'Them Two Things are What Collide Together': Understanding the Sexual Identity Experiences of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans People Labelled with Intellectual Disability.
coming out
identity
intellectual disability
interpretative phenomenological analysis
non-heterosexual sexuality
Journal
Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID
ISSN: 1468-3148
Titre abrégé: J Appl Res Intellect Disabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9613616
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Jan 2020
Historique:
accepted:
15
02
2016
pubmed:
20
8
2016
medline:
10
10
2020
entrez:
20
8
2016
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Previous research aiming to understand the lives of lesbian, gay bisexual and trans (LGBT) people labelled with intellectual disabilities is limited. There are few recent studies and available findings are often contradictory and inconsistent. This study aimed to explore how LGBT people labelled with intellectual disabilities experienced their sexual identities. Five LGBT people labelled with intellectual disabilities were interviewed, and data were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis methodology. Four superordinate themes represented the following: common experiences of bullying/abuse, understanding sexualities, other's responses to intellectual disabilities and sexualities, and navigating acceptance. Strategies for coping with abuse maintained participant's engagement in local communities. Sexuality was often problematized by others despite being generally accepted by participants. Coming out was a continual process of decision-making to facilitate safety and acceptance. To feel fully supported, participants desired holistic service provision sensitive to their sexuality and intellectual disability needs. Clinical and research implications are suggested.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Previous research aiming to understand the lives of lesbian, gay bisexual and trans (LGBT) people labelled with intellectual disabilities is limited. There are few recent studies and available findings are often contradictory and inconsistent.
METHOD
METHODS
This study aimed to explore how LGBT people labelled with intellectual disabilities experienced their sexual identities. Five LGBT people labelled with intellectual disabilities were interviewed, and data were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis methodology.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Four superordinate themes represented the following: common experiences of bullying/abuse, understanding sexualities, other's responses to intellectual disabilities and sexualities, and navigating acceptance.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Strategies for coping with abuse maintained participant's engagement in local communities. Sexuality was often problematized by others despite being generally accepted by participants. Coming out was a continual process of decision-making to facilitate safety and acceptance. To feel fully supported, participants desired holistic service provision sensitive to their sexuality and intellectual disability needs. Clinical and research implications are suggested.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3-16Informations de copyright
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Abbott D. & Howarth J. (2005) Secret Loves, Hidden Lives?: Exploring Issues for People with Learning Difficulties who are Gay, Lesbian or Bisexual. The Policy Press, Bristol.
Bartlett A., Smith G. & King M. (2009) The response of mental health professionals to clients seeking help to change or redirect same-sex sexual orientation. BioMed Central Psychiatry 9, 11. Available at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/9/11 (accessed on 23rd June 2014)
Beail N. & Williams K. (2014) Using qualitative methods in research with people who have intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 27, 85-96.
Bennett C. & Coyle A. (2007) A minority within a minority: experiences of gay men with intellectual disabilities. In: Out in Psychology: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Queer Perspectives (eds V. Clarke & E. Peel), pp. 125-145. Wiley, Chichester.
Boyle D. & Harris M. (2009) The Challenge of Co-Production: How Equal Partnerships between Professionals and the Public are Crucial to Improving Public Services. Discussion Paper. London: New Economics Foundation & NESTA. Available at: http://www.nesta.org.uk/publications/challenge-co-production (accessed on 4th May 2014)
Butler J. (1999) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge, New York.
Cass V. C. (1979) Homosexuality identity formation: a theoretical model. Journal of Homosexuality 4, 219-235.
Crenshaw K. (1989) Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 140, 139-167.
Davidson-Paine C. & Corbett J. (1995) A double coming out: gay men with learning disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 23, 147-151.
Davies D. (1996) Pink Therapy: A Guide for Counsellors and Therapists Working with Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Clients. Open University Press, Maidenhead.
Department of Health (2001) A new strategy for learning disability for the 21st century. Available at: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance (accessed on 3rd January 2014). DH_4009153
Department of Health (2009) A new three-year strategy for people with learning disabilities. Available at: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance (accessed on 3rd January 2014) DH_093377.
Department of Health (2010) Making written information easier to understand for people with learning disabilities. Guidance for people who commission or produce easy read information. Revised Edition. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/212121/dh_121927.pdf (accessed on 10th May 2013)
Elderton A. & Jones C. (2011) Finding a safe place to explore sexual identity. The monthly meetings of a group in oxford give its lesbian, gay, transgender and bisexual members a forum in which to be themselves. Anna Elderton and Chris Jones tell the story of Mingle. Learning Disability Practice 14, 14-17.
Elliott R., Fischer C. T. & Rennie D. L. (1999) Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 38, 215-229.
Guasp A. (2012) The school report: the experiences of gay young people in Britain's schools in 2012. http://www.stonewall.org.uk/documents/school_report_2012%282%29.pdf (accessed on 12th June 2014)
Herek G. M., Gillis J. R. & Cogan J. C. (1999) Psychological sequelae of hate-crime victimization among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 67, 945-951.
Horner-Johnson W. & Drum C. E. (2006) Prevalence of maltreatment of people with intellectual disabilities: a review of recently published research. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Review 12, 57-69.
Howarth J., Abbott D. & Gyde K. (2005) Challenging homophobia and heterosexism. Available at: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/norahfry/research/completed-projects/challenging.pdf (accessed on 10th May 2013)
Iacono T. & Johnson H. (2004) Patients with disabilities and complex communication needs: the GP consultation. Australian Family Physician 33, 585-589.
Joint Committee on Human Rights (House of Lords and House of Commons) (2008) A Life like Any Other? Human Rights of Adults with Learning Disabilities. The Stationary Office, London.
Lamb I. (2012) Cognitive assessment. In: Clinical Psychology and People with Intellectual Disabilities, Vol. 97 (eds E. Emerson, C. Hatton, K. Dickson, R. Gone & A. Caine), pp. 63-81. Wiley, Chichester.
Lasser J. & Tharinger D. (2003) Visibility management in school and beyond: a qualitative study of gay, lesbian, bisexual youth. Journal of Adolescence 26, 233-244.
NHS National Research Ethics Service (2011) Information sheets and consent forms. Guidance for researchers and reviewers. Version 3.6.1. Available at: http://www.hra.nhs.uk/documents/2013/09/information-sheet-and-consent-form-guidance.pdf (accessed on 10th May 2013)
Regnard C., Reynolds J., Watson B., Matthews D., Gibson L. & Clarke C. (2007) Understanding distress in people with severe communication difficulties: developing and assessing the Disability Distress Assessment Tool (DisDAT). Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 51, 277-292.
Rushbrooke E., Murray C. & Townsend S. (2014) The experiences of intimate relationships by people with intellectual disabilities: a qualitative study. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 27, 531-541.
Shaw L., Butler C., Langdridge D., Gibson S., Barker M., Lenihan P. & Richards C. (2012) Guidelines and literature review for psychologists working therapeutically with sexual and gender minority clients. Available at: http://www.bps.org.uk/sites/default/files/images/rep_92.pdf (accessed on 17th March 2012)
Smith J. A. (1996) Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: using interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology. Psychology and Health 11, 261-271.
Smith J. A. (2011) Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health Psychology Review 5, 9-27.
Smith J. A. & Osborn M. (2008) Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: Qualitative Psychology a Practical Guide to Research Methods (ed. J. Smith), pp. 53-80. Sage, London.
Smith J., Flowers P. & Larkin M. (2009) Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Sage, London.
Stevenson C. & Cooper N. (1997) Qualitative and quantitative research. Psychologist 10, 159-160.
Stoffelen J., Kok G., Hospers H. & Curfs L. M. G. (2013) Homosexuality among people with a mild intellectual disability: an explorative study on the lived experiences of homosexual people in the Netherlands with a mild intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 57, 257-267.
Thompson D. (1994) Sexual experience and sexual identity for men with learning disabilities who have sex with men. Changes-Sheffield 12, 254-254.
Thompson S. A. (2002) Disabling Sexualities: An Exploratory Multiple Case Study of Self-Identified Gay and Bisexual Men with Developmental Disabilities. (Doctoral dissertation). The University of British Columbia (Canada), Ann Arbor. http://search.proquest.com/docview/305430513?accountid=12117 (accessed on 3rd January 2014)
Warner M. (ed.) (1993) Fear of a Queer Planet: Queer Politics and Social Theory, Vol. 6. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Whitaker S. & Read S. (2006) The prevalence of psychiatric disorders among people with intellectual disabilities: an analysis of the literature. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 19, 330-345.
Withers P. S. (1997) Identity and Sexual Identity in Men with Learning Disabilities. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Wales, Bangor.
Withers P., Ensum I., Howarth D., Krall P., Thomas D., Weekes D. & Hall J. (2001) A psychoeducational group for men with intellectual disabilities who have sex with men. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 14, 327-339.
World Health Organization (1992) ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Description and Diagnostic Guidelines. World Health Organization, Geneva.
Yin R. K. (1989) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 2nd edn. Sage, Beverley Hills.