Radiological evaluation of fusion patterns after Lateral Lumbar Interbody fusion with 3D-printed porous titanium cages vs. conventional titanium cages.
LLIF
fusion
instrumentation
minimally invasive spine surgery
porous titanium
subsidence
Journal
Frontiers in surgery
ISSN: 2296-875X
Titre abrégé: Front Surg
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101645127
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
10
06
2024
accepted:
30
09
2024
medline:
30
10
2024
pubmed:
30
10
2024
entrez:
30
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The assessment of segmental fusion after Lateral Lumbar Interbody fusion (LLIF) using 3D-printed porous titanium cage is still not well studied. Various criteria, such as the presence of bone bridges (BB) between adjacent vertebrae, serve as indicators for anterior fusion. However, limited radiological studies have investigated zygapophyseal joints (ZJ) status following LLIF with porous titanium cages vs. conventional titanium threaded cages. The porous design of the latest titanium intervertebral cages is thought to enhance the bone-to-implant fusion rate. This radiological study aimed to compare the fusion patterns post-LLIF using 3D-printed porous titanium cages against those using threaded titanium cages. This radiological study aimed to compare the fusion patterns after LLIF using 3D-printed porous titanium cages against those using threaded titanium cages. This retrospective, single-center radiological study involved 135 patients who underwent LLIF and posterior percutaneous screw fixation for degenerative spondylolisthesis. The study included 51 patients (Group A) with the novel porous titanium cages and 84 patients (Group B) with conventional threaded titanium cages. Inclusion criteria mandated complete radiological data and a minimum follow-up period of 24 months. The study evaluated intervertebral bone bridges (BB) for anterior fusion and zygapophyseal joints (ZJ) ankylotic degeneration, based on Pathria et al., as evidence of posterior fusion and segmental immobilization. Two years after surgery, intervertebral BB were identified in 83 segments (94.31%) in Group A and in 87 segments (88.77%) in Group B. ZJ Pathria grade I was observed in 2 segments (2.27%) of Group A and in 4 segments (4.08%) of Group B. Grade II was seen in 5 segments (5.68%) of Group A and in 6 segments (6.12%) of Group B. Posterior fusion, classified as grade III, was found in 81 segments (92.04%) of Group A and 88 segments (89.79%) of Group B. Subsidence incidence was 5.88% (3 segments) for the novel cage and 9.88% (8 segments) for the conventional cage. The architecture of porous titanium cages offers a promising solution for increasing bone ingrowth and bridging space, supporting successful spinal fusion while minimizing the risk of subsidence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39474232
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1446792
pmc: PMC11518840
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1446792Informations de copyright
© 2024 Velluto, Mundis, Scaramuzzo, Perna, Capece, Cruciani, Inverso, Borruto and Proietti.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 May 17;10:900992
pubmed: 35656196
Global Spine J. 2024 Apr;14(3):986-997
pubmed: 36202133
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Jul;19(1):110-8
pubmed: 23662890
Asian Spine J. 2019 Dec;13(6):1047-1057
pubmed: 31352720
Radiol Med. 2021 Feb;126(2):250-257
pubmed: 32654029
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2019 Dec 20;4(2):171-177
pubmed: 32405565
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1711-7
pubmed: 24510358
J Spine Surg. 2024 Mar 20;10(1):22-29
pubmed: 38567003
Eur Spine J. 2019 May;28(5):1121-1129
pubmed: 28597301
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Dec;10(4):539-546
pubmed: 29038952
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Feb 23;60(3):
pubmed: 38541104
World Neurosurg. 2022 Jun;162:e626-e634
pubmed: 35346883
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Jun;24(4):242-50
pubmed: 20844451
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Dec 15;35(26 Suppl):S361-7
pubmed: 21160401
J Biomech Eng. 2017 May 1;139(5):
pubmed: 28334320
Spine J. 2022 Jun;22(6):1028-1037
pubmed: 35017054
Radiology. 1987 Jul;164(1):227-30
pubmed: 3588910
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2022 Oct;99:105764
pubmed: 36130418
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Feb 16;18(1):115
pubmed: 36797750
Global Spine J. 2020 Apr;10(2 Suppl):17S-21S
pubmed: 32528802
Eur Spine J. 2015 May;24(5):1017-30
pubmed: 25813010
Eur Spine J. 2018 Feb;27(2):426-432
pubmed: 27771788
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 1;25(21):2808-15
pubmed: 11064527
Spine J. 2006 Jul-Aug;6(4):435-43
pubmed: 16825052
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019 Oct;10(Suppl 1):S156-S162
pubmed: 31695275