Comparison of Two Methods of Antepartum Anticoagulation: Continuation of Enoxaparin until Scheduled Induction of Labor Versus Transitioning to Heparin with Spontaneous Labor.
anesthesia
anticoagulation
labor
Journal
Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)
ISSN: 2688-4844
Titre abrégé: Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101768931
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
accepted:
10
07
2024
pmc-release:
26
09
2025
medline:
28
10
2024
pubmed:
28
10
2024
entrez:
28
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pregnancy is a hypercoagulable state. There is a lack of strong evidence-based guidance regarding management when anticoagulation is required to prevent or treat venous thromboembolism during pregnancy. In practice, some patients are prescribed enoxaparin and transitioned to heparin due to the shorter half-life in the setting of an unpredictable delivery despite less predictable pharmacokinetics of heparin compared with enoxaparin, while others are continued on enoxaparin with a scheduled delivery. This work retrospectively evaluates obstetrical and neonatal outcomes between these two practices for 194 live singleton deliveries from 179 patients in a single institution January 2017 through May 2022. A Bayesian regression was used to control for confounders including dosing regimens. This work found no statistically significant differences in blood loss at time of delivery or availability of neuraxial anesthesia. This suggests continuing enoxaparin is noninferior to transitioning to heparin when anticoagulation is indicated in pregnancy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39463471
doi: 10.1089/whr.2024.0039
pii: 10.1089/whr.2024.0039
pmc: PMC11512085
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
720-726Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.