Association between tumor deposits and liver and lung metastases at diagnosis of colorectal cancer: A SEER-based analysis.


Journal

Surgery
ISSN: 1532-7361
Titre abrégé: Surgery
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0417347

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 30 07 2024
revised: 13 09 2024
accepted: 02 10 2024
medline: 1 11 2024
pubmed: 1 11 2024
entrez: 31 10 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Tumor deposits are a unique histologic feature of colorectal cancer that is associated with adverse survival outcomes. The present study aimed to assess the association between tumor deposits and liver and lung metastases and to describe the characteristics of colorectal cancer associated with tumor deposits. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, End Results (SEER) database was screened between 2010 and 2020 for patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma who underwent radical resection with data on tumor deposits. The primary outcome of the study was liver and lung metastases. The secondary outcome was the characteristics of patients with tumor deposits. A total of 205,294 patients (52% male, mean age 66.5 years) were included in the study. Tumor deposits were detected in 20,059 (9.7%) patients. Patients with tumor deposits were younger and presented more often with larger tumors, T3/T4 tumors, N+ tumors, stage IV disease, left-sided and rectal cancers, signet-ring cell carcinomas, high-grade adenocarcinomas, and perineural invasion. Multivariable binary regression analyses showed that tumor deposits were associated with 72% higher odds of liver metastases (odds ratio 1.72, 95% confidence interval 1.62-1.82, P < .001) and 68% higher odds of lung metastases (1.68, 1.51-1.86, P < .001). The odds of liver metastases increased by 3% (odds ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.04, P < .001) and the odds of lung metastases increased by 2% (1.02, 1.01-1.03, P < .001) for each tumor deposit detected. Tumor deposit-positive colorectal cancers were larger, more often on the left side or in the rectum and presented with more advanced disease and unfavorable histology than tumor deposit-negative cancers. Tumor deposits were independently associated with 72% and 68% higher odds of liver and lung metastases, respectively.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Tumor deposits are a unique histologic feature of colorectal cancer that is associated with adverse survival outcomes. The present study aimed to assess the association between tumor deposits and liver and lung metastases and to describe the characteristics of colorectal cancer associated with tumor deposits.
METHODS METHODS
The Surveillance, Epidemiology, End Results (SEER) database was screened between 2010 and 2020 for patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma who underwent radical resection with data on tumor deposits. The primary outcome of the study was liver and lung metastases. The secondary outcome was the characteristics of patients with tumor deposits.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 205,294 patients (52% male, mean age 66.5 years) were included in the study. Tumor deposits were detected in 20,059 (9.7%) patients. Patients with tumor deposits were younger and presented more often with larger tumors, T3/T4 tumors, N+ tumors, stage IV disease, left-sided and rectal cancers, signet-ring cell carcinomas, high-grade adenocarcinomas, and perineural invasion. Multivariable binary regression analyses showed that tumor deposits were associated with 72% higher odds of liver metastases (odds ratio 1.72, 95% confidence interval 1.62-1.82, P < .001) and 68% higher odds of lung metastases (1.68, 1.51-1.86, P < .001). The odds of liver metastases increased by 3% (odds ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.04, P < .001) and the odds of lung metastases increased by 2% (1.02, 1.01-1.03, P < .001) for each tumor deposit detected.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Tumor deposit-positive colorectal cancers were larger, more often on the left side or in the rectum and presented with more advanced disease and unfavorable histology than tumor deposit-negative cancers. Tumor deposits were independently associated with 72% and 68% higher odds of liver and lung metastases, respectively.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39482114
pii: S0039-6060(24)00841-9
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.001
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of Interest/Disclosure Dr Wexner is a consultant for Baxter, Becton, Dickinson and Co, Glaxo Smith Kline, Intuitive Surgical, Livsmed, Medtronic, OstomyCure, Stryker, Takeda, and Virtual Ports; is a member of the data safety monitoring board of JSR/WCG/ACI (chair), Polypoid (chair), and Boomerang; and receives royalties from Intuitive Surgical, Karl Storz Endoscopy America Inc, and Unique Surgical Solutions, LLC. Dr Emile is a consultant for Becton, Dickinson and Company.

Auteurs

Sameh Hany Emile (SH)

Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL; Colorectal Surgery Unit, General Surgery Department, Mansoura University Hospitals, Mansoura, Egypt. Electronic address: https://www.twitter.com/dr_samehhany81.

Mona Hany Emile (MH)

Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

Zoe Garoufalia (Z)

Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL. Electronic address: https://www.twitter.com/zgaroufalia.

Justin Dourado (J)

Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL. Electronic address: https://www.twitter.com/DouradoJMD.

Steven D Wexner (SD)

Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL. Electronic address: wexners@ccf.org.

Classifications MeSH