Plastic Surgeons and Portraits Before the Invention of Photography.
Journal
The Journal of craniofacial surgery
ISSN: 1536-3732
Titre abrégé: J Craniofac Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010410
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Oct 2024
29 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
30
09
2024
accepted:
07
10
2024
medline:
31
10
2024
pubmed:
31
10
2024
entrez:
31
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The aim of this paper is to review portraits from the Renaissance to the Romantic eras, created before the invention of photography, and to discuss their usefulness to plastic surgeons. Before photography and film were invented, portraits played a critical role in documenting individuals, conveying power, and immortalizing people's appearance and identity. Portraits were not merely simple representations of a person's physical appearance; they played a crucial role in conveying the subject's inner qualities and social position, as well as the cultural values of the era. Artists often idealized or embellished certain features to align with the cultural and aesthetic ideals of their time. Portraits of the Renaissance to Romantic eras could have a significant impact on plastic surgeons' understanding of beauty and aesthetics. A plastic surgeon drawing on Renaissance ideals might prioritize symmetry and balanced facial features, which continue to be regarded as attractive in contemporary beauty standards. Beauty standards during these times favored curvaceous and lively figures, potentially inspiring modern plastic surgeons to focus on creating more dramatic or unique appearances. A plastic surgeon inspired by Romantic art might value uniqueness and avoid rigid beauty standards, focusing instead on enhancing a person's natural traits rather than conforming to a singular "ideal" appearance. Plastic surgeons could gain a richer, more classical perspective on aesthetics by studying historical art, potentially leading to more personalized and balanced outcomes. However, integrating these classical ideals into modern practice must also consider the diverse and varying definitions of beauty prevalent in today's multicultural society.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39480182
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000010833
pii: 00001665-990000000-02098
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The author reports no conflicts of interest.
Références
Wheeler DR. Art, artificial intelligence, and aesthetics in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021;148:529e–530ee
Weber M. The Methodology of the social sciences. Translated by Shils EA, Finch HA (1st ed.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press; 1949
Griffin S. The Book of the Courtesans: A Catalogue of Their Virtues. New York City: Crown; 2002
Jackson LA. Physical Attractiveness: A Sociocultural Perspective. In: Cash TF, Pruzinsky T, Eds. Body image: a handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice. 1st ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2002:13–21
Gonzalez MA, Bartolena S. Women in Art (Les Femmes dans L’art). Vanves, Paris: Hazan; 2010
Romm S. The Changing Face of Beauty. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Inc; 1992
Kim JH. The ideal beauty of the face per ages appeared in portraits. J Korean Soc Cosmetol 2019;25:609–619
Jung SG, Kim H, Hwang K, et al. What did the ideal beauty of the 15th century look like? An anthropometric analysis of Botticelli portraits. J Craniofac Surg 2024;35:2075–2077.
Reif W. Renaissance women: picture perfect. Lancet 2001;358:2003