Rationale and design of healthy at home for COPD: an integrated remote patient monitoring and virtual pulmonary rehabilitation pilot study.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Digital medicine
Digital phenotype
Mobile integrated health
Journal
Pilot and feasibility studies
ISSN: 2055-5784
Titre abrégé: Pilot Feasibility Stud
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101676536
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Oct 2024
28 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
26
01
2024
accepted:
16
10
2024
medline:
29
10
2024
pubmed:
29
10
2024
entrez:
29
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common, costly, and morbid condition. Pulmonary rehabilitation, close monitoring, and early intervention during acute exacerbations of symptoms represent a comprehensive approach to improve outcomes, but the optimal means of delivering these services is uncertain. Logistical, financial, and social barriers to providing healthcare through face-to-face encounters, paired with recent developments in technology, have stimulated interest in exploring alternative models of care. The Healthy at Home study seeks to determine the feasibility of a multimodal, digitally enhanced intervention provided to participants with COPD longitudinally over 6 months. This paper details the recruitment, methods, and analysis plan for the study, which is recruiting 100 participants in its pilot phase. Participants were provided with several integrated services including a smartwatch to track physiological data, a study app to track symptoms and study instruments, access to a mobile integrated health program for acute clinical needs, and a virtual comprehensive pulmonary support service. Participants shared physiologic, demographic, and symptom reports, electronic health records, and claims data with the study team, facilitating a better understanding of their symptoms and potential care needs longitudinally. The Healthy at Home study seeks to develop a comprehensive digital phenotype of COPD by tracking and responding to multiple indices of disease behavior and facilitating early and nuanced responses to changes in participants' health status. This study is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06000696).
Identifiants
pubmed: 39468649
doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01560-x
pii: 10.1186/s40814-024-01560-x
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT06000696']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
131Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Faststats: Chronic Lower Respiratory Disease. CDC. 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/copd.htm .
Ford ES. Hospital discharges, readmissions, and ED visits for COPD or bronchiectasis among US adults: findings from the nationwide inpatient sample 2001–2012 and nationwide emergency department sample 2006–2011. Chest. 2015;147(4):989–98.
doi: 10.1378/chest.14-2146
pubmed: 25375955
Chatterjee K, Goyal A, Joshi M. Thirty-day readmissions in adults hospitalized for COPD or bronchiectasis: findings from the nationwide readmission database 2013. Chest. 2017;151(4):943–5.
doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.12.034
pubmed: 28390634
Viniol C, Vogelmeier CF. Exacerbations of COPD. Eur Respir Rev. 2018;27:147. https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0103-2017 .
doi: 10.1183/16000617.0103-2017
Blanchette CM, Gutierrez B, Ory C, Chang E, Akazawa M. Economic burden in direct costs of concomitant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma in a Medicare advantage population. J Manag Care Pharm. 2008;14(2):176–85.
pubmed: 18331119
AlHafidh OZ, Sidhu JS, Virk J, et al. Incidence, predictors, causes, and cost of 30-day hospital readmission in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients undergoing bronchoscopy. Cureus. 2020;12(6): e8607.
pubmed: 32550091
pmcid: 7294856
Pasquale MK, Sun SX, Song F, Hartnett HJ, Stemkowski SA. Impact of exacerbations on health care cost and resource utilization in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with chronic bronchitis from a predominantly Medicare population. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2012;7:757–64.
doi: 10.2147/COPD.S36997
pubmed: 23152680
pmcid: 3496536
Mulpuru S, McKay J, Ronksley PE, Thavorn K, Kobewka DM, Forster AJ. Factors contributing to high-cost hospital care for patients with COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017;12:989–95.
doi: 10.2147/COPD.S126607
pubmed: 28392683
pmcid: 5373828
Press VG, Myers LC, Feemster LC. Preventing COPD readmissions under the hospital readmissions reduction program: how far have we come? Chest. 2021;159(3):996–1006.
doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.10.008
pubmed: 33065106
Wilkinson TMA, Donaldson GC, Hurst JR, Seemungal TAR, Wedzicha JA. Early therapy improves outcomes of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;169(12):1298–303.
doi: 10.1164/rccm.200310-1443OC
pubmed: 14990395
Yawn BP, Thomashow B. Management of patients during and after exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the role of primary care physicians. Int J Gen Med. 2011;4:665–76.
doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S22878
pubmed: 21941453
pmcid: 3177593
Blanchette CM, Gross NJ, Altman P. Rising costs of COPD and the potential for maintenance therapy to slow the trend. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2014;7(2):98–106.
pubmed: 24991394
pmcid: 4049119
Sanchez-Morillo D, Fernandez-Granero MA, Jiménez AL. Detecting COPD exacerbations early using daily telemonitoring of symptoms and k-means clustering: a pilot study. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2015;53(5):441–51.
doi: 10.1007/s11517-015-1252-4
pubmed: 25725628
Lin WY, Verma VK, Lee MY, Lin HC, Lai CS. Prediction of 30-day readmission for COPD patients using accelerometer-based activity monitoring. Sensors. 2019;20(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/s20010217 .
Taylor ML, Thomas EE, Snoswell CL, Smith AC, Caffery LJ. Does remote patient monitoring reduce acute care use? A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2021;11(3): e040232.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040232
pubmed: 33653740
pmcid: 7929874
Cooper CB, Sirichana W, Arnold MT, et al. Remote patient monitoring for the detection of COPD exacerbations. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020;15:2005–13.
doi: 10.2147/COPD.S256907
pubmed: 33061338
pmcid: 7519812
Fan KG, Mandel J, Agnihotri P, Tai-Seale M. Remote patient monitoring technologies for predicting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: review and comparison. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(5): e16147.
doi: 10.2196/16147
pubmed: 32348262
pmcid: 7273236
Irwin DE, Atwood CA Jr, Hays RD, et al. Correlation of PROMIS scales and clinical measures among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with and without exacerbations. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(4):999–1009.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0818-1
pubmed: 25307510
Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Mahoney ER, Tusler M. Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv Res. 2004;39(4 Pt 1):1005–26.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00269.x
pubmed: 15230939
pmcid: 1361049
Richards JB. Calculated decisions: mMRC (Modified Medical Research Council) dyspnea scale. Emerg Med Pract. 2017;19(Suppl 10):1–2.
pubmed: 29068638
Paladini L, Hodder R, Cecchini I, Bellia V, Incalzi RA. The MRC dyspnoea scale by telephone interview to monitor health status in elderly COPD patients. Respir Med. 2010;104(7):1027–34.
doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.12.012
pubmed: 20116231
Jones PW, Harding G, Berry P, Wiklund I, Chen WH, Kline LN. Development and first validation of the COPD assessment test. Eur Respir J. 2009;34(3):648–54.
doi: 10.1183/09031936.00102509
pubmed: 19720809
Cooper CB, Sirichana W, Neufeld EV, Taylor M, Wang X, Dolezal BA. Statistical process control improves the feasibility of remote physiological monitoring in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019;14:2485–96.
doi: 10.2147/COPD.S207626
pubmed: 32009781
pmcid: 6859075
O’Connor L, Reznek M, Hall M, Inzerillo J, Broach JP, Boudreaux E. A mobile integrated health program for the management of undifferentiated acute complaints in older adults is safe and feasible. Acad Emerg Med. 2023;30(11):1110–6.
doi: 10.1111/acem.14791
pubmed: 37597241
pmcid: 10884993
Louras N, Reading Turchioe M, Shafran Topaz L, et al. Mobile integrated health interventions for older adults: a systematic review. Innov Aging. 2023;7(3):igad017.
doi: 10.1093/geroni/igad017
pubmed: 37090165
pmcid: 10114527
Thorlund K, Dron L, Park JJH, Mills EJ. Synthetic and external controls in clinical trials – a primer for researchers. Clin Epidemiol. 2020;12:457–67.
doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S242097
pubmed: 32440224
pmcid: 7218288
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Considerations for the design and conduct of externally controlled trials for drug and biological products (Docket No. FDA-2022-D-2983). FDA; 2023. https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FDA-2022-D-2983/document .
Shah T, Press VG, Huisingh-Scheetz M, White SR. COPD readmissions: addressing COPD in the era of value-based health care. Chest. 2016;150(4):916–26.
doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.05.002
pubmed: 27167208
pmcid: 5812767
Lu CH, Clark CM, Tober R, et al. Readmissions and costs among younger and older adults for targeted conditions during the enactment of the hospital readmission reduction program. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):386.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06399-z
pubmed: 33902569
pmcid: 8077835
Lu N, Huang KC, Johnson JA. Reducing excess readmissions: promising effect of hospital readmissions reduction program in US hospitals. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016;28(1):53–8.
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv090
pubmed: 26573787
Miller BJ, Deutschendorf A, Brotman DJ. The hospital readmissions reduction program: inconvenient observations. J Hosp Med. 2021;16(7):448.
doi: 10.12788/jhm.3663
pubmed: 34197315
Sheehy AM, Kaiksow F, Powell WR, et al. The hospital readmissions reduction program and observation hospitalizations. J Hosp Med. 2021;16(7):409–11.
doi: 10.12788/jhm.3634
pubmed: 34197304
pmcid: 8248819