Efficacy of problem-solving therapy in treating late-life depression with potential cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Aged
Delirium & cognitive disorders
Depression & mood disorders
PSYCHIATRY
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Oct 2024
29 Oct 2024
Historique:
medline:
31
10
2024
pubmed:
31
10
2024
entrez:
30
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Late-life depression (LLD) is a global public health issue, often accompanied by cognitive impairments that can exacerbate the severity of depression and impair social functioning. Despite being a well-established treatment for LLD, the suitability of problem-solving therapy (PST) for individuals with LLD and varying degrees of cognitive impairments warrants further investigation. This paper presents the protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) aimed at evaluating the effectiveness and acceptability of PST for this specific demographic. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we will conduct a systematic review to synthesise existing research on PST for individuals in this demographic. We will comprehensively search multiple databases and sources, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database and APA PsycNET from inception to October 2023, without language, publication year or type restrictions. Relevant studies will be manually screened from the references. Only RCTs involving PST for LLD will be included. The primary efficacy outcome will be the standardised mean difference in total scores on continuous depression severity scales across different comparison arms. Data extraction will be conducted independently by two reviewers (CH and J-JW), and methodological rigour will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to investigate the impact of concomitant cognitive impairments and to evaluate the robustness of the findings. The meta-analysis project is expected to be ethically unproblematic and does not require approval from a research ethics committee. The results of this study will be shared through articles in scholarly peer-reviewed journals and presentations in various formats, both print and digital. CRD42023473782.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39477253
pii: bmjopen-2024-084130
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084130
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e084130Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: Our team affirms the absence of any conflicts of interest. This research protocol's drafting and execution were carried out autonomously, uninfluenced by any external peer review commissions or interventions.