Successful Hepatoatrial Anastomosis During a Consecutive Liver Retransplant in the Same Patient Shows Good Long-Term Results: Case Report and 2-Year Follow-Up.
Adult
Anastomosis, Surgical
Graft Survival
Heart Atria
/ diagnostic imaging
Hepatectomy
Humans
Liver Transplantation
/ adverse effects
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Pericardial Window Techniques
Postoperative Complications
/ diagnosis
Reoperation
Time Factors
Tissue Adhesions
Treatment Failure
Vena Cava, Inferior
/ diagnostic imaging
Journal
Experimental and clinical transplantation : official journal of the Middle East Society for Organ Transplantation
ISSN: 2146-8427
Titre abrégé: Exp Clin Transplant
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101207333
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2019
04 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
4
5
2017
medline:
14
8
2019
entrez:
4
5
2017
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Liver retransplant is the last and only treatment for patients with irreversible graft failure. It is recognized as a high-risk procedure; thus surgical difficulties are multiplied with every successive liver transplant. Liver retransplant is a demanding technical procedure for the surgeon, with no guarantee of postoperative and long-term survival. Here, we report a 29-year-old male patient who underwent a liver transplant in April 2009 due to primary sclerosing cholangitis with overlapping autoimmune hepatitis. The patient underwent liver retransplant in May 2012 due to graft failure. A second liver retransplant was performed in April 2013 using the classical technique. An inflammatory process involving the inferior vena cava and diaphragm forced the surgeon to open the pericardium from the diaphragm and clamp the cuff of the right atrium to perform a hepatoatrial anastomosis of the inferior vena cava. The next steps were performed as for a typical liver transplant. Postoperative stay was free of complications and was not prolonged. Immunosuppression regimen was kept standard. During our follow-up of more than 32 months, the patient continued to show good results. A consecutive hepatectomy in the same recipient is associated with an increased risk of intraoperative complications. When excessive adhesions limit a safe and functioning cavocaval anastomosis, a hepatectomy with the excision of the intrahepatic inferior vena cava and end-to-end anastomosis through a pericardial window for the extension of the recipient's' vena cava cuff are feasible options. We found that a hepatoatrial anastomosis does not impair good overall outcomes and long-term results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 28467297
doi: 10.6002/ect.2016.0228
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng