Vision rehabilitation workforce in Italy: a country-level analysis.
Healthcare
Low vision
Vision rehabilitation center
Workers
Workforce
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 Oct 2024
31 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
07
11
2023
accepted:
16
10
2024
medline:
1
11
2024
pubmed:
1
11
2024
entrez:
1
11
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Research and monitoring of human resources available for vision rehabilitation services has been a neglected area of work in the past. This study aims to offer an overview of the vision rehabilitation workforce available in Italy, in order to profile the distribution and number of human resources for vision rehabilitation. Data on the available vision rehabilitation professionals were collected from the yearly report on the state of implementation of policies relating to the prevention of blindness, education and vision rehabilitation, according to a law which was passed by the Italian Ministry of Health, Department of Health Prevention. The report presents a review of all professional workers dealing with low vision rehabilitation centers in Italy between January 2005 and December 2019. Data on the distribution and type of services of government-supported low vision centers across the country were also obtained and examined. Of the 289 low vision rehabilitation workers in 2019, 28% were ophthalmologists, 31% orthoptists, 19% psychologists, 17% nurses and 5% social workers. The health workforce densities across the Italian regions ranged from 1.62 to 0.12 per 100.000. The density of vision rehabilitation workers showed a no growing trend from 2006 to 2015. During the study period, it was found a weak but statistically significant association of workforce density with the number of government-supported low vision centers across the Italian territory (r A critical review has identified the following national situation: need-based shortages of workers in the vision rehabilitation service sector, as well as deficiencies in data sources. Based on our results, we would recommend increasing the development of human resources trained and dedicated to vision rehabilitation and improve data collection and analysis; provide structural enhancements, across all service levels. These considerations may contribute to the enhancement of policy decisions in order to guarantee an adequate vision rehabilitation workforce and meet national rehabilitation needs. Furthermore, this analysis should be used as a lesson learned by other countries, as low-income ones, in order to develop vision rehabilitation services.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Research and monitoring of human resources available for vision rehabilitation services has been a neglected area of work in the past. This study aims to offer an overview of the vision rehabilitation workforce available in Italy, in order to profile the distribution and number of human resources for vision rehabilitation.
METHODS
METHODS
Data on the available vision rehabilitation professionals were collected from the yearly report on the state of implementation of policies relating to the prevention of blindness, education and vision rehabilitation, according to a law which was passed by the Italian Ministry of Health, Department of Health Prevention. The report presents a review of all professional workers dealing with low vision rehabilitation centers in Italy between January 2005 and December 2019. Data on the distribution and type of services of government-supported low vision centers across the country were also obtained and examined.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of the 289 low vision rehabilitation workers in 2019, 28% were ophthalmologists, 31% orthoptists, 19% psychologists, 17% nurses and 5% social workers. The health workforce densities across the Italian regions ranged from 1.62 to 0.12 per 100.000. The density of vision rehabilitation workers showed a no growing trend from 2006 to 2015. During the study period, it was found a weak but statistically significant association of workforce density with the number of government-supported low vision centers across the Italian territory (r
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
A critical review has identified the following national situation: need-based shortages of workers in the vision rehabilitation service sector, as well as deficiencies in data sources. Based on our results, we would recommend increasing the development of human resources trained and dedicated to vision rehabilitation and improve data collection and analysis; provide structural enhancements, across all service levels. These considerations may contribute to the enhancement of policy decisions in order to guarantee an adequate vision rehabilitation workforce and meet national rehabilitation needs. Furthermore, this analysis should be used as a lesson learned by other countries, as low-income ones, in order to develop vision rehabilitation services.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39482692
doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11776-5
pii: 10.1186/s12913-024-11776-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1323Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Skempes D, Stucki G, Bickenbach J. Health related rehabilitation and human rights: analyzing states’ obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:163–73.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.07.410
pubmed: 25130185
Bourne RRA, Flaxman SR, Braithwaite T, Cicinelli MV, Das A, Jonas JB, et al. Vision Loss Expert Group, “Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(9):e888-97.
doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30293-0
pubmed: 28779882
International Standards for Vision Rehabilitation: Report of the International Consensus Conference, 9–12 December 2015
World Health Organization. World report on disability. Geneve: WHO; 2011.
Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2163–96.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61729-2
pubmed: 23245607
pmcid: 6350784
Prince MJ, Wu F, Guo Y, Gutierrez Robledo LM, O’Donnell M, Sullivan R, Yusuf S. The burden of disease in older people and implications for health policy and practice. Lancet. 2015;385:549–62.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61347-7
pubmed: 25468153
McDonald KE, Raymaker DM. Paradigm shifts in disability and health: toward more ethical public health research. Am J Public Health. 2013;103:2165–73.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301286
pubmed: 24134380
pmcid: 3828957
Iezzoni LI. Policy concerns raised by the growing U.S. population aging with disability. Disabil Health J. 2014;7((1 Suppl)):S64-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2013.06.004
pubmed: 24456688
Rimmer JH, Chen MD, Hsieh K. A conceptual model for identifying, preventing, and managing secondary conditions in people with disabilities. Phys Ther. 2011;91:1728–39.
doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100410
pubmed: 22003160
Jesus TS, Hoenig H. Post-acute rehabilitation quality of care: toward a shared conceptual framework. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:960–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.12.007
pubmed: 25542676
Zimbelman JL, Juraschek SP, Zhang X, Lin VW. Physical therapy workforce in the United States: forecasting nationwide shortages. PM R. 2010;2:1021–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.06.015
pubmed: 21093838
Wilson RD, Lewis SA, Murray PK. Trends in the rehabilitation therapist workforce in underserved areas: 1980–2000. J Rural Health. 2009;25(1):26–32.
doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00195.x
pubmed: 19166558
World Health Organization (WHO). A universal truth: no health without a work force. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
V2020. Global Human Resource Development Assessment for Comprehensive Eye Care. Vision2020 Human Resources Development Working Group, Pakistan Institute of Community Ophthalmology; 2006. http://www.iapb.org/sites/iapb.org/files/Global_HR_Development_Assessment.pdf .
V2020. Global Initiative for the Elimination of Avoidable Blindness: Action Plan 2006 to 2011. WHO; 2007. http://www.who.int/blindness/Vision2020_report.pdf .
WHO. Universal Eye Health: A Global Action Plan 2014–2019. World Health Organization; 2013. http://www.who.int/blindness/actionplan/en/ .
WHO. Global Initiative for the Elimination of Avoidable Blindness. World Health Organization; 1997. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1997/WHO_PBL_97.61_Rev.1.pdf .
WHA59. Prevention of Avoidable Blindness and Visual Impairment: Report by the Secretaria. World Health Assembly 59th session, provisional agenda 11.7; 2006. http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/21095 .
World Health Organization. World report on vision. Geneve: WHO; 2019.
Conto Annuale ragioneria dello stato. Disponibile presso: https://www.rgs.mef.gov.it/VERSIONEI/e_government/amministrazioni_pubbliche/personale_delle_pa/conto_annuale/ .
Hyo Geun Choi, Min Joung Lee, Sang-Mok Lee. Visual impairment and risk of depression: A longitudinal follow-up study using a national sample cohort. Sci Rep. 2018;8:2083.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20374-5
Hodge S, Barr W, Bowen L, Leeven M, Knox PC. Exploring the role of an emotional support and counselling service for people with visual impairments. Br J Vis Impair. 2013;31:5–19.
doi: 10.1177/0264619612465168
Horowitz A, Reinhardt JP, Kennedy GJ. Major and subthreshold depression among older adults seeking vision rehabilitation services. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005;13:180–7.
doi: 10.1097/00019442-200503000-00002
pubmed: 15728748
Rovner BW, Casten RJ, Massof RW, Leiby BE, Tasman WS, Wills E. Psychological and cognitive determinants of vision function in age-related macular degeneration. ArchOphthalmol. 2011;129(7):885–90.
Horowitz A, Reinhardt J. Adequacy of the mental health system in meeting the needs of adults who are visually impaired. J Vis Impair Blind. 2006;100((special suppl)):871–4.
doi: 10.1177/0145482X0610001S13
Tasman W, Rovner BW. Age-related macular degeneration: treating the whole patient. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(4):648–9.
doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.4.648
pubmed: 15078685
Dreer LE, Elliott TR, Berry J, Fletcher DC, Swanson M, McNeal JC. Cognitive appraisals, distress and disability among persons in low vision rehabilitation. Br J Health Psychol. 2008;13(pt 3):449–61.
doi: 10.1348/135910707X209835
pubmed: 17535505
World Health Organization, International vision rehabilitation standards, WHO. 2022. ISBN: 978-88-31256-39-1.
World Health Organization, World report on vision. WHO. 2019. ISBN: 9789241516570.
Borg J, Lindström A, Larsson S. Assistive technology in developing countries: national and international responsibilities to implement the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Lancet. 2009;374:1863–5.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61872-9
pubmed: 19944867
World Health Organization. Concept paper: WHO guidelines on health- related rehabilitation (rehabilitation guidelines). Geneve: WHO; 2012.
Durham J, Brolan CE, Mukandi B. The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: a foundation for ethical disability and health research in developing countries. Am J Public Health. 2014;104:2037–43.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302006
pubmed: 25211760
pmcid: 4202975
World health Organization. Working together for health: the world health report 2006. Geneva: World health organization; 2006.
Boninger JW, Gans BM, Chan L. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: potential effects on physical medicine and rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:929–34.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.03.014
pubmed: 22459177
pmcid: 3508768
Iezzoni LI, Frakt AB, Pizer SD. Uninsured persons with disability confront substantial barriers to health care services. Disabil Health J. 2011;4:238–44.
doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2011.06.001
pubmed: 22014671
Miller NA, Kirk A, Kaiser MJ, Glos L. The relation between health insurance and health care disparities among adults with disabilities. Am J Public Health. 2014;104:e85-93.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301478
pubmed: 24328621
pmcid: 3953783
Mitra S, Findley PA, Sambamoorthi U. Health care expenditures of living with a disability: total expenditures, out-of-pocket expenses, and burden, 1996 to 2004. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:1532–40.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.02.020
pubmed: 19735781
Chen L, Evans T, Anand S, et al. Human resources for health: overcoming the crisis. Lancet. 2004;364(9449):1984–90.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17482-5
pubmed: 15567015
WHO. Global strategy on human resources for health: workforce. 2030. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241511131 .
Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM. Hospital staffing, organization, and quality of care: cross-national findings. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002;14:5–13.
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/14.1.5
pubmed: 11871630
Anand S, Barnighausen T. Human resources and health outcomes: cross- country econometric study. Lancet. 2004;364:1603–9.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17313-3
pubmed: 15519630
Joint Learning Initiative. Human resources for health: overcoming the crisis. Cambridge: Global Equity Initiative; 2004.
Speybroeck N, Dal Poz MR, Evans DB. Reassessing the relationship between human resources for health, intervention coverage and health outcomes. Background paper prepared for the world health report 2006. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.