Department of Pharmacy, University of Pisa Via Bonanno 6 56126 Pisa Italy giulia.bononi@farm.unipi.it valentina.citi@unipi.it alma.martelli@unipi.it giulio.poli@unipi.it tiziano.tuccinardi@unipi.it carlotta.granchi@unipi.it lara.testai@unipi.it vincenzo.calderone@unipi.it filippo.minutolo@unipi.it.
Department of Pharmacy, University of Pisa Via Bonanno 6 56126 Pisa Italy giulia.bononi@farm.unipi.it valentina.citi@unipi.it alma.martelli@unipi.it giulio.poli@unipi.it tiziano.tuccinardi@unipi.it carlotta.granchi@unipi.it lara.testai@unipi.it vincenzo.calderone@unipi.it filippo.minutolo@unipi.it.
Department of Pharmacy, University of Pisa Via Bonanno 6 56126 Pisa Italy giulia.bononi@farm.unipi.it valentina.citi@unipi.it alma.martelli@unipi.it giulio.poli@unipi.it tiziano.tuccinardi@unipi.it carlotta.granchi@unipi.it lara.testai@unipi.it vincenzo.calderone@unipi.it filippo.minutolo@unipi.it.
Center for Instrument Sharing of the University of Pisa (CISUP) Lungarno Pacinotti 43 56126 Pisa Italy.
Department of Pharmacy, University of Pisa Via Bonanno 6 56126 Pisa Italy giulia.bononi@farm.unipi.it valentina.citi@unipi.it alma.martelli@unipi.it giulio.poli@unipi.it tiziano.tuccinardi@unipi.it carlotta.granchi@unipi.it lara.testai@unipi.it vincenzo.calderone@unipi.it filippo.minutolo@unipi.it.
Department of Pharmacy, University of Pisa Via Bonanno 6 56126 Pisa Italy giulia.bononi@farm.unipi.it valentina.citi@unipi.it alma.martelli@unipi.it giulio.poli@unipi.it tiziano.tuccinardi@unipi.it carlotta.granchi@unipi.it lara.testai@unipi.it vincenzo.calderone@unipi.it filippo.minutolo@unipi.it.
Center for Instrument Sharing of the University of Pisa (CISUP) Lungarno Pacinotti 43 56126 Pisa Italy.
Department of Pharmacy, University of Pisa Via Bonanno 6 56126 Pisa Italy giulia.bononi@farm.unipi.it valentina.citi@unipi.it alma.martelli@unipi.it giulio.poli@unipi.it tiziano.tuccinardi@unipi.it carlotta.granchi@unipi.it lara.testai@unipi.it vincenzo.calderone@unipi.it filippo.minutolo@unipi.it.
Center for Instrument Sharing of the University of Pisa (CISUP) Lungarno Pacinotti 43 56126 Pisa Italy.
Department of Pharmacy, University of Pisa Via Bonanno 6 56126 Pisa Italy giulia.bononi@farm.unipi.it valentina.citi@unipi.it alma.martelli@unipi.it giulio.poli@unipi.it tiziano.tuccinardi@unipi.it carlotta.granchi@unipi.it lara.testai@unipi.it vincenzo.calderone@unipi.it filippo.minutolo@unipi.it.
Center for Instrument Sharing of the University of Pisa (CISUP) Lungarno Pacinotti 43 56126 Pisa Italy.
Department of Pharmacy, University of Pisa Via Bonanno 6 56126 Pisa Italy giulia.bononi@farm.unipi.it valentina.citi@unipi.it alma.martelli@unipi.it giulio.poli@unipi.it tiziano.tuccinardi@unipi.it carlotta.granchi@unipi.it lara.testai@unipi.it vincenzo.calderone@unipi.it filippo.minutolo@unipi.it.
Center for Instrument Sharing of the University of Pisa (CISUP) Lungarno Pacinotti 43 56126 Pisa Italy.
Department of Pharmacy, University of Pisa Via Bonanno 6 56126 Pisa Italy giulia.bononi@farm.unipi.it valentina.citi@unipi.it alma.martelli@unipi.it giulio.poli@unipi.it tiziano.tuccinardi@unipi.it carlotta.granchi@unipi.it lara.testai@unipi.it vincenzo.calderone@unipi.it filippo.minutolo@unipi.it.
Center for Instrument Sharing of the University of Pisa (CISUP) Lungarno Pacinotti 43 56126 Pisa Italy.
Department of Animal Sciences, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 761001, Israel.
School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310024, China.
State Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China.
While contrast-enhanced MR imaging is the criterion standard in meningioma diagnosis and treatment response assessment, gallium...
We developed a decision-analytical model based on both recommended guidelines on meningioma management and our institutional experience. Markov models were implemented to estimate quality-adjusted lif...
The cost-effectiveness results demonstrated that...
Gene expression profiling tests can predict the risk of disease recurrence and select patients who are expected to benefit from therapy, while allowing other patients to forgo therapy. For breast canc...
We constructed a Markov decision model to calculate the lifetime costs (in 2020 Euros) and effects (survival and quality-adjusted life-years) of MammaPrint...
Adjuvant endocrine therapy guided by MammaPrint...
Standard MammaPrint...
The traditional cost-effectiveness analysis framework usually takes a healthcare system perspective, where the aim is to maximise population health from a fixed budget allocated to healthcare. Extensi...
This paper aims to develop a comprehensive framework that incorporates into the cost-effectiveness analysis framework some of its most advocated extensions and provides a means of arriving at a unidim...
Building on previous work, I proposed a framework that explicitly incorporates the full extent of the opportunity costs that arise when new dimensions and distributional concerns are included in cost-...
Operationalising the proposed framework requires system-wide representative values and/or robust estimates concerning: (i) selecting dimensions; (ii) measuring opportunity costs associated with each d...
Extending the cost-effectiveness analysis framework entails extending the measurement of the opportunity costs of funding decisions. This implies populating an ambitious puzzle that in some cases pose...
Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is the main way that economic evaluations are carried out in the health care field. However, CEA has limited validity in deciding whether any health care evaluation i...
Cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) has been increasingly used to inform cancer treatment coverage policy making worldwide. The primary objective of this study was to assess the association between indu...
All CEAs in oncology used incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) as health effect identified from the Tufts CEA Registry since 1976 was analyzed. Descriptive analyses were performed to...
A total of 1537 CEAs in oncology published from 1976 to 2021 were included. There were 387 (25.2%) with the industry sponsorship. CEAs sponsored by the industry were more likely to report ICERs below ...
Our study suggests that there has been a significant sponsorship bias in CEAs in oncology. This bias could have a profound implication on drug pricing and coverage policy making....
Several interventions exist for treating myopia progression in children. While these interventions' efficacy has been studied, their cost-effectiveness remains unknown and has not been compared....
To determine cost-effective options for controlling myopia progression in children....
In this cost-effectiveness analysis, a Markov model was designed to compare the cost-effectiveness of interventions for controlling myopia progression over 5 years from a societal perspective in a sim...
The mean costs (in US dollars) per child included the cost of hospital visits, medications, and optical lenses. The outcomes of effectiveness were the annual spherical equivalent refraction (SER) and ...
Outdoor activity, atropine (0.05%), red light therapy, HALs, and orthokeratology were cost-effective. The ICER of atropine, 0.05%, was US $220/SER reduction; red light therapy, US $846/SER reduction; ...
These findings suggest that atropine eye drops, 0.05%, and outdoor activity are cost-effective for controlling myopia progression in children. Though more expensive, red light therapy, HALs, and ortho...
The rising prevalence of myopia is a major global public health concern. Economic evaluation of myopia interventions is critical for maximizing the benefits of treatment and the healthcare system. Thi...
Probability based criteria are proposed for the assessment of cost-effectiveness of a new treatment compared to a standard treatment when there are multiple effectiveness measures. Depending on the pr...
Identification the optimal management intervention of sarcopenia is a concern of health systems. We aimed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of sarcopenia management strategies in Iran....
We constructed a lifetime Markov model based on natural history. The strategies comparedincluded exercise training, nutritional supplements, whole body vibration (WBV), and various exercise interventi...
All seven strategies increased lifetime effectiveness (QALYs). The protein and Vitamin D...
Study results, as the first economic evaluation of sarcopenia management interventions, showed that despite the higher effectiveness of D + P, the D strategy was the most cost-effective. Completing cl...
Typhoid vaccination has been shown to be an effective intervention to prevent enteric fever and is under consideration for inclusion in the national immunization program in Lao PDR....
A cost-utility analysis was performed using an age-structured static decision tree model to estimate the costs and health outcomes of introducing TCV. Vaccination strategies combined with five deliver...
In the model, we estimated 172.2 cases of enteric fever, with 1.3 deaths and a total treatment cost of USD 7,244, based on a birth cohort of 164,662 births without TCV vaccination that was followed ov...
Inclusion of TCV in the national vaccination program in Lao PDR would only be cost-effective if the true typhoid incidence is 25-times higher than our current estimate....
