How does Public Financial Management (PFM) influence health system efficiency: A scoping review.

Public Financial Management efficiency health systems

Journal

Wellcome open research
ISSN: 2398-502X
Titre abrégé: Wellcome Open Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101696457

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
accepted: 26 07 2024
medline: 28 10 2024
pubmed: 28 10 2024
entrez: 28 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Effective Public Financial Management (PFM) approaches are imperative in the quest for efficiency in health service delivery. Reviews conducted in this area have assessed the impact of PFM approaches on health system efficiency but have left out the mechanisms through which PFM influences efficiency. This scoping review aims to synthesize evidence on the mechanisms by which PFM influences health system efficiency. We searched databases of PubMed and Google Scholar and websites of the World Health Organization (WHO), World Bank and Overseas Development Institute (ODI) for peer-reviewed and grey literature articles that provided data on the relationship between PFM and health system efficiency. Three reviewers screened the articles for eligibility with the inclusion criteria. Data on PFM and health system efficiency was charted and summarized. We then reported the mechanisms by which PFM influence efficiency. PFM processes and structures influence health system efficiency by influencing; the alignment of resources to health system needs, the cost of inputs, the motivation of health workers, and the input mix. The entire budget process influences health system efficiency. However, most of the findings are drawn from studies that focused on aspects of the budget process. Studies that look at PFM in totality will help explore other cross-cutting issues within sections of the budget cycle; they will also bring out the relationship between the different phases of the budget cycle. Effective management of public finances is crucial for health services, but previous reviews have not fully explained how this happens. This review aims to uncover the ways in which public financial management influences health system performance. By searching medical and financial databases, as well as major organizations' websites, we identified relevant studies and reports that explain this relationship. Our analysis found that PFM processes influence the entire health budget process, from planning to spending, and monitoring, all of which play a significant role in health system performance. However, most studies have focused on specific parts of the budget process. Future research should explore the entire budget cycle to understand how its different stages are interconnected and affect health system performance.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Effective Public Financial Management (PFM) approaches are imperative in the quest for efficiency in health service delivery. Reviews conducted in this area have assessed the impact of PFM approaches on health system efficiency but have left out the mechanisms through which PFM influences efficiency. This scoping review aims to synthesize evidence on the mechanisms by which PFM influences health system efficiency.
Methods UNASSIGNED
We searched databases of PubMed and Google Scholar and websites of the World Health Organization (WHO), World Bank and Overseas Development Institute (ODI) for peer-reviewed and grey literature articles that provided data on the relationship between PFM and health system efficiency. Three reviewers screened the articles for eligibility with the inclusion criteria. Data on PFM and health system efficiency was charted and summarized. We then reported the mechanisms by which PFM influence efficiency.
Results UNASSIGNED
PFM processes and structures influence health system efficiency by influencing; the alignment of resources to health system needs, the cost of inputs, the motivation of health workers, and the input mix.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
The entire budget process influences health system efficiency. However, most of the findings are drawn from studies that focused on aspects of the budget process. Studies that look at PFM in totality will help explore other cross-cutting issues within sections of the budget cycle; they will also bring out the relationship between the different phases of the budget cycle.
Effective management of public finances is crucial for health services, but previous reviews have not fully explained how this happens. This review aims to uncover the ways in which public financial management influences health system performance. By searching medical and financial databases, as well as major organizations' websites, we identified relevant studies and reports that explain this relationship. Our analysis found that PFM processes influence the entire health budget process, from planning to spending, and monitoring, all of which play a significant role in health system performance. However, most studies have focused on specific parts of the budget process. Future research should explore the entire budget cycle to understand how its different stages are interconnected and affect health system performance.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
Effective management of public finances is crucial for health services, but previous reviews have not fully explained how this happens. This review aims to uncover the ways in which public financial management influences health system performance. By searching medical and financial databases, as well as major organizations' websites, we identified relevant studies and reports that explain this relationship. Our analysis found that PFM processes influence the entire health budget process, from planning to spending, and monitoring, all of which play a significant role in health system performance. However, most studies have focused on specific parts of the budget process. Future research should explore the entire budget cycle to understand how its different stages are interconnected and affect health system performance.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39464374
doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.22533.1
pmc: PMC11502999
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

566

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Musiega A et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

No competing interests were disclosed.

Auteurs

Anita Musiega (A)

Health Economics Research Unit, KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.
Institute of Healthcare Management, Strathmore University Business School, Strathmore University, Nairobi, Nairobi County, Kenya.

Benjamin Tsofa (B)

Health Systems and Research Ethics Department, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.

Edwine Barasa (E)

Health Economics Research Unit, KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.
Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Classifications MeSH