Quantitative estimation of optical properties in bilayer media within the subdiffusive regime using tilted fiber-optic probe diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, part 2: probe design, realization, and experimental validation.
Monte Carlo simulation
bilayer
diffuse reflectance
fiber optic probe
intrinsic optical properties
subdiffusive
Journal
Journal of biomedical optics
ISSN: 1560-2281
Titre abrégé: J Biomed Opt
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9605853
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2024
Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
15
05
2024
revised:
06
09
2024
accepted:
16
09
2024
medline:
30
10
2024
pubmed:
30
10
2024
entrez:
30
10
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Tissues like skin have a layered structure where each layer's optical properties vary significantly. However, traditional diffuse reflectance spectroscopy assumes a homogeneous medium, often leading to estimations that reflects the properties of neither layer. There's a clear need for probes that can precisely measure the optical properties of layered tissues. This paper aims to design a diffuse reflectance probe capable of accurately estimating the optical properties of bilayer tissues in the subdiffusive regime. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we evaluated key geometric factors-fiber placement, tilt angle, diameter, and numerical aperture-on optical property estimation, following the methodology in Part I. A robust design is proposed that balances accurate intrinsic optical property (IOP) calculations with practical experimental constraints. The designed probe, featuring eight illumination and eight detection fibers with varying spacings and tilt angles. The estimation error of the IOP calculation for bilayer phantoms is less than 20% for top layers with thicknesses between 0.2 and 1.0 mm. Building on the approach from Part I and using a precise calibration, the probe effectively quantified and distinguished the IOPs of bilayer samples, particularly those relevant to early skin pathology detection and characterization.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39474361
doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.29.10.105002
pii: 240136GR
pmc: PMC11521147
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
105002Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors.
Références
Appl Opt. 1998 Apr 1;37(10):1958-72
pubmed: 18273116
J Biomed Opt. 2006 Jul-Aug;11(4):041102
pubmed: 16965130
Anal Chim Acta. 2016 Apr 21;917:53-63
pubmed: 27026600
Phys Med Biol. 2013 Jun 7;58(11):R37-61
pubmed: 23666068
Lasers Surg Med. 2006 Aug;38(7):714-24
pubmed: 16799981
J Biomed Opt. 2014;19(10):107002
pubmed: 25349033
Phys Med Biol. 2008 Feb 21;53(4):937-51
pubmed: 18263950
Cancer. 1993 Jun 1;71(11):3737-43
pubmed: 8490924
Arch Dermatol. 2008 Apr;144(4):469-74
pubmed: 18427040
Appl Opt. 2006 Jul 1;45(19):4776-90
pubmed: 16799693
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jan 15;22(2):357-65
pubmed: 26324737
J Biomed Opt. 2005 Jul-Aug;10(4):44017
pubmed: 16178650
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jun 25;19(12):
pubmed: 31242659
J Biomed Opt. 2018 Aug;23(8):1-14
pubmed: 30152204
Appl Opt. 2008 Sep 20;47(27):4965-73
pubmed: 18806859
J Biomed Opt. 2005 Jul-Aug;10(4):44016
pubmed: 16178649
Biomed Opt Express. 2013 Dec 02;5(1):40-53
pubmed: 24466475
Appl Opt. 2005 Jul 10;44(20):4291-305
pubmed: 16045217
J Biomed Opt. 2011 Jan-Feb;16(1):011012
pubmed: 21280899
Opt Express. 2009 Oct 26;17(22):20178-90
pubmed: 19997242
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Jan;137(1):155-65
pubmed: 23225143
J Biomed Opt. 2013 Mar;18(3):037003
pubmed: 23455965
Cancer Res. 2012 Jun 1;72(11):2738-45
pubmed: 22491533