Lived experiences of working-age polytrauma patients in Germany - A qualitative Analysis.

Healthcare system ICF model Major trauma Patient interviews Patients’ journey Qualitative analyses

Journal

Injury
ISSN: 1879-0267
Titre abrégé: Injury
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0226040

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 28 07 2024
revised: 17 09 2024
accepted: 30 09 2024
medline: 31 10 2024
pubmed: 31 10 2024
entrez: 30 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Survivors of a major trauma experience a range of difficulties in relation to the reduction in physical, psychosocial, and cognitive functions, which can result in a reduced health-related quality of life. This study aims to explore lived experiences of major trauma survivors in the German healthcare system. Semi-structured exploratory interviews were performed with nine major trauma survivors (18-55 years; Injury Severity Score ≥16). For exploratory analyses, an artificial intelligence-based coding software was used. Further, results were clustered by using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework (ICF). Communication was one of the major topics concerning amongst others diverting opinions between different healthcare disciplines and a general lack of information. The participants showed a high demand for a contact person. Furthermore, social support was essential during recovery for those interviewed. Social network was not only important as emotional and physical support but also for overcoming of gaps in the healthcare system. The support by employers and colleagues seemed to be beneficial for our participants in relation to returning to work. Further, psychological consequences of trauma, and that mobility is a key factor for quality of life, self-efficacy and return to work were discussed. The qualitative analyses highlight several topics such as communication, burden of sickness, support systems that the participants mentioned as important along their journey through the German healthcare system during recovery. Through the ICF model the interplay of certain components that influenced the outcome of the major trauma survivors was visualized. These results might offer a deepened understanding of modifiable components of a patient pathway in recovery process such as improvements of patient communication, provision of a contact person and others.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Survivors of a major trauma experience a range of difficulties in relation to the reduction in physical, psychosocial, and cognitive functions, which can result in a reduced health-related quality of life. This study aims to explore lived experiences of major trauma survivors in the German healthcare system.
METHODS METHODS
Semi-structured exploratory interviews were performed with nine major trauma survivors (18-55 years; Injury Severity Score ≥16). For exploratory analyses, an artificial intelligence-based coding software was used. Further, results were clustered by using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework (ICF).
RESULTS RESULTS
Communication was one of the major topics concerning amongst others diverting opinions between different healthcare disciplines and a general lack of information. The participants showed a high demand for a contact person. Furthermore, social support was essential during recovery for those interviewed. Social network was not only important as emotional and physical support but also for overcoming of gaps in the healthcare system. The support by employers and colleagues seemed to be beneficial for our participants in relation to returning to work. Further, psychological consequences of trauma, and that mobility is a key factor for quality of life, self-efficacy and return to work were discussed.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
The qualitative analyses highlight several topics such as communication, burden of sickness, support systems that the participants mentioned as important along their journey through the German healthcare system during recovery. Through the ICF model the interplay of certain components that influenced the outcome of the major trauma survivors was visualized.
IMPLICATIONS CONCLUSIONS
These results might offer a deepened understanding of modifiable components of a patient pathway in recovery process such as improvements of patient communication, provision of a contact person and others.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39477709
pii: S0020-1383(24)00667-3
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111938
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

111938

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Anne Neubert (A)

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Hospital and Medical, Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, Duesseldorf 40225, Germany.

Sebastian Hempe (S)

Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Reconstructive Surgery, Hand Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Burn Medicine, German Armed Forces Central Hospital, Rübenacher Str. 170, Koblenz 56072, Germany.

Carina Jaekel (C)

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Hospital and Medical, Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, Duesseldorf 40225, Germany.

Catharina Gaeth (C)

Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Reconstructive Surgery, Hand Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Burn Medicine, German Armed Forces Central Hospital, Rübenacher Str. 170, Koblenz 56072, Germany. Electronic address: dr.catharina.gaeth@web.de.

Christopher Spering (C)

Department of trauma surgery, orthopedics, and plastic surgery of the University medical center Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, Goettingen 37075, Germany.

Katharina Fetz (K)

Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 38, Cologne 51109, Germany; Department of Anaesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care, Cologne-Merheim medical center, university hospital of Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, Cologne 51109, Germany; Chair of Research Methodology and Statistics, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany; Institute for Emergency Medicine, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Holzkoppelweg 8-12, Kiel 24118, Germany.

Joachim Windolf (J)

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Hospital and Medical, Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, Duesseldorf 40225, Germany.

Erwin Kollig (E)

Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Reconstructive Surgery, Hand Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Burn Medicine, German Armed Forces Central Hospital, Rübenacher Str. 170, Koblenz 56072, Germany.

Dan Bieler (D)

Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Reconstructive Surgery, Hand Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Burn Medicine, German Armed Forces Central Hospital, Rübenacher Str. 170, Koblenz 56072, Germany.
Academy for Traumatology (AUC) @ German Society of Traumatology, Straße des 17, Juni 106-108, Berlin, Germany.

Classifications MeSH