Large-bore Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Catheter-directed Thrombolysis in the Management of Intermediate-risk Pulmonary Embolism: Primary Results of the PEERLESS Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of randomized controlled trial (RCT) data comparing outcomes of different catheter-based interventions for intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE).

METHODS

PEERLESS is a prospective, multicenter, RCT that enrolled 550 intermediate-risk PE patients with right ventricular dilatation and additional clinical risk factors randomized 1:1 to treatment with large-bore mechanical thrombectomy (LBMT) or catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT). The primary endpoint was a hierarchal win ratio (WR) composite of the following: 1) all-cause mortality, 2) intracranial hemorrhage, 3) major bleeding, 4) clinical deterioration and/or escalation to bailout, and 5) postprocedural intensive care unit (ICU) admission and length of stay, assessed at the sooner of hospital discharge or 7 days post-procedure. Assessments at the 24-hour visit included respiratory rate, mMRC dyspnea score, NYHA classification, right ventricle (RV)/left ventricle (LV) ratio reduction, and RV function. Endpoints through 30 days included total hospital stay, all-cause readmission, and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint occurred significantly less frequently with LBMT vs CDT (WR 5.01 [95% CI: 3.68-6.97];

CONCLUSIONS

PEERLESS met its primary endpoint in favor of LBMT vs CDT in treatment of intermediate-risk PE. LBMT had lower rates of clinical deterioration and/or bailout and postprocedural ICU utilization compared with CDT, with no difference in mortality or bleeding.