A multi-index comprehensive evaluation method for assessing the water use balance between economic society and ecology considering efficiency-development-health-harmony.
Development
Efficiency
Harmony
Health
Henan Province
Multi Index evaluation
Water use balance
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 10 2024
29 10 2024
Historique:
received:
11
06
2024
accepted:
22
10
2024
medline:
30
10
2024
pubmed:
30
10
2024
entrez:
30
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Quantitative assessment of the water use balance between economic society and ecology (EEWB) is the basis for coordinating the competitive relationship of water use between human activity and ecological requirements and. It is of great significance for optimizing the water resources carrying capacity and achieving a healthy regional water balance. Based on the concept of harmonious balance, this paper puts forward the definition and connotation of EEWB regarding the competition in water use between economic society and ecology. And, a novel framework for assessing the EEWB is proposed. It has four aspects relating to water resources, economic society, ecology, and human-water relationship. Linked to these aspects the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) technique, Water Ecological Footprint (WEF) model, InVEST model and indicators system of human-water relationship are used to establish a water resources efficiency index (I
Identifiants
pubmed: 39472634
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77340-7
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-77340-7
doi:
Substances chimiques
Water
059QF0KO0R
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
25924Subventions
Organisme : National Key Research and Development Program of China
ID : 2021YFC3200201
Organisme : China Engineering Science and Technology Development Strategy Henan Research Institute Strategic Consulting Research Project
ID : 2024HENYB01
Organisme : Science and Technology Projects of Henan Province, China
ID : 242102320254
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Cosgrove, W. J. & Loucks, D. P. Water management: Current and future challenges and research directions. Water Resour. Res. 51(6), 4823–4839 (2015).
doi: 10.1002/2014WR016869
Cheng, H., Hu, Y. & Zhao, J. Meeting China’s water shortage crisis: Current practices and challenges. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43(2), 240–244 (2009).
pubmed: 19238946
doi: 10.1021/es801934a
Sun, S. et al. Sustainability assessment of regional water resources under the DPSIR framework. J. Hydrol. 532, 140–148 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.11.028
Salehi, M. Global water shortage and potable water safety; Today’s concern and tomorrow’s crisis. Environ. Int. 158, 106936 (2022).
pubmed: 34655888
doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106936
Radmehr, R., Ghorbani, M. & Ziaei, A. N. Quantifying and managing the water-energy-food nexus in dry regions food insecurity: New methods and evidence. Agric. Water Manag. 245, 106588 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106588
Wang, H. et al. Theory and methodology of water resources assessment based on dualistic water cycle model. J. Hydraul. Eng. 37(12), 1496–1502 (2006).
Feng, J. Optimal allocation of regional water resources based on multi-objective dynamic equilibrium strategy. Appl. Math. Modell. 90, 1183–1203 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2020.10.027
Sisto, N. P. Environmental flows for rivers and economic compensation for irrigators. J. Environ. Manage. 90(2), 1236–1240 (2009).
pubmed: 18678441
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.06.005
Cheng, B. & Li, H. Agricultural economic losses caused by protection of the ecological basic flow of rivers. J. Hydrol. 564, 68–75 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.065
Zhang, Y. et al. Optimal water allocation scheme based on trade-offs between economic and ecological water demands in the Heihe River Basin of Northwest China. Sci. Total Environ. 703, 134958 (2020).
pubmed: 31726306
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134958
Tarebari, H. et al. Multi-objective surface water resource management considering conflict resolution and utility function optimization. Water Resour. Manage. 32, 4487–4509 (2018).
doi: 10.1007/s11269-018-2051-0
Monteiro, L., Cristina, R. & Covas, D. Water and energy efficiency assessment in urban green spaces. Energies 14(17), 5490 (2021).
doi: 10.3390/en14175490
Zuo, Q. et al. The basic principle and theoretical system of regional water balance. Adv. Water Sci. 33(2), 165–173 (2022).
Zhang, J. et al. Regional water balance and the path to healthy water balance. Adv. Water Sci. 34(3), 323–335 (2023).
Li, M. et al. A novel framework for integrative assessment of water balance health in China. J. Clean. Prod. 443, 141199 (2024).
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141199
Zhang, J. & Dong, Z. Assessment of coupling coordination degree and water resources carrying capacity of Hebei Province (China) based on WRESP2D2P framework and GTWR approach. Sustain. Cities Soc. 82, 103862 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103862
Xing, L., Xue, M. & Hu, M. Dynamic simulation and assessment of the coupling coordination degree of the economy–resource–environment system: Case of Wuhan City in China. J. Environ. Manage. 230, 474–487 (2019).
pubmed: 30340121
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.065
Byrnes, J. et al. The relative economic efficiency of urban water utilities in regional New South Wales and Victoria. Resour. Energy Econ. 32(3), 439–455 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.08.001
Morán-Valencia, M., Flegl, M. & Güemes-Castorena, D. A state-level analysis of the water system management efficiency in Mexico: Two-stage DEA approach. Water Resour. Ind. 29, 100200 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.wri.2022.100200
Martínez-Ibáñez, E. et al. Integrating the water-energy-food nexus and LCA+ DEA methodology for sustainable fisheries management: A case study of Cantabrian fishing fleets. Sci. Total Environ. 949, 175223 (2024).
pubmed: 39097018
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175223
Nathaniel S P., 2020. Economic complexity versus ecological footprint in the era of globalization: evidence from ASEAN countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(45): 64871–64881. environmental management, 262: 110331.
Jing, P. et al. Spatiotemporal evolution of sustainable utilization of water resources in the Yangtze River economic belt based on an integrated water ecological footprint model. J. Clean. Prod. 358, 132035 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132035
Redhead, J. W. et al. Empirical validation of the InVEST water yield ecosystem service model at a national scale. Sci. Total Environ. 569, 1418–1426 (2016).
pubmed: 27395076
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.227
Caro, C. et al. Ecosystem services as a resilience descriptor in habitat risk assessment using the InVEST model. Ecol. Indic. 115, 106426 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106426
Valladares-Castellanos, M. et al. A framework for validating watershed ecosystem service models in the United States using long-term water quality data: Applications with the InVEST Nutrient Delivery (NDR) model in Puerto Rico. Sci. Total Environ. 175111, 143167 (2024).
Liu, P. et al. Comprehensive evaluation on water resources carrying capacity based on water-economy-ecology concept framework and EFAST-cloud model: A case study of Henan Province China. Ecol. Indic. 143, 109392 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109392
Cheng, Z. et al. Coupling assessment for the water-economy-ecology nexus in Western China. Ecol. Indic. 154, 110648 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110648
Zhu, C. et al. Simulating the interrelationships among population, water, ecology, and economy in urban agglomerations based on a system dynamics approach. J. Clean. Prod. 439, 140813 (2024).
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140813
Zuo, Q. et al. Solutions to difficult problems caused by the complexity of human-water relationship in the Yellow River Basin: Based on the perspective of human-water relationship discipline. Water 14(18), 2868 (2022).
doi: 10.3390/w14182868
Parolari, A. J., Katul, G. G. & Porporato, A. The Doomsday Equation and 50 years beyond: New perspectives on the human-water system. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Water. 2(4), 407–414 (2015).
doi: 10.1002/wat2.1080
Wu Z, Chen X, Di D., 2023 Evaluation of Regional Water Ecological Economic System Sustainability Based on Emergy Water Ecological Footprint Theory—Taking the Yellow River Basin as an Example.
Li, D., Zuo, Q. & Zhang, Z. A new assessment method of sustainable water resources utilization considering fairness-efficiency-security: A case study of 31 provinces and cities in China. Sustain. Cities Soc. 81, 103839 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103839
Cheng, Y. et al. Revealing the heterogeneity of socio-economic impacts on resource-environmental pressure: A novel three-dimensional framework applied to the Yellow River Basin. Ecol. Indic. 166, 112419 (2024).
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112419
Vieira, P., Jorge, C. & Covas, D. Assessment of household water use efficiency using performance indices. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 116, 94–106 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.007
Rouzaneh, D., Yazdanpanah, M. & Jahromi, A. B. Evaluating micro-irrigation system performance through assessment of farmers’ satisfaction: Implications for adoption, longevity, and water use efficiency. Agric. Water Manage. 246, 106655 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106655
Zema, D. A. et al. Improvement of the irrigation performance in water users associations integrating data envelopment analysis and multi-regression models. Agric. Water Manage. 205, 38–49 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.04.032
Ibrahim, M. D., Alola, A. A. & Ferreira, D. C. A two-stage data envelopment analysis of efficiency of social-ecological systems: Inference from the sub-Saharan African countries. Ecol. Indic. 2021(123), 107381 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107381
Liang, X. et al. Evaluation for water resource system efficiency and influencing factors in western China: A two-stage network DEA-Tobit model. J. Clean. Prod. 328, 129674 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129674
Yue, Z. et al. Evaluation of sustainability in northern Xinjiang based on ecological footprint-planetary boundary system framework. Ecol. Indic. 150, 110270 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110270
Liu, J. et al. Water-related ecosystem services interactions and their natural-human activity drivers: Implications for ecological protection and restoration. J. Environ. Manage. 352, 120101 (2024).
pubmed: 38228047
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120101
Jiang, L. et al. Evaluation and prediction of the level of high-quality development: A case study of the Yellow River Basin China. Ecol. Indic. 129, 107994 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107994
Peng, Q. et al. Spatio-temporal analysis of water sustainability of cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt based on the perspectives of quantity-quality-benefit. Ecol. Indic. 160, 111909 (2024).
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111909
Zuo Qiting, Wu. et al. Methods for measuring regional water balance and imbalance degree. J. Hydraul. Eng. 55(1), 1–12 (2024).
Ibrahim, M. D. et al. Transnational resource generativity: Efficiency analysis and target setting of water, energy, land, and food nexus for OECD countries. Sci. Total Environ. 697, 134017 (2019).
pubmed: 31484086
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134017
Shi, C. et al. Spatial differentiation of agricultural water resource utilization efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt under changing environment. J. Clean. Prod. 346, 131200 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131200
Deng, G., Li, L. & Song, Y. Provincial water use efficiency measurement and factor analysis in China: Based on SBM-DEA model. Ecol. Indic. 69, 12–18 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.052
Huang, L. N. et al. Ecological footprint method in water resources assessment. Acta Ecologica Sinica 28(3), 1279–1286 (2008).
Li, D. et al. An integrated analysis framework for water resources sustainability considering fairness and decoupling based on the water resources ecological footprint model: A case study of Xinjiang China. J. Clean. Prod. 383, 135466 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135466
Świąder, M. et al. The application of ecological footprint and biocapacity for environmental carrying capacity assessment: A new approach for European cities. Environ. Sci. Policy 105, 56–74 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.12.010
Yang, Y. et al. New green development indicator of water resources system based on an improved water resources ecological footprint and its application. Ecol. Indic. 148, 110115 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110115
Su, Y. et al. Dynamic assessment and forecast of urban water ecological footprint based on exponential smoothing analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 195, 354–364 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.184
Lv, C. et al. Basin water ecological compensation interval accounting based on dual perspectives of supply and consumption: Taking Qingyi River Basin as an example. J. Clean. Prod. 385, 135610 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135610
Wu, B. et al. A social-ecological coupling model for evaluating the human-water relationship in basins within the Budyko framework. J. Hydrol. 619, 129361 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129361
Jin, S. et al. Global environmental changes slow down the pace of globalization highlighted by a new composite indicator. J. Clean. Prod. 318, 128538 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128538
Faber, J. H. & Van Wensem, J. Elaborations on the use of the ecosystem services concept for application in ecological risk assessment for soils. Sci. Total Environ. 415, 3–8 (2012).
pubmed: 21723588
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.05.059
Qin, J. et al. Assessment of water-related ecosystem services based on multi-scenario land use changes: Focusing on the Poyang Lake Basin of southern China. Ecol. Indic. 158, 111549 (2024).
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111549
Agudelo, C. A. R., Bustos, S. L. H. & Moreno, C. A. P. Modeling interactions among multiple ecosystem services. Crit. Rev. Ecol. Modell. 429, 109103 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109103
Redhead, J. W. et al. National scale evaluation of the InVEST nutrient retention model in the United Kingdom. Sci. Total Environ. 610, 666–677 (2018).
pubmed: 28826113
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.092
Benra, F. et al. Mapping water ecosystem services: Evaluating InVEST model predictions in data scarce regions. Environ. Modell. Softw. 138, 104982 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.104982
Ma, X. et al. Assessing the relative contributions, combined effects and multiscale uncertainty of future land use and climate change on water-related ecosystem services in Southwest China using a novel integrated modelling framework. Sustain. Cities Soc. 106, 105400 (2024).
doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105400
Nuñez, J. A. et al. Climate change and land cover effects on water yield in a subtropical watershed spanning the yungas-chaco transition of Argentina. J. Environ. Manag. 358, 120808 (2024).
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120808
Sun, X. et al. Analyzing spatio-temporal changes and trade-offs to support the supply of multiple ecosystem services in Beijing, China. Ecol. Indic. 94, 117–129 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.049
Wu, Y. et al. Ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies under influence of climate and land cover change in an afforested semiarid basin China. Ecol. Eng. 159, 106083 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.106083
Bi, Y. et al. Coupling relationship between urbanization and water-related ecosystem services in China’s Yangtze River economic Belt and its socio-ecological driving forces: A county-level perspective. Ecol. Indic. 146, 109871 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109871
Singh, N. K. et al. Optimizing wetland restoration to improve water quality at a regional scale. Environ. Res. Lett. 14(6), 064006 (2019).
doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab1827
Wang, Y. & Dai, E. Spatial-temporal changes in ecosystem services and the trade-off relationship in mountain regions: A case study of Hengduan Mountain region in Southwest China. J. Clean. Prod. 264, 121573 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121573
Wang, Y. et al. Spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services and their trade-offs in the Hengduan Mountain region Southwest China. Catena 207, 105632 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105632
Grizzetti, B. et al. Relationship between ecological condition and ecosystem services in European rivers, lakes and coastal waters. Sci. Total Environ. 671, 452–465 (2019).
pubmed: 30933801
pmcid: 6509285
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.155
Zhang, H. et al. Coupling analysis of environment and economy based on the changes of ecosystem service value. Ecol. Indic. 144, 109524 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109524
Zuo, Q. et al. A harmony-based approach for assessing and regulating human-water relationships: A case study of Henan province in China. Water 13(1), 32 (2020).
doi: 10.3390/w13010032
Liu, L., He, L. & Zuo, Q. Evaluating the human-water relationship over the past two decades using the SMI-P method across nine provinces along the yellow river China. Water 16(7), 916 (2024).
doi: 10.3390/w16070916
Guan, Y. et al. Characterizing the water resource-environment-ecology system harmony in Chinese cities using integrated datasets: A beautiful China perspective assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 921, 171094 (2024).
pubmed: 38387575
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171094
Malakar, K. & Lu, C. Measuring sustainability as distance to ideal position of economy, society and environment: Application to China’s provincial water resources (2004–17). J. Environ. Manag. 292, 112742 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112742
Zhong, T. et al. Relationship identification between water-energy resource utilization efficiency and ecological risk in the context of assessment-decoupling two-stage framework—A case study of Henan Province China. Water 15(19), 3377 (2023).
doi: 10.3390/w15193377
Wang, S. et al. Coupled coordination of water resources–economy–ecosystem complex in the Henan section of the Yellow River basin. Water Supply 22(12), 8835–8848 (2022).
doi: 10.2166/ws.2022.410
Zhou, X. et al. Spatial-temporal variation of economic resilience and its influencing factors under COVID-19: Evidence from Henan province, China. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 105, 104357 (2024).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104357
Yu, Y. et al. Water management for industrial development, energy conservation, and subjective attitudes: A comprehensive risk-oriented model to explore the tolerance of unbalanced allocation problem. J. Water Clim. Change 13(1), 139–157 (2022).
doi: 10.2166/wcc.2021.377
Ling, M. et al. Simulating and predicting the development trends of the water–energy–food–ecology system in Henan Province, China. Ecol. Indic. 158, 111513 (2024).
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111513
Shi, Y. et al. Forecasting and advancing water carrying capacity in Henan Province in China: Application of ‘four determinations with water’in AHP and SD modeling. Sci. Total Environ. 919, 170757 (2024).
pubmed: 38340851
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170757
Chen, Z. et al. Centralized water reuse system with multiple applications in urban areas: Lessons from China’s experience. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 117, 125–136 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.008
Karamergenova, A. & Wu, J. J. Improving water reuse in an oil refinery and avoidance of the pinch analysis trap with particular reference to the Atyrau refinery in Kazakhstan. Desalin. Water Treat. 296, 1–9 (2023).