Insights from qualitative and bifurcation analysis of COVID-19 vaccination model in Bangladesh.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
11
01
2024
accepted:
13
10
2024
medline:
2
11
2024
pubmed:
2
11
2024
entrez:
1
11
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The unprecedented global impact of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has necessitated a comprehensive understanding of its transmission dynamics and control measures. In this study, we present a detailed analysis of a COVID-19 vaccination model tailored to the context of Bangladesh, incorporating dual-dose vaccination strategies. By employing qualitative and bifurcation analysis techniques, we investigate the equilibrium points, effective reproduction number (R0), and critical thresholds that influence the prevalence and control of COVID-19 in the region. Our findings reveal insights into the effectiveness of vaccination programs and provide a framework for developing targeted control plans. Through a rigorous examination of model parameters and sensitivity analysis, we identify key factors driving COVID-19 transmission dynamics, emphasizing the significance of vaccination rates and other critical parameters. The validation of our model against real-world data underscores its utility in informing evidence-based decision-making for managing the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh and beyond.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39485754
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312780
pii: PONE-D-24-01170
doi:
Substances chimiques
COVID-19 Vaccines
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0312780Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2024 Kuddus et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.