Proton Density Fat Suppressed MRI in 3T Increases the Sensitivity of Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Detection in the Cervical Spinal Cord.
Cervical spinal cord
Magnetic resonance
Multiple sclerosis
Journal
Clinical neuroradiology
ISSN: 1869-1447
Titre abrégé: Clin Neuroradiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101526693
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
11
07
2017
accepted:
02
09
2017
pubmed:
28
9
2017
medline:
16
11
2019
entrez:
28
9
2017
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Considering the number of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients referred for clinical spinal cord imaging, the optimization of imaging protocols plays a crucial role. We aimed to evaluate the use of proton density (PD) turbo spin-echo (TSE) with spectral attenuated inversion recovery (SPAIR) fat suppression and compare it with the currently recommended T2-TSE-SPAIR in sagittal plane in cervical spinal cord imaging. In this study 35 MS patients with clinically suspected or known spinal cord lesions were scanned on a 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system. In addition to the routine protocol, PD-TSE-SPAIR sequences were obtained to quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate lesion detectability and image quality compared to T2-TSE-SPAIR sequences. Quantitative analysis was based on measurements of lesion-to-cord contrast ratio (LCCR), lesion contrast-to-noise ratio (LCNR) and lesion dimensions and the qualitative analysis on ranking with a predetermined score scale. The presence of lesions in these sequences was verified in axial T2 multi-echo gradient echo images. In quantitative analysis, the lesions on PD-TSE-SPAIR had statistically significantly higher contrast (p < 0.05), according to the statistical test of LCCR, LCNR calculated contrast and measured lesion dimensions. Qualitative analyses were congruent with quantitative results; the median rank of PD-TSE-SPAIR was significantly higher than T2-TSE-SPAIR (p < 0.05). Of the 34 detected lesions 9 (26%) were not visualized in T2-TSE-SPAIR sequence. Considering its superiority in contrast ratios and lesion dimensions when compared to T2-TSE-SPAIR in both qualitative and quantitative analyses, we therefore recommend PD-TSE-SPAIR as a pivotal sequence to evaluate demyelinating spinal cord lesions at 3T.
Identifiants
pubmed: 28951942
doi: 10.1007/s00062-017-0626-4
pii: 10.1007/s00062-017-0626-4
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
45-50Références
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999 Oct;20(9):1710-6
pubmed: 10543646
N Engl J Med. 2000 Sep 28;343(13):938-52
pubmed: 11006371
Neuroradiology. 2000 Sep;42(9):669-75
pubmed: 11071441
Brain. 2001 Jan;124(Pt 1):154-66
pubmed: 11133795
Ann Neurol. 2001 Jul;50(1):121-7
pubmed: 11456302
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Mar;188(3):697-702
pubmed: 17312056
Lancet Neurol. 2007 Aug;6(8):677-86
pubmed: 17616439
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Dec;80(3):780-5
pubmed: 21041051
Clin Neuroradiol. 2012 Mar;22(1):93-9
pubmed: 22193978
Clin Neuroradiol. 2015 Oct;25 Suppl 2:157-65
pubmed: 26198879
Eur J Neurol. 2015 Oct;22 Suppl 2:3-13
pubmed: 26374508
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 Jan;37(1):180-4
pubmed: 26427838
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 Mar;37(3):394-401
pubmed: 26564433
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2016 Oct;16(10):90
pubmed: 27549391
Magn Reson Imaging. 1993;11(3):341-55
pubmed: 8505868
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Mar;166(3):523-6
pubmed: 8623620
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996 Sep;17(8):1555-65
pubmed: 8883656