Cationized extracellular vesicles for gene delivery.
Cancer
EVs
Gene delivery
Multivalent cationic lipid
Transfection
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 10 2024
28 10 2024
Historique:
received:
03
05
2024
accepted:
09
10
2024
medline:
29
10
2024
pubmed:
29
10
2024
entrez:
29
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Last decade, extracellular vesicles (EVs) attracted a lot of attention as potent versatile drug delivery vehicles. We reported earlier the development of EV-based delivery systems for therapeutic proteins and small molecule chemotherapeutics. In this work, we first time engineered EVs with multivalent cationic lipids for the delivery of nucleic acids. Stable, small size cationized EVs were loaded with plasmid DNA (pDNA), or mRNA, or siRNA. Nucleic acid loaded EVs were efficiently taken up by target cells as demonstrated by confocal microscopy and delivered their cargo to the nuclei in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells and macrophages. Efficient transfection was achieved by engineered cationized EVs formulations of pDNA- and mRNA in vitro. Furthermore, siRNA loaded into cationized EVs showed significant knockdown of the reporter gene in Luc-expressing cells. Overall, multivalent cationized EVs represent a promising strategy for gene delivery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39468145
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75985-y
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-75985-y
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cations
0
RNA, Small Interfering
0
RNA, Messenger
0
DNA
9007-49-2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
25818Subventions
Organisme : Russian Science Foundation
ID : 22-13-00261
Organisme : State Registration Theme
ID : 121041500039-8; 123032300028-0
Organisme : State Registration Theme
ID : 121041500039-8; 123032300028-0
Organisme : State Registration Theme
ID : 121041500039-8; 123032300028-0
Organisme : Eshelman Institute for Innovation grant
ID : UNC EII 29202
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Saraiva, C. et al. Nanoparticle-mediated brain drug delivery: overcoming blood–brain barrier to treat neurodegenerative diseases. J. Control Release. 235, 34–47 (2016).
pubmed: 27208862
doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.05.044
Zhang, Q. et al. Stimuli-responsive gene delivery nanocarriers for cancer therapy. Nano-Micro Lett. 15, 44 (2023).
doi: 10.1007/s40820-023-01018-4
Movahedi, F., Hu, R. G., Becker, D. L. & Xu, C. Stimuli-responsive liposomes for the delivery of nucleic acid therapeutics. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 11, 1575–1584 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2015.03.006
Dirisala, A. et al. Effective mRNA protection by poly (l-ornithine) synergizes with endosomal escape functionality of a charge‐conversion polymer toward maximizing mRNA introduction efficiency. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 43, 2100754 (2022).
doi: 10.1002/marc.202100754
Lopukhov, A. V. et al. Mannosylated cationic copolymers for gene delivery to macrophages. Macromol. Biosci. 21, 2000371 (2021).
doi: 10.1002/mabi.202000371
Yang, J., Luly, K. M. & Green, J. J. Nonviral nanoparticle gene delivery into the CNS for neurological disorders and brain cancer applications. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 15, e1853 (2023).
Peng, Q. et al. Preformed albumin corona, a protective coating for nanoparticles based drug delivery system. Biomaterials 34, 8521–8530 (2013).
pubmed: 23932500
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.102
Mun, E. A. & Zhaisanbayeva, B. A. The role of nanoparticle PEGylation in drug delivery. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2, 10–18 (2020).
Yoshida, K., Burton, G. F., McKinney, J. S., Young, H. & Ellis, E. F. Brain and tissue distribution of polyethylene glycol-conjugated superoxide dismutase in rats. Stroke 23, 865–869 (1992).
pubmed: 1595107
doi: 10.1161/01.STR.23.6.865
Veronese, F. M., Caliceti, P., Schiavon, O. & Sergi, M. Polyethylene glycol–superoxide dismutase, a conjugate in search of exploitation. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 54, 587–606 (2002).
doi: 10.1016/S0169-409X(02)00029-7
Ibrahim, M. et al. Polyethylene glycol (PEG): the nature, immunogenicity, and role in the hypersensitivity of PEGylated products. J. Control. Release 351, 215–230 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.09.031
Dams, E. T. et al. Accelerated blood clearance and altered biodistribution of repeated injections of sterically stabilized liposomes. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 292, 1071–1079 (2000).
pubmed: 10688625
Ishida, T. et al. Accelerated clearance of a second injection of PEGylated liposomes in mice. Int. J. Pharm. 255, 167–174 (2003).
pubmed: 12672612
doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(03)00085-1
Ishida, T., Kashima, S. & Kiwada, H. The contribution of phagocytic activity of liver macrophages to the accelerated blood clearance (ABC) phenomenon of PEGylated liposomes in rats. J. Controll. Release 126, 162–165 (2008).
doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.11.009
Hoang Thi, T. T., Pilkington, E. H., Nguyen, D. H., Lee, J. S. & Park, K. D. Truong, N. P. The importance of poly (ethylene glycol) alternatives for overcoming PEG immunogenicity in drug delivery and bioconjugation. Polymers 12, 298 (2020).
pubmed: 32024289
pmcid: 7077443
doi: 10.3390/polym12020298
Farhat, S. C. et al. Air pollution in autoimmune rheumatic diseases: a review. Autoimmun. Rev. 11, 14–21 (2011).
pubmed: 21763467
doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2011.06.008
Mohamed, B. M. et al. Citrullination of proteins: a common post-translational modification pathway induced by different nanoparticles in vitro and in vivo. Nanomedicine 7, 1181–1195 (2012).
pubmed: 22625207
doi: 10.2217/nnm.11.177
Belhadj, Z., Qie, Y., Carney, R., Li, Y. & Nie, G. Current advances in non-viral gene delivery systems: liposomes versus extracellular vesicles. BMEMat 1, e12018 (2023).
doi: 10.1002/bmm2.12018
Théry, C., Amigorena, S., Raposo, G. & Clayton, A. Isolation and characterization of exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological fluids. Curr. Protoc. Cell. Biol. 30, 3–22 (2006).
doi: 10.1002/0471143030.cb0322s30
Théry, C., Ostrowski, M. & Segura, E. Membrane vesicles as conveyors of immune responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9, 581–593 (2009).
pubmed: 19498381
doi: 10.1038/nri2567
van den Boorn, J. G., Daßler, J., Coch, C., Schlee, M. & Hartmann, G. Exosomes as nucleic acid nanocarriers. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 65, 331–335 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.06.011
Van Dongen, H. M., Masoumi, N., Witwer, K. W. & Pegtel, D. M. Extracellular vesicles exploit viral entry routes for cargo delivery. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 80, 369–386 (2016).
pubmed: 26935137
pmcid: 4867369
doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00063-15
Clayton, A., Harris, C. L., Court, J., Mason, M. D. & Morgan, B. P. Antigen-presenting cell exosomes are protected from complement‐mediated lysis by expression of CD55 and CD59. Eur. J. Immunol. 33, 522–531 (2003).
pubmed: 12645951
doi: 10.1002/immu.200310028
Kamerkar, S. et al. Exosomes facilitate therapeutic targeting of oncogenic KRAS in pancreatic cancer. Nature 546, 498–503 (2017).
pubmed: 28607485
pmcid: 5538883
doi: 10.1038/nature22341
Mathieu, M., Martin-Jaular, L., Lavieu, G. & Théry, C. Specificities of secretion and uptake of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles for cell-to-cell communication. Nat. Cell. Biol. 21, 9–17 (2019).
pubmed: 30602770
doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0250-9
Reshke, R. et al. Reduction of the therapeutic dose of silencing RNA by packaging it in extracellular vesicles via a pre-microRNA backbone. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4, 52–68 (2020).
pubmed: 31937944
doi: 10.1038/s41551-019-0502-4
Wang, T. et al. Exosome-based drug delivery systems in cancer therapy. Chin. Chem. Lett. 34, 107508 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.05.022
Zeng, W., Wen, Z., Chen, H. & Duan, Y. Exosomes as carriers for drug delivery in cancer therapy. Pharm. Res. 40, 873–887 (2023).
pubmed: 35352281
doi: 10.1007/s11095-022-03224-y
Wolff, A. C. et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 138, 241–256 (2014).
pubmed: 24099077
doi: 10.5858/arpa.2013-0953-SA
Dent, R. et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin. Cancer Res. 13, 4429–4434 (2007).
pubmed: 17671126
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-3045
Yu, T. & Di, G. Role of tumor microenvironment in triple-negative breast cancer and its prognostic significance. Chin. J. Cancer Res. 29, 237 (2017).
pubmed: 28729775
pmcid: 5497211
doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2017.03.10
Kim, M. S. et al. Development of exosome-encapsulated paclitaxel to overcome MDR in cancer cells. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 12, 655–664 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2015.10.012
Haney, M. J. et al. Blood-borne macrophage–neural cell interactions hitchhike on endosome networks for cell-based nanozyme brain delivery. Nanomedicine 7, 815–833 (2012).
pubmed: 22236307
doi: 10.2217/nnm.11.156
Haney, M. J. et al. Exosomes as drug delivery vehicles for Parkinson’s disease therapy. J. Control. Release 207, 18–30 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.03.033
Batrakova, E. V. & Kim, M. S. Using exosomes, naturally-equipped nanocarriers, for drug delivery. J. Control. Release 219, 396–405 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.07.030
Yuan, D. et al. Macrophage exosomes as natural nanocarriers for protein delivery to inflamed brain. Biomaterials 142, 1–12 (2017).
pubmed: 28715655
pmcid: 5603188
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.07.011
Kim, M. S. et al. Engineering macrophage-derived exosomes for targeted paclitaxel delivery to pulmonary metastases: in vitro and in vivo evaluations. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 14, 195–204 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2017.09.011
Klyachko, N. L., Arzt, C. J., Li, S. M., Gololobova, O. A. & Batrakova, E. V. Extracellular vesicle-based therapeutics: preclinical and clinical investigations. Pharmaceutics 12, 1171 (2020).
pubmed: 33271883
pmcid: 7760239
doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12121171
Zhao, Y. et al. Using extracellular vesicles released by GDNF-Transfected macrophages for therapy of Parkinson disease. Cells 11, 1933 (2022).
pubmed: 35741061
pmcid: 9222008
doi: 10.3390/cells11121933
Kim, S. K., Foote, M. B. & Huang, L. The targeted intracellular delivery of cytochrome C protein to tumors using lipid-apolipoprotein nanoparticles. Biomaterials 33, 3959–3966 (2012).
pubmed: 22365810
pmcid: 3307951
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.010
Banks, W. A., Niehoff, M. L., Ponzio, N. M., Erickson, M. A. & Zalcman, S. S. Pharmacokinetics and modeling of immune cell trafficking: quantifying differential influences of target tissues versus lymphocytes in SJL and lipopolysaccharide-treated mice. J. Neuroinflammation. 9, 1–14 (2012).
doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-9-231
Meyer, O. et al. Cationic liposomes coated with polyethylene glycol as carriers for oligonucleotides. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 15621–15627 (1998).
pubmed: 9624154
doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.25.15621
Floch, V. et al. Systemic administration of cationic phosphonolipids/DNA complexes and the relationship between formulation and lung transfection efficiency. Biochim. et Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Biomembr. 1464, 95–103 (2000).
pubmed: 10704923
doi: 10.1016/S0005-2736(99)00250-3
Densmore, C. L., Giddings, T. H., Waldrep, J. C., Kinsey, B. M. & Knight, V. Gene transfer by guanidinium-cholesterol: dioleoylphosphatidyl‐EtOHamine liposome‐DNA complexes in aerosol. J. Gene. Med. 1, 251–264 (1999).
pubmed: 10738558
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-2254(199907/08)1:4<251::AID-JGM43>3.0.CO;2-Z
Pellegrino, M. et al. Exploiting novel tailored immunotherapies of type 1 diabetes: short interfering RNA delivered by cationic liposomes enables efficient down-regulation of variant PTPN22 gene in T lymphocytes. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 18, 371–379 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2018.11.001
Pozzi, D., & Caracciolo, G. . Looking back, moving forward: lipid nanoparticles as a promising frontier in gene delivery. ACS Pharmacol. Transl Sci. 6, 1561–1573 (2023).
pubmed: 37974625
pmcid: 10644400
doi: 10.1021/acsptsci.3c00185