Lithium disilicate, full coverage crowns: what is the effect of using conventional impressions compared to digital impression with respect to the internal fit of the restoration? A systematic review.
Journal
Evidence-based dentistry
ISSN: 1476-5446
Titre abrégé: Evid Based Dent
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883603
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Oct 2024
30 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
26
04
2024
accepted:
05
08
2024
medline:
30
10
2024
pubmed:
30
10
2024
entrez:
30
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Digital dentistry provides an alternative to fabrication of crowns. This systematic review focuses on the accuracy of the mean internal space of lithium disilicate crowns when comparing intraoral scanning to conventional impressions. Ovid Medline, Cochrane and PUBMED were searched and the review protocol followed the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42023379908) and guided by The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Cohen Kappa coefficient confirmed the agreement of data. The revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was utilised to evaluate randomised controlled trials The Methodological Index for non-randomised controlled trials. Of the six in vivo studies, three concluded that digital techniques improved the internal fit over their conventional counterparts. Two found that there was no significant difference and one indicated that digital technique resulted in an inferior internal fit. Of the eight in vitro studies, two concluded digital techniques to be superior, two found digital techniques to be inferior and four found no significant difference. Significant heterogeneity between studies limits the potential any systematic review of the internal fit of dental crowns when comparing conventional and optical impressions. This systematic review indicates digital methodology is comparable to that of conventional impressions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39472507
doi: 10.1038/s41432-024-01075-7
pii: 10.1038/s41432-024-01075-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to British Dental Association.
Références
Christensen GJ. The challenge to conventional impressions. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:347–49. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0165 .
doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0165
pubmed: 18310740
Chochlidakis KM, Papaspyridakos P, Geminiani A, Chen C-J, Feng IJ, Ercoli C. Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116:184–190.e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.017
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.017
pubmed: 26946916
van der Zande MM, Gorter RC, Aartman IHA, Wismeijer D. Adoption and use of digital technologies among general dental practitioners in the Netherlands. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0120725.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120725
pubmed: 25811594
pmcid: 4374680
Strub JR, Rekow ED, Witkowski S. Computer-aided design and fabrication of dental restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137:1289–96. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0389
doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0389
pubmed: 16946436
Tsirogiannis P, Reissmann DR, Heydecke G. Evaluation of the marginal fit of single-unit, complete-coverage ceramic restorations fabricated after digital and conventional impressions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116:328–335.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.028
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.028
pubmed: 27061627
Hany M, Abd Elghany A, Sulaiman A, Alothmani A, Hussain A, Ali K. et al. (n.d.). EC DENTAL SCIENCE EC DENTAL SCIENCE Review Article E Max Crowns in Dentistry. [online] Available at: https://ecronicon.org/assets/ecde/pdf/ECDE-19-01558.pdf [Accessed 10 Jun. 2023]
Kanout C. Evaluation of the translucency properties for CAD/CAM full ceramic crowns fabricated from glass ceramics (E.max) or High Translucency Zirconia (Lava Plus): a clinical study. Cureus. 2023;15:e34935. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34935 .
Conrad, HJ, Seong, W-J and Pesun, IJ (2007). Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;98:389–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60124-3 .
McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J. 1971;131:107–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
pubmed: 5283545
Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62:405–08. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90170-4
doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90170-4
pubmed: 2685240
Hasanzade M, Shirani M, Afrashtehfar KI, Naseri P, Alikhasi M. In vivo and in vitro comparison of internal and marginal fit of digital and conventional impressions for full-coverage fixed restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2019;19:236–54.
doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2019.04.003
pubmed: 31732100
Tuntiprawon M, Wilson PR. The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. Aust Dent J. 1995;40:17–21.
doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1995.tb05607.x
pubmed: 7710410
Zimmer S, Göhlich O, Rüttermann S, Lang H, Raab WH-M, Barthel CR. Long-term survival of cerec restorations: a 10-year study. Operat Dent. 2008;33:484–487.
doi: 10.2341/07-142
Soleimani F, Jalali H, Mostafavi AS, Zeighami S, Memarian M. Retention and clinical performance of zirconia crowns: a comprehensive review. Int J Dent. 2020, pp.1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8846534 .
Dahl BE, Rønold HJ, Dahl JE. Internal fit of single crowns produced by CAD-CAM and lost-wax metal casting technique assessed by the triple-scan protocol. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117:400–04.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.06.017
pubmed: 27692584
Nawafleh NA, Mack F, Evans J, Mackay J, Hatamleh MM. Accuracy and reliability of methods to measure marginal adaptation of crowns and FDPs: a literature review. J Prosthodont. 2013;22:419–28.
doi: 10.1111/jopr.12006
pubmed: 23289599
Contrepois M, Soenen A, Bartala M, Laviole O. Marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;110:447–454.e10.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.08.003
pubmed: 24120071
Lo Russo L, Caradonna G, Biancardino M, De Lillo A, Troiano G, Guida L. Digital versus conventional workflow for the fabrication of multiunit fixed prostheses: a systematic review and meta-analysis of vertical marginal fit in controlled in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;122, pp.435–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.12.001 .
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 .
doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/843571/ .
doi: 10.2307/2529310
pubmed: 843571
Science Direct, 2023, Kappa-statistics. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/kappa-statistics (Accessed 10/05/2023)
Cochrane.org. (2019). Chapter 24: Including non-randomized studies on intervention effects. [online] Available at: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-24 .
Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928 .
doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928
pubmed: 22008217
pmcid: 3196245
Slim K, Ninin E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J. Methodological index for non-randomised studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73:712–16.
doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x
pubmed: 12956787
Miwa A, Kori H, Tsukiyama Y, Kuwatsuru R, Matsushita Y, Koyano K. Fit of e.max crowns fabricated using conventional and CAD/CAM technology: a comparative study. Int J Prosthodont, 2016;29:602–07.
PEDROCHE LO, BERNARDES SR, LEÃO MP, KINTOPP CCdeA, CORRER GM, ORNAGHI BP, et al. Marginal and internal fit of zirconia copings obtained using different digital scanning methods. Braz Oral Res. 2016;30:e113.
doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0113
pubmed: 27737366
Al-Atyaa ZT, Majeed MA. Comparative evaluation of the marginal and internal fitness of monolithic CAD/CAM zirconia crowns fabricated from different conventional impression techniques and digital impression using silicone replica technique (An in vitro study). Biomed Pharmacol J. 2018;11:477–90.
doi: 10.13005/bpj/1397
Kenyon BJ, Hagge MS, Leknius C, Daniels WC, Weed ST. Dimensional accuracy of 7 die materials. J Prosthodont. 2005;14:25–31.
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2005.00007.x
pubmed: 15733132
Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent. 2010;38:553–59.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.03.015
pubmed: 20381576
Abduo J, Elseyoufi M. Accuracy of intraoral scanners: a systematic review of influencing factors. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2018;26:101–21.
pubmed: 29989757
Wismeijer D, Mans R, van Genuchten M, Reijers HA. Patients’ preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;25:1113–18.
doi: 10.1111/clr.12234
pubmed: 23941118
Haralur SB, Al-Qahtani AS, Al-Qarni MM, Al-Homrany RM, Aboalkhair AE, Madalakote SS. The dental solid waste management in different categories of dental laboratories in Abha City, Saudia Arabia. Open Dent J. 2015;9:449–54. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601509010449 .
doi: 10.2174/1874210601509010449
pubmed: 26962373
pmcid: 4768654
Zeltner M, Sailer I, Mühlemann S, Özcan M, Hämmerle CHF, Benic GI. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;117:354–62.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.04.028
pubmed: 27677220
Özsürmeli H, TürkerŞ. (2021). In vitro evaluation of the marginal and internal accuracy of different types of dental ceramic restorations fabricated based on digital and conventional impressions. Int J Prosthodont, pp.61–69. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.6443 .
Atos HPC Software Suites Embracing digital sustainability. (n.d.). Available at: https://atos.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/HPC-Software-Suites-position-paper.pdf [Accessed 13 Nov. 2023].
www.gom.com . (n.d.). GOM Inspect Pro: Making quality easily visible | Software for 3D inspections. [online] Available at: https://www.gom.com/en/products/zeiss-quality-suite/gom-inspect-pro .
Public Health England (2020). Guidance Notes for Dental Practitioners on the Safe Use of X-ray Equipment 2nd Edition Endorsed by. [online] Available at: https://www.rqia.org.uk/RQIA/files/44/449bdd1c-ccb0-4322-b0df-616a0de88fe4.pdf .
York.ac.uk. (2019). PROSPERO. [online] Available at: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ .
Abduljawad DE, Rayyan MR. Marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate endocrowns fabricated using conventional, digital, and combination techniques. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2016;34:707–14.
doi: 10.1111/jerd.12902
Alfaro DP, Ruse ND, Carvalho RM, Wyatt CC. Assessment of the internal fit of lithium disilicate crowns using micro-CT. J Prosthodont. 2015;24:381–86.
doi: 10.1111/jopr.12274
pubmed: 25753858
Anadioti E, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, Holloway JA, Denry IL, Thomas GW, et al. Internal fit of pressed and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;113:304–09.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.09.015
pubmed: 25488521
Dahl BE, Dahl JE, Rønold HJ. Digital evaluation of marginal and internal fit of single-crown fixed dental prostheses. Eur J Oral Sci. 2018;126:512–17.
doi: 10.1111/eos.12576
pubmed: 30298624
Kim JH, Jeong JH, Lee JH, Cho HW. Fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated from conventional and digital impressions assessed with micro-CT. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116:551–57.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.028
pubmed: 27422237
Al Hamad KQ, Al Quran FA, AlJalam SA, Baba NZ. Comparison of the accuracy of fit of metal, zirconia, and lithium disilicate crowns made from different manufacturing techniques. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:497–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13029
doi: 10.1111/jopr.13029
pubmed: 30719780
Lee J-H, Son K, Lee K-B. Marginal and internal fit of ceramic restorations fabricated using digital scanning and conventional impressions: a clinical study. J Clin Med. 2020;9:4035.
doi: 10.3390/jcm9124035
pubmed: 33327402
pmcid: 7764839
Park JS, Lim YJ, Kim B, Kim MJ, Kwon HB. Clinical evaluation of time efficiency and fit accuracy of lithium disilicate single crowns between conventional and digital impression. Materials, 2020;13:5467.
Al Hamad KQ, Al Rashdan BA, Al Omari WM, Baba NZ. Comparison of the fit of lithium disilicate crowns made from conventional, digital, or conventional/digital techniques. J Prosthodont. 2018;28:e580–e586.
pubmed: 30091168
Haddadi Y, Bahrami G, Isidor F. Accuracy of crowns based on digital intraoral scanning compared to conventional impression—a split-mouth randomised clinical study. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23:4043–50.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02840-0
pubmed: 30796587