury. Journal of Translational Medicine.2021;19: 207.
8. He Q, Yu F, Cong M, Ji Y, Zhang Q, Ding F. Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Differentially Expressed Proteins between Injured Sensory and Motor Nerves after Peripheral Nerve Transection. Journal of Proteome Research.2021;20: 1488–1508.
9. Xianyu M, Zhenggang B, Jian S, Laijin L. Differential Protein Expression between the Motor and Sensory Fascicles in Rat Femoral Nerve Injury. Neurol India. 2024;72:90–95.
10. Meng X,Lu L,Wang H,Liu B. Differentiation between the motor and sensory fascicles of the peripheral nerves from adult rats using annexin V-CdTe-conjugated polymer. Neurol. India 2011;59:333–338.
11. Wariyar SS, Ward PJ. Application of Electrical Stimulation to Enhance Axon Regeneration Following Peripheral Nerve Injury. Bio Protoc. 2023;13:e4833.
12. Cheburkanov V, Du J, Brogan DM, Berezin MY, Yakovlev VV. Toward peripheral nerve mechanical characterization using Brillouin imaging spectroscopy. Neurophotonics. 2023;10:035007.
13. Xie JX, Pu XP, Bao JF, Li YZ, Chen YH, Li CL. Purification and identification of a 35 kD specific protein (SSP-35) of rat spinal sensory ganglia. Chin J Biochem Mol Biol. 2001;17:306–310.
14. Shen JY, Yu QS, Wang Q, Li Q, Pu XP. Secondary structure and neurotrophic effect of a 33.1 kDa specific protein (SSP-33.1) in spinal sensory ganglia. J Chin Pharm Sci. 2003;12:106–111.
15. Wang H, Ma F, Wang F, Liu D, Li X, Du S. Identification of motor and sensory fascicles in peripheral nerve trunk using immunohistochemistry and micro-Raman spectroscopy. J Trauma. 2011;71:1246–1251.
16. Cordeiro MF, Hill D, Patel R, Corazza P, Maddison J, Younis S. Detecting retinal cell stress and apoptosis with DARC: Progression from lab to clinic. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2022;86:100976.
17. Wu JY, Huang YC. Low-energy-consumption rapid synthesis of carbon dots at room temperature from combusted food waste with versatile analytical applications. Food Chem. 2024; 446:138908.