Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Vestibular Migraine Patient Assessment Tool and Handicap Inventory (VM-PATHI).

MCID Vestibular Migraine Patient Assessment Tool and Handicap Inventory minimal clinically important difference vestibular migraine

Journal

Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1097-6817
Titre abrégé: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8508176

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Oct 2024
Historique:
revised: 04 10 2024
received: 29 05 2024
accepted: 12 10 2024
medline: 30 10 2024
pubmed: 30 10 2024
entrez: 30 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To calculate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Vestibular Migraine Patient Assessment Tool and Handicap Inventory (VM-PATHI). Prospective cohort study. A single tertiary care balance and falls center. Fifty-three subjects meeting Barany Society criteria for vestibular migraine (VM) or probable VM were included and divided into 3 treatment groups. Treatment was not standardized, instead, management was decided individually between each patient and their provider. All subjects completed VM-PATHI before and after intervention. A Global Rating of Change (GRoC) questionnaire was also completed following intervention. Anchor-based methods, using a GRoC questionnaire, were utilized to estimate the MCID that produced the highest sensitivity and specificity on a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Forty-three subjects were classified as responders and 10 were classified as nonresponders. The mean VM-PATHI pretreatment score minus the posttreatment score between the responders (mean = 14, SD 13) and nonresponders (mean = 4 SD = 12) was statistically significant (mean difference = 10, 95% confidence interval, CI [1, 20], P = .03). The VM-PATHI score change cutoff that best differentiated between responders and nonresponders was a VM-PATHI change of 6. Thus, the MCID was defined as a change of 6 points (sensitivity = 72%, specificity = 70%). The area under the ROC curve was 0.89, 95% CI [0.80, 0.98], which demonstrates an excellent ability for the VM-PATHI score change to discriminate between responders and nonresponders. The average change in VM-PATHI scores was 9 points (SD 11) for those with "a little better" rating on the GRoC, 14 points (SD 14) for those with a "moderately better" rating, and 20 points (SD 13) for those with a "very much better" rating. Patients with VM are likely to demonstrate clinical improvement if their VM-PATHI score decreases by 6 or more.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39474873
doi: 10.1002/ohn.1035
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024 American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.

Références

Formeister EJ, Rizk HG, Kohn MA, Sharon JD. The epidemiology of vestibular migraine: a population‐based survey study. Otol Neurotol. 2018;39(8):1037‐1044.
Lempert T, Olesen J, Furman J, et al. Vestibular migraine: diagnostic criteria. J Vestib Res. 2012;22(4):167‐172.
Sharon JD, Krauter R, Kirk L, et al. Development and validation of VM‐PATHI: Vestibular Migraine Patient Assessment Tool and Handicap Inventory. Otol Neurotol. 2020;41(4):e494‐e500.
Kim EK, Hum M, Sharon JD. Correlating Vestibular Migraine Patient Assessment Tool and Handicap Inventory to daily dizziness symptoms. Otol Neurotol. 2023;44(10):1052‐1056.
Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Controlled Clin Trials. 1989;10(4):407‐415.
Sedaghat AR. Understanding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of patient‐reported outcome measures. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;161(4):551‐560.
Crosby RD, Kolotkin RL, Williams GR. Defining clinically meaningful change in health‐related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56(5):395‐407.
Copay AG, Subach BR, Glassman SD, Polly Jr DW, Schuler TC. Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. Spine J. 2007;7(5):541‐546.
Engel L, Beaton DE, Touma Z. Minimal clinically important difference. Rheumatic Dis Clin North Am. 2018;44(2):177‐188.
Malec JF, Ketchum JM. A Standard Method for Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Rehabilitation Measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;101(6):1090‐1094.
Hosmer Jr DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
Formeister EJ. Mindfulness‐based stress reduction for the treatment of vestibular migraine: a prospective trial. Presented at: Barany Society Meeting; May 9, 2022; Madrid, Spain.
Sharon JD. A placebo controlled, randomized clinical trial of galcanezumab for vestibular migraine: the INVESTMENT study. Presented at: Headache Cooperative of the Pacific Winter Conference; January 26, 2024; Ojai Valley, CA.
Fong E, Li C, Aslakson R, Agrawal Y. Systematic review of patient‐reported outcome measures in clinical vestibular research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(2):357‐365.
Jacobson GP, Newman CW. The development of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;116(4):424‐427.
Rizk HG, Velozo C, Shah S, Hum M, Sharon JD, Mcrackan TR. Item level psychometrics of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory in vestibular migraine and Meniere's disease. Ear Hear. 2023;45:106‐114. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000001405
Marchetti GF, Lin CC, Alghadir A, Whitney SL. Responsiveness and minimal detectable change of the dynamic gait index and functional gait index in persons with balance and vestibular disorders. J Neurologic Phys Ther. 2014;38(2):119‐124.
Wellons RD, Duhe SE, MacDowell SG, Hodge A, Oxborough S, Levitzky EE. Estimating the minimal clinically important difference for balance and gait outcome measures in individuals with vestibular disorders. J Vestibular Res. 2022;32(3):223‐233.
Dannenbaum E, Chilingarian G, Fung J. Validity and Responsiveness of the Visual Vertigo Analogue Scale. J Neurologic Phys Ther. 2019;43(2):117‐121.
Reploeg MD, Goebel JA. Migraine‐associated dizziness: patient characteristics and management options. Otol Neurotol. 2002;23(3):364‐371.
Benjamin T, Gardi A, Sharon JD. Recent developments in vestibular migraine: a narrative review. Am J Audiol. 2023;32(3S):739‐745.
United States Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. US FDA.

Auteurs

Adam Gardi (A)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA.

Maxwell Hum (M)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA.

Daniel Wong (D)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA.

Isabel Allen (I)

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA.

Jeffrey D Sharon (JD)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA.

Classifications MeSH