Assessment of first-touch skills in robotic surgical training using hi-Sim and the hinotori surgical robot system among surgeons and novices.
Robot-assisted surgery
Robotic training
da Vinci
hi-Sim
hinotori
Journal
Langenbeck's archives of surgery
ISSN: 1435-2451
Titre abrégé: Langenbecks Arch Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9808285
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Nov 2024
01 Nov 2024
Historique:
received:
15
09
2024
accepted:
15
10
2024
medline:
1
11
2024
pubmed:
1
11
2024
entrez:
1
11
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Surgeons' adaptability to robotic manipulation remains underexplored. This study evaluated the participants' first-touch robotic training skills using the hinotori surgical robot system and its simulator (hi-Sim) to assess adaptability. We enrolled 11 robotic surgeons (RS), 13 laparoscopic surgeons (LS), and 15 novices (N). After tutorial and training, participants performed pegboard tasks, camera and clutch operations, energizing operations, and suture sponge tasks on hi-Sim. They also completed a suture ligation task using the hinotori surgical robot system on a suture simulator. Median scores and task completion times were compared. Pegboard task scores were 95.0%, 92.0%, and 91.5% for the RS, LS, and N groups, respectively, with differences between the RS group and LS and N groups. Camera and clutch operation scores were 93.1%, 49.7%, and 89.1%, respectively, showing differences between the RS group and LS and N groups. Energizing operation scores were 90.9%, 85.2%, and 95.0%, respectively, with a significant difference between the LS and N groups. Suture sponge task scores were 90.6%, 43.1%, and 46.2%, respectively, with differences between the RS group and LS and N groups. For the suture ligation task, completion times were 368 s, 666 s, and 1095 s, respectively, indicating differences among groups. Suture scores were 12, 10, and 7 points, respectively, with differences between the RS and N groups. First-touch simulator-based robotic skills were partially influenced by prior robotic surgical experience, while suturing skills were affected by overall surgical experience. Thus, robotic training programs should be tailored to individual adaptability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39482467
doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03514-6
pii: 10.1007/s00423-024-03514-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
332Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Kinross JM, Mason SE, Mylonas G et al (2020) Next-generation robotics in gastrointestinal surgery. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 17:430–440
doi: 10.1038/s41575-020-0290-z
pubmed: 32269329
Moglia A, Ferrari V, Morelli L et al (2016) A systematic review of virtual reality simulators for Robot-assisted surgery. Eur Urol 69:1065–1080
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021
pubmed: 26433570
Bric JD, Lumbard DC, Frelich MJ et al (2016) Current state of virtual reality simulation in robotic surgery training: a review. Surg Endosc 30:2169–2178
doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4517-y
pubmed: 26304107
Nakauchi M, Suda K, Nakamura K et al (2022) Establishment of a new practical telesurgical platform using the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System: a preclinical study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 407:3783–3791
doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02710-6
pubmed: 36239792
pmcid: 9562055
Hinata N, Yamaguchi R, Kusuhara Y et al (2022) Hinotori Surgical Robot System, a novel robot-assisted surgical platform: preclinical and clinical evaluation. Int J Urol 29:1213–1220
doi: 10.1111/iju.14973
pubmed: 35851692
Motoyama D, Matsushita Y, Watanabe H et al (2023) Robot-assisted adrenalectomy using a hinotori surgical robot system: report of first series of six cases. Asian J Endosc Surg 16:489–495
doi: 10.1111/ases.13212
pubmed: 37231618
Kohjimoto Y, Yamashita S, Iwagami S et al (2024) hinotori™ vs. Da Vinci
doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01877-y
pubmed: 38498237
Behera K, McKenna M, Smith L et al (2024) Transferring laparoscopic skills to robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review. J Robot Surg 18:11
doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01757-x
pubmed: 38214801
Uemura M, Yamashita M, Tomikawa M et al (2015) Objective assessment of the suture ligature method for the laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis model using a new computerized system. Surg Endosc 29:444–452
doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3681-9
pubmed: 25005015
Teishima J, Hattori M, Inoue S et al (2012) Impact of laparoscopic experience on the proficiency gain of urologic surgeons in robot-assisted surgery. J Endourol 26:1635–1638
doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0308
pubmed: 22873694
Yoo BE, Kim J, Cho JS et al (2015) Impact of laparoscopic experience on virtual robotic simulator dexterity. J Minim Access Surg 11:68–71
doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.147696
pubmed: 25598602
pmcid: 4290122
Pimentel M, Cabral RD, Costa MM et al (2018) Does previous laparoscopic experience influence basic robotic surgical skills? J Surg Educ 75:1075–1081
doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.11.005
pubmed: 29191757
Kowalewski KF, Schmidt MW, Proctor T et al (2018) Skills in minimally invasive and open surgery show limited transferability to robotic surgery: results from a prospective study. Surg Endosc 32:1656–1667
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6109-0
pubmed: 29435749
Moglia A, Ferrari V, Melfi F et al (2018) Performances on simulator and Da VINCI robot on subjects with and without surgical background. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 27:309–314
doi: 10.1080/13645706.2017.1365729
pubmed: 28817346
Mehta A, Patel S, Robison W et al (2018) Can teenage novel users perform as well as general surgery residents upon initial exposure to a robotic surgical system simulator? J Robot Surg 12:165–171
doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0715-z
pubmed: 28585104
Obek C, Hubka M, Porter M et al (2005) Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic skill acquisition: implications for training. J Endourol 19:1098–1103
doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.1098
pubmed: 16283847
Davila DG, Helm MC, Frelich MJ et al (2018) Robotic skills can be aided by laparoscopic training. Surg Endosc 32:2683–2688
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5963-5
pubmed: 29214515