Comparing the effectiveness of general dietary advice versus a very low energy diet in an obese outpatient population in Australia.
Body composition
Diet
Obesity
Very low energy diet
Journal
Eating and weight disorders : EWD
ISSN: 1590-1262
Titre abrégé: Eat Weight Disord
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9707113
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
27
04
2017
accepted:
13
09
2017
pubmed:
13
10
2017
medline:
11
1
2020
entrez:
13
10
2017
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Obesity is a major public health burden. Outpatient clinics are an essential resource for individuals with obesity to access advice for weight loss management. The aim of this study was to compare anthropometric and weight loss outcomes between participants receiving general dietary (GD) advice, and those on a very low energy diet (VLED) under non-trial conditions. Data from 276 adults with obesity attending a multidisciplinary weight management clinic were analysed. Changes in anthropometry, body composition, and blood pressure (BP) over 12 months were analysed using linear mixed-effects models. Males on the GD demonstrated statistically greater reductions in body weight (BW), BMI, percent fat mass (FM), systolic BP, waist and hip circumference (p < 0.01). Changes in males on a VLED did not reach significance. Females showed statistically significant reductions in BW, BMI, waist and hip circumference regardless of dietary intervention (p < 0.01); those on the GD significantly reduced percent FM (p < 0.001). Females on a VLED had statistically greater reductions in BW, BMI and systolic BP compared to those on the GD. No effect of exercise physiologist was observed in this study. Participants prescribed a GD attended for significantly longer than those on a VLED (p < 0.05), irrespective of gender. At 12 months, 14.3 and 4.5% of males and females on a VLED were still attending, compared to 10.6 and 4.5% on the GD. In this retrospective study, females in both dietary intervention groups achieved significant changes across multiple measures. Only men receiving GD advice demonstrated significant changes. Level II-2.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29022288
doi: 10.1007/s40519-017-0443-4
pii: 10.1007/s40519-017-0443-4
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
739-747Références
J Intern Med. 2003 Sep;254(3):272-9
pubmed: 12930237
JAMA. 2004 Oct 13;292(14):1724-37
pubmed: 15479938
Obes Res. 2005 Feb;13(2):372-9
pubmed: 15800296
Ann Pharmacother. 2005 Dec;39(12):2015-20
pubmed: 16288070
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2006;15 Suppl:49-54
pubmed: 16928661
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Apr;22(4):504-9
pubmed: 17376041
J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 Oct;107(10):1755-67
pubmed: 17904936
Eur J Intern Med. 2008 May;19(3):173-80
pubmed: 18395160
Nutr J. 2008 Sep 09;7:26
pubmed: 18778488
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Mar;24(3):399-407
pubmed: 19067776
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2009 Feb;22(1):72-6
pubmed: 19192029
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jan 25;170(2):146-54
pubmed: 20101009
Clin Nutr. 2011 Oct;30(5):610-5
pubmed: 21555168
Int J Obes (Lond). 2012 Apr;36(4):614-24
pubmed: 21673653
Public Health Nutr. 2012 Jan;15(1):28-38
pubmed: 21806868
N Engl J Med. 2011 Nov 24;365(21):1969-79
pubmed: 22082239
Ann Behav Med. 2012 Aug;44(1):119-28
pubmed: 22552838
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Jan;112(1):75-80
pubmed: 22717178
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2014 Feb;27(1):22-9
pubmed: 23531190
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Feb;22(2):325-31
pubmed: 23963786
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Nutrition. 2014 Jan;30(1):49-54
pubmed: 24290598
Obes Res Clin Pract. 2008 Sep;2(3):I-II
pubmed: 24351771
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 20;14:78
pubmed: 24552252
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2015 Dec;28(6):593-603
pubmed: 25231461
Med J Aust. 2014 Nov 3;201(9):502-3
pubmed: 25358562
N Engl J Med. 1981 Apr 16;304(16):930-3
pubmed: 7010165