Use and perceptions of involuntary civil commitment among post-overdose outreach staff in Massachusetts, United States: A mixed-methods study.
drug policy
involuntary civil commitment
mixed‐methods
opioids
overdose
policing
qualitative research
Journal
Addiction (Abingdon, England)
ISSN: 1360-0443
Titre abrégé: Addiction
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9304118
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Oct 2024
28 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
18
12
2023
accepted:
19
09
2024
medline:
29
10
2024
pubmed:
29
10
2024
entrez:
28
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Involuntary civil commitment (ICC) is a legal process by which people are compulsorily admitted to substance use treatment. This study explored views about and promotion of ICC procedures for substance use disorders among public health-public safety post-overdose outreach programs and their outreach team members in Massachusetts, USA. In this mixed-methods study, survey data were collected from post-overdose outreach programs in 2019, and semi-structured interviews were conducted with outreach team members in 2019 and 2020. Massachusetts, USA. We received 138 survey responses and conducted 38 interviews with post-overdose outreach team members (law enforcement officers, recovery coaches, social workers and harm reductionists) who were majority male (57%) and white (66%). We used the survey instrument to categorize programs as more (discussed ICC at 50% or more of outreach encounters) or less ICC focused (discussed ICC at less than 50% of outreach encounters) and to identify program characteristics that corresponded with each categorization. Semi-structured interviews explored staff perceptions of ICC effectiveness. Among 138 programs, 36% (n = 50) discussed ICC at 50% or more of outreach encounters. Discussing ICC at a majority of visits was positively associated with abstinence-only program philosophies (36% v. 6%, P < 0.001) and collaborating with drug courts (60% v. 30%, P < 0.001), but negatively associated with naloxone distribution (48% v. 75%, P < 0.001) and referring to syringe service programs (26% v. 65%, P < 0.001). Qualitative interviews identified three themes: 1) some programs viewed ICC as a first line tool to engage overdose survivors in treatment; 2) other programs considered ICC a last resort, skeptical of its benefits and concerned about potential harms; 3) families commonly initiated discussions about ICC, reportedly out of desperation. Promotion of involuntary civil commitment (ICC) appears to vary widely across post-overdose outreach programs in Massachusetts, USA, with approaches ranging from seeing it as a first step to treatment to being a tool of last resort. Demand for ICC among family members may relate to inadequate access to voluntary treatment. Family interest in ICC appears to be driven by inadequate availability of treatment and other services. ICC at post-overdose outreach visits should be limited, if used at all.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
OBJECTIVE
Involuntary civil commitment (ICC) is a legal process by which people are compulsorily admitted to substance use treatment. This study explored views about and promotion of ICC procedures for substance use disorders among public health-public safety post-overdose outreach programs and their outreach team members in Massachusetts, USA.
DESIGN
METHODS
In this mixed-methods study, survey data were collected from post-overdose outreach programs in 2019, and semi-structured interviews were conducted with outreach team members in 2019 and 2020.
SETTING
METHODS
Massachusetts, USA.
PARTICIPANTS
METHODS
We received 138 survey responses and conducted 38 interviews with post-overdose outreach team members (law enforcement officers, recovery coaches, social workers and harm reductionists) who were majority male (57%) and white (66%).
MEASUREMENTS
METHODS
We used the survey instrument to categorize programs as more (discussed ICC at 50% or more of outreach encounters) or less ICC focused (discussed ICC at less than 50% of outreach encounters) and to identify program characteristics that corresponded with each categorization. Semi-structured interviews explored staff perceptions of ICC effectiveness.
FINDINGS
RESULTS
Among 138 programs, 36% (n = 50) discussed ICC at 50% or more of outreach encounters. Discussing ICC at a majority of visits was positively associated with abstinence-only program philosophies (36% v. 6%, P < 0.001) and collaborating with drug courts (60% v. 30%, P < 0.001), but negatively associated with naloxone distribution (48% v. 75%, P < 0.001) and referring to syringe service programs (26% v. 65%, P < 0.001). Qualitative interviews identified three themes: 1) some programs viewed ICC as a first line tool to engage overdose survivors in treatment; 2) other programs considered ICC a last resort, skeptical of its benefits and concerned about potential harms; 3) families commonly initiated discussions about ICC, reportedly out of desperation.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Promotion of involuntary civil commitment (ICC) appears to vary widely across post-overdose outreach programs in Massachusetts, USA, with approaches ranging from seeing it as a first step to treatment to being a tool of last resort. Demand for ICC among family members may relate to inadequate access to voluntary treatment. Family interest in ICC appears to be driven by inadequate availability of treatment and other services. ICC at post-overdose outreach visits should be limited, if used at all.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : CDC HHS
ID : R01CE003052
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2024 Society for the Study of Addiction.
Références
O'Donnell J. Trends in and characteristics of drug overdose deaths involving illicitly manufactured Fentanyls — United States, 2019–2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70: 1740–1746. PMID: Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7050e3.htm
Spencer MR, Miniño AM, Warner M. Drug overdose deaths in the United States, 2001–2021 [internet]; 2022 Report No.: 457. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db457.htm
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. FastStats ‐ injuries [internet]; 2024 Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/injury.htm
Massachusetts Department of Public Health. Data brief: opioid‐related overdose deaths among Massachusetts residents [internet]; 2023 Available from: https://www.mass.gov/doc/opioid-related-overdose-deaths-among-ma-residents-december-2023
Formica SW, Apsler R, Wilkins L, Ruiz S, Reilly B, Walley AY. Post opioid overdose outreach by public health and public safety agencies: exploration of emerging programs in Massachusetts. Int J Drug Policy. 2018;54:43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.01.001
Bagley SM, Hadland SE, Levy S, Schoenberger SF, Roy T, Yule AM. Opioid use among Adolescents & Young Adults: toolkit for Pediatric & Primary Care Providers [internet]; 2019 Available from: https://files.hria.org/files/SA5829.pdf
Formica SW, Waye KM, Benintendi AO, Yan S, Bagley SM, Beletsky L, et al. Characteristics of post‐overdose public health‐public safety outreach in Massachusetts. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021;219:108499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108499
Bailey A, Harrington C, Evans EA. A scoping review of community‐based post‐opioid overdose intervention programs: implications of program structure and outcomes. Health Justice. 2023;11(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-022-00201-w
The General Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. General law ‐ part I, title XVII, chapter 123, section 35 [internet]; 2024 Available from: https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleXVII/Chapter123/Section35
Christopher PP, Appelbaum PS, Stein MD. Criminalization of opioid civil commitment. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020;77(2):111–112. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2845
Kang S, McCreedy K, Messinger J, Bhargava R, Beletsky L. The other infodemic: media misinformation about involuntary commitment for substance use. J Addict Med. 2023;17(6):e396–e398. https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001194
Ledberg A, Reitan T. Increased risk of death immediately after discharge from compulsory care for substance abuse. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022;236:109492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109492
Vo AT, Magana C, Hickman M, Borquez A, Beletsky L, Martin NK, et al. Assessing HIV and overdose risks for people who use drugs exposed to compulsory drug abstinence programs (CDAP): a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Int J Drug Policy. 2021;96:103401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103401
Lunze K, Idrisov B, Golichenko M, Kamarulzaman A. Mandatory addiction treatment for people who use drugs: global health and human rights analysis. BMJ. 2016;353:i2943. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i2943
Pilarinos A, Barker B, Nosova E, Milloy MJ, Hayashi K, Wood E, et al. Coercion into addiction treatment and subsequent substance use patterns among people who use illicit drugs in Vancouver. Canada Addict Abingdon Engl. 2020;115(1):97–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14769
Werb D, Kamarulzaman A, Meacham MC, Rafful C, Fischer B, Strathdee SA, et al. The effectiveness of compulsory drug treatment: a systematic review. Int J Drug Policy. 2016;28:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.12.005
Christopher PP, Anderson B, Stein MD. Civil commitment experiences among opioid users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;193:137–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.10.001
Parker CM, Miranda‐Miller OE, Albizu‐García C. Involuntary civil commitment for substance use disorders in Puerto Rico: neglected rights violations and implications for legal reform. Health Hum Rights. 2022;24(2):59–70.
Wahbi R, Beletsky L. Involuntary commitment as “carceral‐health service”: from healthcare‐to‐prison pipeline to a public health abolition praxis. J Law Med Ethics J Am Soc Law Med Ethics. 2022;50(1):23–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2022.5
Sinha MS, Messinger JC, Beletsky L. Neither ethical nor effective: the false promise of involuntary commitment to address the overdose crisis. J Law Med Ethics J Am Soc Law Med Ethics. 2020;48(4):741–743. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110520979384
Udwadia FR, Illes J. An Ethicolegal analysis of involuntary treatment for opioid use disorders. J Law Med Ethics J Am Soc Law Med Ethics. 2020;48(4):735–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110520979383
Evans EA, Harrington C, Roose R, Lemere S, Buchanan D. Perceived benefits and harms of involuntary civil commitment for opioid use disorder. J Law Med Ethics J Am Soc Law Med Ethics. 2020;48(4):718–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110520979382
Best practice guidance for post overdose outreach [internet] Boston, MA: Grayken Center for Addiction, Boston Medical Center; 2023 Available from: www.prontopostoverdose.org
Fetters MD, Curry LA, Creswell JW. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs‐principles and practices. Health Serv Res. 2013;48(6 Pt 2):2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
Glaser BG. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis*. Soc Probl. 1965;12(4):436–445. https://doi.org/10.2307/798843
Valverde M. Diseases of the will: alcohol and the dilemmas of freedom Cambridge University Press; 1998.
Massachusetts Bureau of Substance Addiction Services. Section 35: the process|Mass.gov [internet]; 2024 Available from: https://www.mass.gov/info-details/section-35-the-process
Slocum S, Paquette CE, Walley AY, Pollini RA. Civil commitment perspectives and experiences among friends and family of people who use illicit opioids in Massachusetts, USA. Int J Drug Policy. 2023;117:104074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104074
Rafful C, Orozco R, Rangel G, Davidson P, Werb D, Beletsky L, et al. Increased non‐fatal overdose risk associated with involuntary drug treatment in a longitudinal study with people who inject drugs. Addiction. 2018;113(6):1056–1063. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14159
Wild TC. Social control and coercion in addiction treatment: towards evidence‐based policy and practice. Addiction. 2006;101(1):40–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01268.x
Section 35: saving the lives of addicts that don't want to be saved – Boston 25 news [internet]; 2024 Available from: https://www.boston25news.com/news/section-35-saving-the-lives-of-addicts-that-dont-want-to-be-saved/496578709/
Mass BD. Lawmakers to wade into fierce debate over court‐mandated mental health care [internet] WBUR; 2023 Available from: https://www.wbur.org/news/2023/03/13/massachusetts-courts-assisted-outpatient-forced-treatment
Addiction Policy Forum. The myth of waiting for rock bottom [internet]. In: Addiction foreign policy; 2020 Available from: https://www.addictionpolicy.org/post/myth-of-waiting-for-rock-bottom
Shinebourne P, Smith JA. The communicative power of metaphors: an analysis and interpretation of metaphors in accounts of the experience of addiction. Psychol Psychother. 2010;83(Pt 1):59–73. https://doi.org/10.1348/147608309X468077
Wakeman SE, Larochelle MR, Ameli O, Chaisson CE, McPheeters JT, Crown WH, et al. Comparative effectiveness of different treatment pathways for opioid use disorder. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(2):e1920622. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20622
Larochelle MR, Bernson D, Land T, Stopka TJ, Wang N, Xuan Z, et al. Medication for opioid use disorder after nonfatal opioid overdose and association with mortality: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(3):137–145. https://doi.org/10.7326/M17-3107