Genomic Profile of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Upper Tract from Ureteroscopic Biopsy: Feasibility and Validation Using Matched Radical Nephroureterectomy Specimens.
Biomarkers
Genomics
Prediction
Transitional cell carcinoma
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Journal
European urology focus
ISSN: 2405-4569
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Focus
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101665661
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2019
05 2019
Historique:
received:
14
12
2017
accepted:
04
01
2018
pubmed:
6
2
2018
medline:
10
10
2020
entrez:
4
2
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract (UTUC) presents specific challenges regarding accurate staging and tumor sampling. We aimed to assess the feasibility of applying next-generation sequencing to biopsy specimens and gauged the concordance of their genetic profiles with matched radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) specimens. Of the 39 biopsy specimens collected, 36 (92%) had adequate material for sequencing using a hybridization-based exon capture assay (MSK-IMPACT). The most frequently altered genes across the patient cohort were consistent with the urothelial carcinoma-associated alterations identified in a cohort of 130 RNU specimens previously sequenced at our center, including mutations in the TERT promoter (64%), hotspot activating mutations in FGFR3 (64%), and frequent mutations in chromatin remodeling genes. For 12 patients, a matching tumor sample from a subsequent RNU was sequenced. We found a high level of concordance between matched biopsy and RNU specimens, up to 92% for the likely pathogenic alterations. PATIENT SUMMARY: We evaluated the feasibility of genomic characterization of tumor tissue collected at the time of ureteroscopic biopsy and found high concordance with subsequent radical nephroureterectomy specimens. Molecular characterization of urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract biopsies could guide treatment decision-making and identify high-risk patients who could benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy and low-risk patients who could benefit from conservative or organ-sparing strategies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29396293
pii: S2405-4569(18)30006-3
doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.01.005
pmc: PMC7583604
mid: NIHMS1626765
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
365-368Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P50 CA221745
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Références
Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):529-41
pubmed: 24680361
BJU Int. 2013 Aug;112(4):453-61
pubmed: 23464979
Eur Urol. 2017 Oct;72(4):641-649
pubmed: 28601352
J Urol. 2016 Jun;195(6):1684-1689
pubmed: 26778714
Eur Urol. 2015 Dec;68(6):970-7
pubmed: 26278805
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Dec;40(12):1629-34
pubmed: 25108813
J Urol. 2013 Apr;189(4):1214-21
pubmed: 23023150
J Mol Diagn. 2015 May;17(3):251-64
pubmed: 25801821
Eur Urol. 2015 Dec;68(6):959-67
pubmed: 26238431
Nat Genet. 2016 Dec;48(12):1490-1499
pubmed: 27749842