Proximal tibia for alveolar augmentation and augmentative rhinoplasty-a suitable option? A retrospective clinical study on donor and recipient site morbidity.
Alveolar ridge augmentation
Augmentative rhinoplasty
Doner site morbidity
Tibia bone graft
Journal
Head & face medicine
ISSN: 1746-160X
Titre abrégé: Head Face Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245792
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Oct 2024
30 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
02
08
2024
accepted:
20
10
2024
medline:
31
10
2024
pubmed:
31
10
2024
entrez:
31
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Autologous bone grafts are essential in reconstructive oral and maxillofacial surgery, and depending on the donor site, they can be associated with specific harvesting morbidities. One of the most commonly applied bone grafts is the iliac crest bone graft, irrespective of other grafts, which might be associated with an easier surgical procedure or the possibility of harvesting them under local anaesthesia. Objective of the study is the clinical evaluation of proximal tibia bone grafts regarding their eligibility for maxillofacial bone grafting. In this retrospective study, proximal tibia bone grafts were examined with regard to associated donor and recipient site morbidity and their suitability for alveolar ridge augmentation and rhinoplasty. In total, 21 tibia grafts were included. Fifty-seven percent of the bone grafts were used for alveolar ridge reconstruction, and 43% were used for augmentative rhinoplasty. No significant complications occurred during or after harvesting, but in 14.3% of the patients, minor wound healing disorders were recorded at the donor site, and in 19% of the patients, they were recorded at the recipient site. Statistically, patient sex, age, nicotine and alcohol abuse and metabolic diseases had no significant influence on the complication rate. Graft harvesting under local anaesthesia and at summer temperatures was associated with significantly more complications at the harvesting site (p < 0.05). In cases of dental implant insertion into augmented sites, the implants (n = 31) were followed up for a median period of 40.5 months, during this time 86.7% of the implants survived. The proximal tibia is a suitable donor site for harvesting autologous bone grafts for alveolar ridge augmentation or rhinoplasty because the donor site morbidity is low, and in contrast to iliac crest bone grafts, they can be harvested under local anaesthesia, which might be advantageous for outpatient surgeries.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Autologous bone grafts are essential in reconstructive oral and maxillofacial surgery, and depending on the donor site, they can be associated with specific harvesting morbidities. One of the most commonly applied bone grafts is the iliac crest bone graft, irrespective of other grafts, which might be associated with an easier surgical procedure or the possibility of harvesting them under local anaesthesia. Objective of the study is the clinical evaluation of proximal tibia bone grafts regarding their eligibility for maxillofacial bone grafting.
METHODS
METHODS
In this retrospective study, proximal tibia bone grafts were examined with regard to associated donor and recipient site morbidity and their suitability for alveolar ridge augmentation and rhinoplasty.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In total, 21 tibia grafts were included. Fifty-seven percent of the bone grafts were used for alveolar ridge reconstruction, and 43% were used for augmentative rhinoplasty. No significant complications occurred during or after harvesting, but in 14.3% of the patients, minor wound healing disorders were recorded at the donor site, and in 19% of the patients, they were recorded at the recipient site. Statistically, patient sex, age, nicotine and alcohol abuse and metabolic diseases had no significant influence on the complication rate. Graft harvesting under local anaesthesia and at summer temperatures was associated with significantly more complications at the harvesting site (p < 0.05). In cases of dental implant insertion into augmented sites, the implants (n = 31) were followed up for a median period of 40.5 months, during this time 86.7% of the implants survived.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The proximal tibia is a suitable donor site for harvesting autologous bone grafts for alveolar ridge augmentation or rhinoplasty because the donor site morbidity is low, and in contrast to iliac crest bone grafts, they can be harvested under local anaesthesia, which might be advantageous for outpatient surgeries.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39478607
doi: 10.1186/s13005-024-00470-w
pii: 10.1186/s13005-024-00470-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
66Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Alt V, Nawab A, Seligson D. Bone grafting from the proximal tibia. J Trauma. 1999;47(3):555–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199909000-00023 .
doi: 10.1097/00005373-199909000-00023
pubmed: 10498314
Arrington ED, Smith WJ, Chambers HG, Bucknell AL, Davino NA. Complications of iliac crest bone graft harvesting. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;329):300–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199608000-00037 .
doi: 10.1097/00003086-199608000-00037
Atil F, Kocyigit ID, Suer BT, Alp YE, Yazan M, Tekin U, Tuz HH. Clinical evaluation of the use of tibial bone grafting in dentoalveolar reconstructive surgery. Med Princ Pract. 2016;25(1):72–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000440998 .
doi: 10.1159/000440998
pubmed: 26501218
Bexkens R, Ogink PT, Doornberg JN, Kerkhoffs G, Eygendaal D, Oh LS, Van Den Bekerom MPJ. Donor-site morbidity after osteochondral autologous transplantation for osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(7):2237–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4516-8 .
doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4516-8
pubmed: 28391550
pmcid: 5489608
Boehm KS, Al-Taha M, Morzycki A, Samargandi OA, Al-Youha S, Leblanc MR. Donor site morbidities of iliac crest bone graft in craniofacial surgery: a systematic review. Ann Plast Surg. 2019;83(3):352–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000001682 .
doi: 10.1097/sap.0000000000001682
pubmed: 30562201
Catone GA, Reimer BL, Mcneir D, Ray R. Tibial autogenous cancellous bone as an alternative donor site in maxillofacial surgery: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;50(12):1258–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(92)90223-m .
doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(92)90223-m
pubmed: 1333008
Chatelet M, Afota F, Savoldelli C. Review of bone graft and implant survival rate : a comparison between autogenous bone block versus guided bone regeneration. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;123(2):222–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2021.04.009 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2021.04.009
pubmed: 33930599
Chauhan DS, Guruprasad Y. Cortical tibial bone graft for nasal augmentation. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2012;11(2):186–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-011-0297-7 .
doi: 10.1007/s12663-011-0297-7
pubmed: 23730067
Chen YC, Chen CH, Chen PL, Huang IY, Shen YS, Chen CM. Donor site morbidity after harvesting of proximal tibia bone. Head Neck. 2006;28(6):496–500. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.20452 .
doi: 10.1002/hed.20452
pubmed: 16673417
Eliasen M, Grønkjær M, Skov-Ettrup LS, Mikkelsen SS, Becker U, Tolstrup JS, Flensborg-Madsen T. Preoperative alcohol consumption and postoperative complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2013;258(6):930–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182988d59 .
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182988d59
pubmed: 23732268
Finkemeier CG. Bone-grafting and bone-graft substitutes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(3):454–64. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200203000-00020 .
doi: 10.2106/00004623-200203000-00020
pubmed: 11886919
French D, Grandin HM, Ofec R. Retrospective cohort study of 4,591 dental implants: analysis of risk indicators for bone loss and prevalence of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. J Periodontol. 2019;90(7):691–700. https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.18-0236 .
doi: 10.1002/jper.18-0236
pubmed: 30644101
pmcid: 6849729
Frohberg U, Mazock JB. A review of morbidity associated with bone harvest from the proximal tibial metaphysis. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2005;9(2):63–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-005-0602-z .
doi: 10.1007/s10006-005-0602-z
pubmed: 15711990
García-Díez E, Guisantes E, Fontdevila J, Raigosa M, Serra-Renom JM. Cortical tibial bone graft for nasal augmentation: donor site short scar. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62(6):747–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2007.08.027 .
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.08.027
pubmed: 18289951
Guo S, Dipietro LA. Factors affecting wound healing. J Dent Res. 2010;89(3):219–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034509359125 .
doi: 10.1177/0022034509359125
pubmed: 20139336
pmcid: 2903966
Heinze G, Schemper M. A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Stat Med. 2002;21(16):2409–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1047 .
doi: 10.1002/sim.1047
pubmed: 12210625
Hughes CW, Revington PJ. The proximal tibia donor site in cleft alveolar bone grafting: experience of 75 consecutive cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2002;30(1):12–6. https://doi.org/10.1054/jcms.2001.0268 . discussion 17.
doi: 10.1054/jcms.2001.0268
pubmed: 12064877
Ilankovan V, Stronczek M, Telfer M, Peterson LJ, Stassen LF, Ward-Booth P. A prospective study of trephined bone grafts of the tibial shaft and iliac crest. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;36(6):434–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0266-4356(98)90459-4 .
doi: 10.1016/s0266-4356(98)90459-4
pubmed: 9881785
Jakse N, Seibert FJ, Lorenzoni M, Eskici A, Pertl C. A modified technique of harvesting tibial cancellous bone and its use for sinus grafting. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12(5):488–94. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120509.x .
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120509.x
pubmed: 11564109
Katz MS, Ooms M, Heitzer M, Peters F, Winnand P, Kniha K, Möhlhenrich SC, Hölzle F, Knobe M, Modabber A. Postoperative morbidity and complications in elderly patients after harvesting of iliac crest bone grafts. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021;57(8): 759. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57080759 .
doi: 10.3390/medicina57080759
pubmed: 34440965
Khan SN, Cammisa FP Jr, Sandhu HS, Diwan AD, Girardi FP, Lane JM. The biology of bone grafting. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13(1):77–86.
doi: 10.5435/00124635-200501000-00010
pubmed: 15712985
Kirmeier R, Payer M, Lorenzoni M, Wegscheider WA, Seibert FJ, Jakse N. Harvesting of cancellous bone from the proximal tibia under local anesthesia: donor site morbidity and patient experience. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(11):2235–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.11.038 .
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.11.038
pubmed: 17954319
Ko KI, Sculean A, Graves DT. Diabetic wound healing in soft and hard oral tissues. Transl Res. 2021;236:72–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2021.05.001 .
doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2021.05.001
pubmed: 33992825
pmcid: 8554709
Lee CY. An in-office technique for harvesting tibial bone: outcomes in 8 patients. J Oral Implantol. 2003;29(4):181–4. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2003)029%3c0181:Aitfht%3e2.3.Co;2 .
doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2003)029<0181:Aitfht>2.3.Co;2
pubmed: 12964798
Levin L, Herzberg R, Dolev E, Schwartz-Arad D. Smoking and complications of onlay bone grafts and sinus lift operations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(3):369–73.
pubmed: 15214220
Maiorana C, Poli PP, Mascellaro A, Ferrario S, Beretta M. Dental implants placed in resorbed alveolar ridges reconstructed with iliac crest autogenous onlay grafts: a 26-year median follow-up retrospective study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019;47(5):805–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2019.02.002 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.02.002
pubmed: 30797661
Malara P, Von Krockow N, Niedzielska I, Malara B. Evaluation of the proximal tibia as a donor site of cancellous bone for intraoral grafting procedures-a retrospective study. J Clin Med. 2022;11(6): 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11061493 .
doi: 10.3390/jcm11061493
pubmed: 35329821
pmcid: 8953495
Mckenna GJ, Gjengedal H, Harkin J, Holland N, Moore C, Srinivasan M. Effect of autogenous bone graft site on dental implant survival and donor site complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2022;22(3): 101731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101731 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101731
pubmed: 36162883
Miceli ALC, Pereira LC, Torres TDS, Calasans-Maia MD, Louro RS. Mandibular reconstruction with lateral tibial bone graft: an excellent option for oral and maxillofacial surgery. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2017;10(4):292–8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1593475 .
doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1593475
pubmed: 29109841
Mustapha A D, Salame Z, Chrcanovic B R (2021) Smoking and Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicina (Kaunas) 58(1), https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58010039
Myeroff C, Archdeacon M. Autogenous bone graft: donor sites and techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(23):2227–36. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.J.01513 .
doi: 10.2106/jbjs.J.01513
pubmed: 22159859
O’Keeffe RM Jr, Riemer BL, Butterfield SL. Harvesting of autogenous cancellous bone graft from the proximal tibial metaphysis. A review of 230 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 1991;5(4):469–74. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199112000-00014 .
doi: 10.1097/00005131-199112000-00014
pubmed: 1762010
Vanryckeghem V, Vandeputte G, Heylen S, Somville J. Remodeling of the proximal tibia subsequent to bone graft harvest: postoperative CT study. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(7):795–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100715573747 .
doi: 10.1177/1071100715573747
pubmed: 25736323
Vura N, Gaddipati R, Ramisetty S, Thumu SK, Bhukya L. The use of tibial autogenous cancellous bone for late secondary alveolar bone grafting in cleft patients: a prospective study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2021;20(2):276–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-020-01350-x .
doi: 10.1007/s12663-020-01350-x
pubmed: 33927498
Wang K, Almeida LE, Olsson AB. Volume analysis of the proximal tibial metaphysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(12):2425–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.04.009 .
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.04.009
pubmed: 18022464
Witsenburg B. The reconstruction of anterior residual bone defects in patients with cleft lip, alveolus and palate. a review. J Maxillofac Surg. 1985;13(5):197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-0503(85)80048-5 .
doi: 10.1016/s0301-0503(85)80048-5
pubmed: 3903014
Younger EM, Chapman MW. Morbidity at bone graft donor sites. J Orthop Trauma. 1989;3(3):192–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-198909000-00002 .
doi: 10.1097/00005131-198909000-00002
pubmed: 2809818