Attentional Refreshing in Working Memory and Its Interplay with Long-term Memory: A Behavioral and EEG Study.
Journal
Journal of cognitive neuroscience
ISSN: 1530-8898
Titre abrégé: J Cogn Neurosci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8910747
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Nov 2024
01 Nov 2024
Historique:
medline:
1
11
2024
pubmed:
1
11
2024
entrez:
1
11
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Despite the growing interest in the study of attentional refreshing, the functioning of this working memory maintenance mechanism, including its cerebral underpinnings, is still debated. In particular, it remains unclear whether refreshing promotes long-term memory and whether it, in return, depends on long-term memory content to operate. Here, we used direct maintenance instructions and measured brain activity to investigate working memory maintenance with two objectives: (1) test if different behavioral and oscillatory patterns could be observed when participants were instructed to use attentional refreshing versus verbal rehearsal, and (2) observe whether and how refreshing is modulated when maintaining novel (pseudowords) versus familiar (words) memoranda. We conducted an EEG experiment using a modified Brown-Peterson task, in which we manipulated the type of maintenance engaged through explicit instructions (verbal rehearsal vs. refreshing), the type of memoranda (words vs. pseudowords), and the memory load (2 vs. 6). Using scalp EEG, we measured both neural oscillations during working memory maintenance and ERPs during the concurrent parity judgment task. For words, we showed that verbal rehearsal benefited more short-term recall whereas refreshing benefited more delayed recall. In keeping with these behavioral differences between maintenance instructions, frontal-midline theta power increased with memory load only when using verbal rehearsal, whereas occipito-parietal alpha desynchronization was larger with refreshing than verbal rehearsal. When maintaining pseudowords, verbal rehearsal also benefitted short-term recall more than refreshing. However, no long-term memory benefit of refreshing was observed for pseudowords, and oscillatory activity was not different under the two maintenance instructions. Our results provide new evidence supporting the independence between attentional refreshing and verbal rehearsal, and bring new insight into refreshing functioning. We discuss the possible interpretations of these results and the implications for the attentional refreshing literature.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39485914
pii: 125079
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02267
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1-23Subventions
Organisme : LABEX CORTEX
ID : ANR-11-LABX-0042 of Université de Lyon
Organisme : French National Research Agency (Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR])
ID : ANR-11-IDEX-0007
Organisme : ANR
ID : ANR-18-CE28-0012
Organisme : REFLECTOR
Organisme : Institut Universitaire de France
Informations de copyright
© 2024 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.