Pulmonary Atelectasis After Sedation With Propofol vs Propofol-Ketamine for Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Humans
Ketamine
/ adverse effects
Propofol
/ adverse effects
Pulmonary Atelectasis
/ diagnostic imaging
Female
Male
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ methods
Child, Preschool
Child
Double-Blind Method
Hypnotics and Sedatives
/ adverse effects
Deep Sedation
/ adverse effects
Anesthetics, Intravenous
/ adverse effects
Anesthetics, Dissociative
/ adverse effects
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Nov 2024
04 Nov 2024
Historique:
medline:
1
11
2024
pubmed:
1
11
2024
entrez:
1
11
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Little is known about the impact of different anesthetic agents used for routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sedation on pulmonary function in children. To compare the incidence of pulmonary atelectasis after MRI sedation with propofol vs propofol-ketamine. This double-masked randomized clinical trial screened 117 consecutive pediatric patients aged 3 to 12 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I to II undergoing elective MRI under deep sedation from November 2, 2022, to April 28, 2023, at a tertiary referral center. Four patients met the exclusion criteria, and 5 patients refused to participate. The participants and outcome assessors were masked to the group allocation. During the MRI, the propofol group received 0.2 mL/kg of 1% propofol and 2 mL of 0.9% saline followed by a continuous infusion of propofol (200 μg/kg/min) and 0.9% saline (0.04 mL/kg/min). The propofol-ketamine group received 0.2 mL/kg of 0.5% propofol and 1 mg/kg of ketamine followed by a continuous infusion of propofol (100 μg/kg/min) and ketamine (20 μg/kg/min). The incidence of atelectasis assessed by lung ultrasonography examination. A total of 107 children (median [IQR] age, 5 [4-6] years; 62 male [57.9%]), with 54 in the propofol group and 53 in the propofol-ketamine group, were analyzed in this study. Notably, 48 (88.9%) and 31 (58.5%) patients had atelectasis in the propofol and propofol-ketamine groups, respectively (relative risk, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-0.8; P < .001). The incidence of desaturation and interruption of the MRI due to airway intervention or spontaneous movement did not significantly differ between the groups. The propofol-ketamine group showed a faster emergence time than the propofol group (15 [9-23] vs 25 [22-27] minutes in the propofol-ketamine vs propofol group; median difference in time, 9.0 minutes; 95% CI, 6.0-12.0 minutes; P < .001). No patient was withdrawn from the trial due to adverse effects. In this randomized clinical trial, the propofol-ketamine combination reduced sedation-induced atelectasis while allowing for faster emergence compared with propofol alone. cris.nih.go.kr Identifier: KCT0007699.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39485355
pii: 2825749
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.33029
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ketamine
690G0D6V8H
Propofol
YI7VU623SF
Hypnotics and Sedatives
0
Anesthetics, Intravenous
0
Anesthetics, Dissociative
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Comparative Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM