Systematic review and meta-analysis of antigen rapid diagnostic tests to detect Zaire ebolavirus.
Antigen
Diagnostic accuracy
Diagnostic performance
EVD
Ebola
RDT
Journal
Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease
ISSN: 1879-0070
Titre abrégé: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8305899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Oct 2024
20 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
02
07
2024
revised:
30
09
2024
accepted:
17
10
2024
medline:
29
10
2024
pubmed:
29
10
2024
entrez:
28
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies and reports comparing the performance of antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag RDT) for diagnosing Ebola disease (EVD). We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science for diagnostic studies published between 1976 and 2023, evaluating them with QUADAS-2. Using a bivariate random-effects model, we estimated the pooled sensitivity and specificity of Ag RDTs. Of 64 eligible full studies and reports, 16 met the inclusion criteria. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 82.1% (95%CI: 75.2 - 88.0) and 97.0% (95%CI: 95.1-98.2), respectively. We conducted subgroup analysis on 4 Ag RDTs, 3 RT-PCR tests, and 4 sample types, showing varied performance. The high specificity and positive predictive value of Ag RDTs support their use to "rule-in" patients with EVD. However, high-sensitivity RDTs suitable for field settings and capable of detecting multiple ebolavirus species are needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39467415
pii: S0732-8893(24)00393-6
doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116568
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
116568Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest That there is no conflict of interest for this paper