Robotic abdominopelvic surgery: a systematic review of cross-platform outcomes.
Hintori
Hugo
KangDuo
Micro-hand
Revo-I
Robotic surgery
Senhance
Versius
da Vinci
Journal
Journal of robotic surgery
ISSN: 1863-2491
Titre abrégé: J Robot Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101300401
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Oct 2024
29 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
12
08
2024
accepted:
14
10
2024
medline:
29
10
2024
pubmed:
29
10
2024
entrez:
29
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
As the global surgical robotic ecosystem diversifies, multi-platform surgery is becoming increasingly common. The natural question is whether these robots differ in performance and cost. We address this question and report the first systematic review comparing platforms. A systematic search identified clinical studies comparing at least two platforms. Of 287 studies, 31 were included, with 5 RCTs and 26 cohort studies, including 3624 patients. All studies compared da Vinci with Hintori, Hugo, KangDuo, Micro-Hand, Revo-I, Senhance, and Versius robots. Comparisons were across specialties: urology (18 studies; upper and lower tract), general surgery (11 studies; inguinal and ventral hernia, cholecystectomy, colorectal, pancreatic, oesophagectomy, distal gastrectomy), gynaecology (3 studies; hysterectomy, sacrocolpopexy). There were no differences in conversion rate, estimated blood loss, complication rate, pathological parameters, oncological outcomes (6 months), and functional outcomes (12 months). Results were mixed on operative time and its components. Length of stay was largely similar. Surgeon task load was similar (2 studies). Operative cost was 45-60% lower on the newer platforms (3 studies). Operative, clinical, oncological, and functional outcomes were similar for da Vinci and the newer robots across a range of abdominopelvic procedures, with a signal of lower cost on newer types. Studies were heterogeneous. Data on non-technical skills, other human factors, and comparative learning curves was scant. The majority of evidence was low quality and retrospective. However, accumulating evidence on safety, efficacy, and non-inferiority of the newer platforms has implications for robotic training programmes and procurement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39470929
doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02144-w
pii: 10.1007/s11701-024-02144-w
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
386Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Mehta A, Ngi JC, Awuah WA, Huang H, Kalmanovich J, Agrawal A, Abdul-Rahman T, Hasan MM, Sikora V, Isikh A (2022) Embracing robotic surgery in low- and middle-income countries: potential benefits, challenges, and scope in the future. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 84:104803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104803 . ((Published online 2022))
doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104803
pubmed: 36582867
Motoyama D, Matsushita Y, Watanabe H, Tamura K, Otsuka A, Fujisawa M, Miyake H (2023) Robot-assisted radical nephrectomy using novel surgical robot platform, hinotori: report of initial series of 13 cases. Int J Urol 30(12):1175–1179. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.15292
doi: 10.1111/iju.15292
pubmed: 37654155
Motoyama D, Matsushita Y, Watanabe H, Tamura K, Otsuka A, Fujisawa M, Miyake H (2023) Robot-assisted adrenalectomy using a hinotori surgical robot system: REPORT of first series of six cases. Asian J Endosc Surg 16(3):489–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.13212
doi: 10.1111/ases.13212
pubmed: 37231618
Motoyama D, Matsushita Y, Watanabe H, Tamura K, Otsuka A, Fujisawa M, Miyake H (2023) Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy using hinotori versus da Vinci surgical robot system: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Robot Surg 17(5):2435–2440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01614-x
doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01614-x
pubmed: 37462888
Kohjimoto Y, Yamashita S, Iwagami S, Muraoka S, Wakamiya T, Hara I (2024) hinotoriTM vs. da Vinci®: propensity score-matched analysis of surgical outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Robot Surg 18(1):130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-01877-y
doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01877-y
pubmed: 38498237
Matsuura M, Nagao S, Kurokawa S, Tamate M, Akimoto T, Saito T (2024) Early outcomes of three new robotic surgical systems in patients undergoing hysterectomy. Updates Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-01891-7
doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01891-7
pubmed: 38787495
Nakayama A, Izumi K, Ikezoe E, Inoue M, Tsujioka H, Nirazuka A, Hasegawa K, Osaka A, Yasuda Y, Fukuda Y, Inoue Y, Iwahata T, Setoguchi K, Saito K (2024) Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the novel hinotoriTM surgical robot system: initial experience and operation learning curve at a single institution. Transl Cancer Res 13(1):57–64. https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-23-1025
doi: 10.21037/tcr-23-1025
pubmed: 38410216
pmcid: 10894360
Noshiro H, Ide T, Nomura A, Yoda Y, Hiraki M, Manabe T (2024) Introduction of a new surgical robot platform “hinotori™” in an institution with established da Vinci surgery™ for digestive organ operations. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10918-4 . (PMID: 38839604)
doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10918-4
pubmed: 38839604
Sasaki Y, Kusuhara Y, Oyama T, Nishiyama M, Kobayashi S, Daizumoto K, Tomida R, Ueno Y, Fukawa T, Yamaguchi K, Yamamoto Y, Takahashi M, Kanayama H, Furukawa J (2024) Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg MRCAS 20(3):2648 [Int J Med Robot], ISSN: 1478–596X: Wiley; PMID: 38824454, Database: MEDLINE PubMed
Tsuji T, Inaki N, Takenaka S, Mitta K, Hayashi S, Shimada M, Saito H, Yamamoto D, Moriyama H, Kinoshita J (2024) Initial 12 cases of robot-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer using the hinotori surgical robot system: tips for the efficient introduction of a new surgical robot. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 34(5):393–400. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2023.0521 . (8p, Database: Academic Search Index)
doi: 10.1089/lap.2023.0521
Bravi CA, Balestrazzi E, De Loof M, Rebuffo S, Piramide F, Mottaran A, Paciotti M, Sorce G, Nocera L, Sarchi L, Peraire M, Colla’-Ruvolo C, Frego N, Piro A, Ticonosco M, De Backer P, Farinha R, Van Den Bossche H, De Naeyer G, D’Hondt F, De Groote R, Mottrie A (2023) Eur Urol Focus 25:S2405-4569(23)00187–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2023.08.001 . (Online ahead of print. Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performed with Different Robotic Platforms: First Comparative Evidence Between Da Vinci and HUGO Robot-assisted Surgery Robots)
doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.08.001
Ruvolo CC, Afonina M, Balestrazzi E, Paciotti M, Piro A, Piramide F, Bravi CA, Lores MP, Sorce G, Belmonte M, Rebuffo S, Ticonosco M, Frego N, Gaia G, De Groote R, Mottrie A, De Naeyer G (2023) A comparative analysis of the HUGOTM robot-assisted surgery system and the Da Vinci® Xi surgical system for robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse treatment. Int J Med Robot. 20:e2587. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2587 . (Online ahead of print)
doi: 10.1002/rcs.2587
Brime Menendez R, García Rojo E, Hevia Palacios V, Feltes Ochoa JA, Justo Quintas J, Lista Mateos F, Fraile A, Manfredi C, Belli S, Bozzini G, Romero Otero J (2024) Da Vinci vs. Hugo RAS for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparative single-center study. World J Urol 42(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05045-7 . (9p, Database: Academic Search Index)
doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05045-7
García Rojo E, Hevia Palacios V, Brime Menendez R, Feltes Ochoa JA, Justo Quintas J, Lista Mateos F, Touijer K, Otero Romero J (2024) Da Vinci and Hugo RAS Platforms for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a preliminary prospective comparative analysis of the outcomes. Minerva Urol Nephrol 76(3):303–311 (ISSN: 2724–6442, Publisher: Edizioni Minerva Medica; PMID: 38757775, Database: MEDLINE PubMed)
doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05623-4
pubmed: 38757775
Ou YY, Ou HC, Juan YS, Narasimhan R, Mottrie A, Weng WC, Huang LH, Lin YS, Hsu CY, Yang CH, Tung MC (2024) Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using hugo RAS system: the pioneer experience in Taiwan and Northeast Asia. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 20(1):e2577
doi: 10.1002/rcs.2577
Sighinolfi MC, Messina LA, Stocco M, Moscovas MC, Pelliccia P, Palma A, Rossini M, Gallo A, Ramondo A, Pozzi E, Assumma S, Terzoni S, Sandri M, Patel V, Rocco B (2024) Cost analysis of new robotic competitors: a comparison of direct costs for initial hospital stay between Da Vinci and Hugo RAS for radical prostatectomy. J Robot Surg 18(1):1–4 (4p)
doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01930-w
Fan S, Xiong S, Li Z, Yang K, Wang J, Han G, Li X, Chen S, Yuan C, Meng C, Dai X, Mu L, Li X, Zhou L (2022) Pyeloplasty with the Kangduo surgical robot vs the da Vinci Si robotic system: preliminary results. J Endourol 36(12):1538–1544. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2022.0366 . (7p, Database: Academic Search Index. Prior robotic experience 100. Transperitoneal, 2 assistant ports. Operative steps, images)
doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0366
pubmed: 35864812
Fan S, Hao H, Chen S, Wang J, Dai X, Zhang M, Chen X, Li Z, Xiong S, Han G, Zhu J, Zhang Z, Yu W, Cui L, Shen C, Zhou L, Li X (2023) Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using the KangDuo surgical robot system vs the da Vinci Si robotic system. J Endourol 37(5):568–574. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2022.0739 . (7p, Database: Academic Search Index)
doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0739
pubmed: 36924278
Li X, Xu W, Fan S, Xiong S, Dong J, Wang J, Dai X, Yang K, Xie Y, Liu G, Meng C, Zhang Z, Cai L, Zhang C, Zhang Z, Ji Z, Shen C, Zhou L (2023) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with the newly developed KangDuo surgical robot versus the da vinci si surgical system: a double-center prospective randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Eur Urol Focus 9(1):133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2022.07.008 . (Language: Englis,h Database: ScienceDirect)
doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.07.008
pubmed: 36446724
Liu Y, Wang Y, Wang C, Wang X, Zhang X, Yang Y, Wei Z, Xiao Y, Wang G (2024) Comparison of short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted radical colon cancer surgery using the Kangduo surgical robotic system and the Da Vinci Si robotic system: a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg (London, England) 110(3):1511–1518 (ISSN: 1743–9159, Publisher: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc; PMID: 38085814, Database: MEDLINE PubMed)
Shen C, Yan W, Chen S, Xu W, Wang X, Dong J, Zhang Z, Yang K, Fan S, Li Z, Chen X, Zhang M, Jin Z, Meng Y, Cai L, Zhang K, Zhang Z, Mu L, Ji Z, Zhou L, Li X (2024) Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the KangDuo surgical system versus the da Vinci Si system: a prospective, double-center, randomized controlled trial. Eur Urol Focus (ISSN: 2405–4569, 2024; Publisher: Elsevier B.V; PMID: 38862329, Database: MEDLINE PubMed)
Sun Z, Ma T, Huang Z, Lu J, Xu L, Wang Y, Li X, Wei Z, Wang G, Xiao Y (2024) Robot-assisted radical resection of colorectal cancer using the KangDuo surgical robot versus the da Vinci Xi robotic system: short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled noninferiority trial. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 38(4):1867–1876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10682-5 . (10p, Database: Academic Search Index)
doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10682-5
Jiang J, Zhu S, Yi B, Li J (2021) Comparison of the short-term operative, oncological, and functional outcomes between two types of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Da Vinci versus Micro Hand S surgical robot. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 17(4):1–10 (10p. Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell., Database)
doi: 10.1002/rcs.2260
Zeng Y, Wang G, Li Z, Lin H, Zhu S, Yi B (2021) The micro hand S vs. da Vinci surgical robot-assisted surgery on total mesorectal excision: short-term outcomes using propensity score matching analysis. Front Surg 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.656270 (PMID: 34046424 PMCID: PMC8144723)
Wang G, Yi B, Li Z, Zhu L, Hao L, Zeng Y, Zhu S (2022) Micro-Hand robot-assisted versus da Vinci robot-assisted cholecystectomy: a multi-centre, randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 46(11):2632–2641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06668-w . (10p, Database: Academic Search Index)
doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06668-w
pubmed: 35857076
Alip S, Koukourikis P, Han WK, Rha KH, Na JC (2022) Comparing Revo-i and da Vinci in Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a preliminary propensity score analysis of outcomes. J Endourol 36(1):104–110 (ISSN: 1557–900X, Publisher: Mary Ann Liebert; PMID: 34375129, Database: MEDLINE PubMed)
doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0421
pubmed: 34375129
Kim SJ, Choi M, Hwang HS, Lee WJ, Kang CM (2024) The Revo-i robotic surgical system in advanced pancreatic surgery: a second non-randomized clinical trial and comparative analysis to the da Vinci™ system. Yonsei Med J 65(3):148–155 (8p. Publisher: Yonsei University College of Medicine., Database: Supplemental Index)
doi: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0140
pubmed: 38373834
pmcid: 10896669
Coussons H, Feldstein J, McCarus S (2021) Senhance surgical system in benign hysterectomy: a real-world comparative assessment of case times and instrument costs versus da Vinci robotics and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy procedures. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg MRCAS 17(4):2261 (ISSN: 1478–596X, Publisher: Wiley; PMID: 33860631, Database: MEDLINE PubMed. <Emphasis Type="Italic">Senhance cost comparable to laparoscopic</Emphasis>)
doi: 10.1002/rcs.2261
Lin YC, Yuan LH, Tseng CS, Hsieh TY, Huang YW, Huang CY, Huang SW (2024) Comparison of senhance and da vinci robotic radical prostatectomy: short-term outcomes, learning curve, and cost analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 27(1):116–121 (6p)
doi: 10.1038/s41391-023-00717-8
pubmed: 37660219
Tran T, Irizarry F, Gunda S, Danos D, Cook M (2024) Early experience with the Senhance surgical system in bariatric surgery. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 28(1) (ISSN: 1938–3797, Publisher: Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons; PMID: 38405217, Database: MEDLINE PubMed)
Hussein AA, Mohsin R, Qureshi H, Leghari R, Jing Z, Ramahi YO, Rizvi I, Guru KA, Rizvi A (2023) Transition from da Vinci to Versius robotic surgical system: initial experience and outcomes of over 100 consecutive procedures. J Robot Surg 17(2):419–426 (Date of Publication: April 2023)
doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01422-9
pubmed: 35752748
Halabi M, Khoury K, Alomar A, Dahdah JE, Hassan O, Hayyan K, Bishara E, Moussa H (2024) Operative efficiency: a comparative analysis of Versius and da Vinci robotic systems in abdominal surgery. J Robot Surg 18(1):1–7 (7p)
doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01806-5
Ibrahim A, Hamid S, Leila A (2022) Assessment of the Versius robotic surgical system in minimal access surgery: a systematic review. J Clin Med 11(13):3754. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133754 . (Published online 2022, PMCID: PMC9267445. PMID: 35807035)
doi: 10.3390/jcm11133754
Diez-Barroso R Jr, Palacio CH, Martinez JA, Makris K, Massarweh NN, Chai CY, Awad SS, Cao HST (2018) Robotic port-site hernias after general surgical procedures. J Surg Res 230:7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.04.032 . (Epub 2018 May 12)
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.04.032
pubmed: 30100042
Damani T, James L, Fisher JC, Shah PC (2021) J Robot Surg 15(3):457–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01128-w . (Epub 2020 Jul 24. Incidence of acute postoperative robotic port-site hernias: results from a high-volume multispecialty center)
doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01128-w
pubmed: 32710254
Sighinolfi MC, Terzoni S, Scanferla E, Bianchi PP, Formisano G, Piccolo G, Barabino M, Pisani A, Salaj A, Gaia G, Marconi AM, Turri F, Sangalli M, Centanni S, Stocco M, Chiumello D, Assumma S, Sarchi L, Calcagnile T, Panio E et al (2023) Prior robotic console expertise may improve basic skills at the New Hugo RAS simulator: results from a cohort trial and implications for skill transference across platforms. Eur Urol Open Sci 53:83–89
doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.04.008
pubmed: 37441345
pmcid: 10334229
Larkins KM, Helen MM, Matthew G, Daniel MC, Anthony JC, Alexander GH, Satish KW (2023) Transferability of robotic console skills by early robotic surgeons: a multi-platform crossover trial of simulation training. J Robot Surg 17(3):859–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01475-w . (Epub 2022 Nov 2. PMID: 36324049 PMCID: PMC10209232)
doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01475-w
pubmed: 36324049
Braune R (1989) The common/same type rating: human factors and other issues. Boeing commercial aeroplanes. Seattle, Washington. Vol. 98, Section 1: JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE. SAE International, 1455–1459
Khandalavala K, Shimon T, Flores L, Armijo PR, Oleynikov D (2020) Emerging surgical robotic technology: a progression toward microbots. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg 5:3. https://doi.org/10.21037/ales
doi: 10.21037/ales
Hopko S, Wang J, Mehta R (2022) Human factors considerations and metrics in shared space human-robot collaboration: a systematic review. Front Robot AI 9:799522. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.799522 . (eCollection2022.PMID:35187093PMCID:PMC8850717DOI:10.3389/frobt.2022.799522)
doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.799522
pubmed: 35187093
pmcid: 8850717