Children's exposure to food advertising: the impact of statutory restrictions.


Journal

Health promotion international
ISSN: 1460-2245
Titre abrégé: Health Promot Int
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9008939

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Apr 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 2 11 2017
medline: 17 7 2019
entrez: 2 11 2017
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Evidence demonstrating links between exposure to unhealthy food marketing, poor eating behaviours and paediatric obesity has led to calls for regulatory change in many countries, including the UK. However no official monitoring system exists to inform international debate on food advertising policy. This study systematically explores food advertising on UK television in 2010 (post-regulation) and compare this to 2008 (mid-regulation) to assess if food adverts improved in nutritional quality after implementation of regulations. Television was recorded between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. for one weekday and one weekend day during 6 months of 2010 across 13 commercial television channels popular with children. These data were directly compared with previously published data for 2008. Food and beverages were the third most frequently advertised product type (11.9% of all ads), a decrease of 0.9% from 2008 (12.8%). Non-core food commercials decreased (down 2.2-53.8%) and core food advertising increased (up 0.5-18.6%). Fast food items were the third most frequently advertised food product (15.4%, up 3.5% from 2008). During peak children's viewing times, 17.0% of all commercials were for food, an increase of 4.7% from non-peak children's viewing times and fewer core (-0.9%) and more non-core (+0.5%) foods were advertised at these times. Despite statutory regulation, frequency and balance of food commercials (core, non-core and miscellaneous) remained relatively static over the 2 years. Children are still exposed to high amounts of unhealthy food advertising on television. Continued monitoring of television food advertising remains crucial and policymakers should examine the comparative efficacy of other restrictions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 29092014
pii: 4582284
doi: 10.1093/heapro/dax044
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

227-235

Informations de copyright

© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Rosa Whalen (R)

Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Joanne Harrold (J)

Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Simon Child (S)

Cambridge Assessment, 1 Hills Road, Cambridge, UK.

Jason Halford (J)

Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Emma Boyland (E)

Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH