Reoperation Rates and Risk Factors after Spinal Cord Stimulation Revision Surgery.
Chronic pain
Persistent spinal pain syndrome
Reoperation
Spinal cord stimulation
revision surgery
Journal
Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery
ISSN: 1423-0372
Titre abrégé: Stereotact Funct Neurosurg
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 8902881
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Oct 2024
29 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
16
02
2024
accepted:
10
09
2024
medline:
30
10
2024
pubmed:
30
10
2024
entrez:
29
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective treatment for patients with refractory chronic pain. Despite its efficacy, rates of reoperation after initial implantation of SCS remain high. While revision rates after index SCS surgeries are well reported, less is known about rates and risk factors associated with repeat reoperations. We sought to evaluate patient, clinical, and surgical characteristics associated with repeat reoperation among patients who underwent an initial SCS revision procedure. We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent SCS revision surgery performed at a single institution between 2008 and 2022. Patients were stratified by whether they underwent a single revision (SR) or multiple revision (MR) surgeries. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine risk factors associated with repeat SCS revision. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare rates of devices requiring revision across groups. A total of 54 patients underwent an initial SCS revision. Of these, 15 (28%) underwent a second revision. The most common indication for revision surgery was lead migration (65%). No significant differences were observed in age, body mass index, comorbidities, lead type, and revision indication among the SR and MR groups. On multivariate adjusted analysis, only cervical lead position was significantly associated with repeat reoperation (OR 7.10, 95% CI [1.14, 44.3], p = 0.036). Time to reoperation after a single and MR SCS surgeries did not differ. Among patients who undergo SCS reoperation, a substantial portion requires additional revisions. Cervical lead placement may be associated with a higher risk of repeat revision surgery compared to thoracic lead positioning. Consideration of lead positioning in the decision to perform and undergo reoperation may therefore result in lower revision rates and improved clinical outcomes among SCS patients with MRs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39471795
pii: 000541445
doi: 10.1159/000541445
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1-11Informations de copyright
© 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel.