Role of Routine Dilatations after Anorectal Reconstruction-Comparison of Two Tertiary Centers.
Anorectal Malformations
/ surgery
Dilatation
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Infant
Intestinal Obstruction
/ epidemiology
Male
Postoperative Care
/ methods
Postoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Rectal Diseases
/ epidemiology
Retrospective Studies
Tertiary Care Centers
Treatment Outcome
United Kingdom
Journal
European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie
ISSN: 1439-359X
Titre abrégé: Eur J Pediatr Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9105263
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
1
3
2018
medline:
4
12
2019
entrez:
1
3
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Regular anal dilatations are commonly recommended in the postoperative management following posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) in anorectal malformations (ARM). We hypothesized that routine postoperative dilatations may not affect surgical outcomes following PSARP. We compare surgical outcomes of routine postoperative dilatations versus no routine postoperative dilatations from two United Kingdom tertiary pediatric surgical centers. This is retrospective records review of patients undergoing definitive surgery for ARM in two tertiary surgical centers in the UK over 5 years. Center A used a protocol of routine postoperative dilatations, and center B used a protocol, which used dilatations only for clinical indications of stricture. Data collected included ARM type, operative procedures, and postoperative interventions. All post-operative interventions under general anesthesia (GA) were compared between groups. From 2011 to 2015, 49 procedures (46 PSARPs) were performed in center A and 54 (52 PSARPs) in center B. Median follow up period was 31 months (interquartile range [IQR] 18-48). The first postoperative anal calibration under GA was documented for 43 (86%) patients in center A and for 42 (78%) patients in center B. Following this, center A followed routine postoperative dilatation (RPD) at home, and center B reserved further dilatations for specific indications. RPD was performed for 100% of patients in center A versus 8% in center B. Further anal dilatations under GA were performed in 19 (38%) children in center A and in 17 (34%) children in center B ( The use of routine postoperative dilatations does not significantly improve surgical outcomes following PSARP in ARM.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29490378
doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1632392
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
243-246Informations de copyright
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None.