Short arm splints for wrist stabilization: A mechanical material test and cadaveric radiography study.
cadaveric setup
fracture stabilization
short arm splint
three‐point bending test
wrist immobilization
Journal
Journal of experimental orthopaedics
ISSN: 2197-1153
Titre abrégé: J Exp Orthop
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101653750
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2024
Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
05
06
2024
revised:
16
09
2024
accepted:
21
09
2024
medline:
28
10
2024
pubmed:
28
10
2024
entrez:
28
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Documentation of the wrist stabilizing effect and mechanical properties of common splinting materials is warranted to support evidence-based condition-specific recommendations for wrist immobilization. The objectives of this study were to assess the wrist stabilizing properties of volar and dorsal short-arm splints made of four different materials and evaluate the mechanical properties of the splinting materials. Dorsal and volar short arm splints made of plaster of Paris (PoP) (eight layers), Woodcast (2 mm, rigid vented), X-lite (classic, two layers) or a 3D-printed material (polypropylene) were sequentially mounted on 10 cadaveric arm specimens and fixed in a radiolucent fixture. This enabled the evaluation of maximum wrist flexion and extension relative under an orthogonal load of 42 N via radiographic images. In addition, a three-point bending test was performed on ten sheet duplicates of each of the four splinting materials. When applied as a volar splint, PoP had the highest capability to resist wrist flexion and extension. However, when applied as a dorsal splint, Woodcast exhibited a lower wrist flexion and a similar wrist extension. The 3D-printed splints-both volar and dorsal-showed the highest mean wrist flexion and extension. The mechanical properties of the Woodcast, X-lite and 3D-printed splinting materials were very similar. PoP exhibited distinct properties with a stiffness of 146 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 120-173) N/mm and a deflection at PoP displayed better wrist stabilizing properties and material stiffness than Woodcast, X-lite and 3D-printed polypropylene. When considering wrist stabilizing properties, PoP may still prove to be the preferred choice for wrist immobilization. Not applicable.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39463466
doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70065
pii: JEO270065
pmc: PMC11512441
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e70065Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.