Spinal muscle characteristics during three different types of locomotion activities among college students with idiopathic scoliosis.
Electromyography
Scoliosis
Stair climbing
Students
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Oct 2024
29 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
13
11
2023
accepted:
14
10
2024
medline:
30
10
2024
pubmed:
30
10
2024
entrez:
30
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Physical activities such as walking and climbing stairs are pervasive in human daily life. Individuals with scoliosis frequently encounter dysfunction in their muscle recruitment. Multiple studies have corroborated the presence of muscle dysfunction in individuals diagnosed with scoliosis. However, there is currently a noteworthy research gap regarding the exploration of changes in muscle characteristics and disparities from those observed in individuals without scoliosis during everyday activities, specifically stair climbing. This study aims to examine the unique patterns of muscle activity during daily life in individuals with scoliosis and distinguish the specific differences between scoliosis patients and the healthy controls. The findings of this study are significantly important for the future accurate assessment of scoliosis and the development of rehabilitation treatment plans. Case-control study. Twenty eight idiopathic scoliosis patients and twenty eight controls. Root Mean Square(RMS), Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction(MVIC)%, RMS ratio(RMS convex / RMS concave). The surface electromyography (sEMG) device used in this study was the Delsys Trigno, with a sampling frequency of 1500 Hz. It recorded the activation level, peak contraction, and average activation level of the erector spinae (at T6, T10, and L3 levels), gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, external oblique, and rectus abdominis muscles during three different types of locomotion for both the 28 individuals with idiopathic scoliosis and the 28 control participants. The movement patterns of the idiopathic scoliosis patients significantly differ from those of the normal population during level walking and ascending or descending stairs. In level walking, there is an asymmetry in the activation levels of the T6 and L3 erector spinae muscles, with lower activation on the convex side compared to the concave side. Similarly, during stair ascent, the activation of the T6 and T10 erector spinae muscles is asymmetric, with higher activation on the convex side than the concave side. Moreover, during stair descent, the activation of the T6 erector spinae muscle is asymmetric, with higher activation on the convex side than the concave side. During level walking and stair activities, idiopathic scoliosis patients exhibit pronounced abnormal movement patterns that significantly differ from those of the control group. Under different activity conditions such as level walking, ascending and descending stairs, idiopathic scoliosis patients demonstrate abnormal muscle activation in different segments of the spine. It is crucial for clinicians to prioritize the symmetry of muscle activation in the spinal region of idiopathic scoliosis patients and consider incorporating symmetry training for these muscles.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND CONTEXT
BACKGROUND
Physical activities such as walking and climbing stairs are pervasive in human daily life. Individuals with scoliosis frequently encounter dysfunction in their muscle recruitment. Multiple studies have corroborated the presence of muscle dysfunction in individuals diagnosed with scoliosis. However, there is currently a noteworthy research gap regarding the exploration of changes in muscle characteristics and disparities from those observed in individuals without scoliosis during everyday activities, specifically stair climbing.
PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to examine the unique patterns of muscle activity during daily life in individuals with scoliosis and distinguish the specific differences between scoliosis patients and the healthy controls. The findings of this study are significantly important for the future accurate assessment of scoliosis and the development of rehabilitation treatment plans.
STUDY DESIGN
METHODS
Case-control study.
SAMPLE SIZE
METHODS
Twenty eight idiopathic scoliosis patients and twenty eight controls.
OUTCOME MEASURES
METHODS
Root Mean Square(RMS), Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction(MVIC)%, RMS ratio(RMS convex / RMS concave).
METHODS
METHODS
The surface electromyography (sEMG) device used in this study was the Delsys Trigno, with a sampling frequency of 1500 Hz. It recorded the activation level, peak contraction, and average activation level of the erector spinae (at T6, T10, and L3 levels), gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, external oblique, and rectus abdominis muscles during three different types of locomotion for both the 28 individuals with idiopathic scoliosis and the 28 control participants.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The movement patterns of the idiopathic scoliosis patients significantly differ from those of the normal population during level walking and ascending or descending stairs. In level walking, there is an asymmetry in the activation levels of the T6 and L3 erector spinae muscles, with lower activation on the convex side compared to the concave side. Similarly, during stair ascent, the activation of the T6 and T10 erector spinae muscles is asymmetric, with higher activation on the convex side than the concave side. Moreover, during stair descent, the activation of the T6 erector spinae muscle is asymmetric, with higher activation on the convex side than the concave side.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
During level walking and stair activities, idiopathic scoliosis patients exhibit pronounced abnormal movement patterns that significantly differ from those of the control group. Under different activity conditions such as level walking, ascending and descending stairs, idiopathic scoliosis patients demonstrate abnormal muscle activation in different segments of the spine. It is crucial for clinicians to prioritize the symmetry of muscle activation in the spinal region of idiopathic scoliosis patients and consider incorporating symmetry training for these muscles.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39472828
doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07954-5
pii: 10.1186/s12891-024-07954-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
862Subventions
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 82205306
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Pediatr Surg Int. 2021 Dec;37(12):1755-1760
pubmed: 34510262
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2001 May;31(5):255-62
pubmed: 11352192
Gait Posture. 2011 Jun;34(2):222-6
pubmed: 21628099
Scoliosis. 2007 Jul 09;2:9
pubmed: 17620141
J Sport Rehabil. 2010 Aug;19(3):315-27
pubmed: 20811080
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Dec 8;23(1):653
pubmed: 38066469
Cell Discov. 2023 Apr 25;9(1):44
pubmed: 37185898
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2019 May;65:81-86
pubmed: 31004964
Children (Basel). 2021 Dec 10;8(12):
pubmed: 34943364
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Oct 29;21(21):
pubmed: 34770526
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1995 Jul;79(1):23-32
pubmed: 7559225
J Pain. 2010 Nov;11(11):1120-8
pubmed: 20434958
J Pediatr Orthop. 1984 Mar;4(2):195-200
pubmed: 6699161
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2016 Jul;36:52-7
pubmed: 27214246
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 2;11(1):17582
pubmed: 34475442
Scoliosis. 2012 Jan 20;7(1):3
pubmed: 22264320
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2019 Jun 30;21(3):197-205
pubmed: 32015197
Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2018 Jan 10;13:3
pubmed: 29435499
Eur Spine J. 1998;7(4):289-93
pubmed: 9765036
J Orthop Surg Res. 2010 Nov 04;5:80
pubmed: 21047435
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2014 Oct;24(5):645-51
pubmed: 25008019
Spine J. 2007 May-Jun;7(3):338-44
pubmed: 17482118
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 18;10(11):e0143124
pubmed: 26580068
Cureus. 2021 Aug 12;13(8):e17122
pubmed: 34548961
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2022 Apr;63:102640
pubmed: 35219074
Eur Spine J. 2016 Feb;25(2):385-93
pubmed: 25893334
Hum Mov Sci. 2012 Aug;31(4):880-96
pubmed: 22119422
Pol Orthop Traumatol. 2014 Jul 28;79:118-22
pubmed: 25066033
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2011 Jun;21(3):533-41
pubmed: 21377380
Asian Spine J. 2023 Oct;17(5):922-932
pubmed: 37690987
J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Nov;81:196-200
pubmed: 33222916
Knee. 2018 Jan;25(1):40-50
pubmed: 29174844
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Dec 15;33(26):2898-908
pubmed: 19092622
Front Neurol. 2020 Dec 03;11:603550
pubmed: 33424754
Int Rehabil Med. 1984;6(1):31-46
pubmed: 6610663
Scoliosis. 2015 Mar 07;10:8
pubmed: 25780381
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005 Oct;20(8):784-93
pubmed: 15975698
Spine J. 2024 Apr;24(4):692-720
pubmed: 38008187
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Aug 09;59(8):
pubmed: 37629733
Neurospine. 2023 Jun;20(2):709-724
pubmed: 37401090
Hum Mov Sci. 2018 Jun;59:112-120
pubmed: 29653340
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Apr;101(2):235-46
pubmed: 25765946
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Jan;86(1):31-6
pubmed: 15640986